Cargando…

Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation

OBJECTIVES: Bone material properties are a major determinant of bone health in older age, both in terms of fracture risk and implant fixation, in orthopaedics and dentistry. Bone is an anisotropic and hierarchical material so its measured material properties depend upon the scale of metric used. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boughton, Oliver R., Ma, Shaocheng, Zhao, Sarah, Arnold, Matthew, Lewis, Angus, Hansen, Ulrich, Cobb, Justin P., Giuliani, Finn, Abel, Richard L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30001364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200475
_version_ 1783339209006776320
author Boughton, Oliver R.
Ma, Shaocheng
Zhao, Sarah
Arnold, Matthew
Lewis, Angus
Hansen, Ulrich
Cobb, Justin P.
Giuliani, Finn
Abel, Richard L.
author_facet Boughton, Oliver R.
Ma, Shaocheng
Zhao, Sarah
Arnold, Matthew
Lewis, Angus
Hansen, Ulrich
Cobb, Justin P.
Giuliani, Finn
Abel, Richard L.
author_sort Boughton, Oliver R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Bone material properties are a major determinant of bone health in older age, both in terms of fracture risk and implant fixation, in orthopaedics and dentistry. Bone is an anisotropic and hierarchical material so its measured material properties depend upon the scale of metric used. The scale used should reflect the clinical problem, whether it is fracture risk, a whole bone problem, or implant stability, at the millimetre-scale. Indentation, an engineering technique involving pressing a hard-tipped material into another material with a known force, may be able to assess bone stiffness at the millimetre-scale (the apparent elastic modulus). We aimed to investigate whether spherical-tip indentation could reliably measure the apparent elastic modulus of human cortical bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cortical bone samples were retrieved from the femoral necks of nineteen patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery (10 females, 9 males, mean age: 69 years). The samples underwent indentation using a 1.5 mm diameter, ruby, spherical indenter tip, with sixty indentations per patient sample, across six locations on the bone surfaces, with ten repeated indentations at each of the six locations. The samples then underwent mechanical compression testing. The repeatability of indentation measurements of elastic modulus was assessed using the co-efficient of repeatability and the correlation between the bone elastic modulus measured by indentation and compression testing was analysed by least-squares regression. RESULTS: In total, 1140 indentations in total were performed. Indentation was found to be repeatable for indentations performed at the same locations on the bone samples with a mean co-efficient of repeatability of 0.4 GigaPascals (GPa), confidence interval (C.I): 0.33–0.42 GPa. There was variation in the indentation modulus results between different locations on the bone samples (mean co-efficient of repeatability: 3.1 GPa, C.I: 2.2–3.90 GPa). No clear correlation was observed between indentation and compression values of bone elastic modulus (r = 0.33, p = 0.17). The mean apparent elastic modulus obtained by spherical indentation was 9.9 GPa, the standard deviation for each indent cycle was 0.11 GPa, and the standard deviation between locations on the same sample was 1.01 GPa. The mean compression apparent elastic modulus was 4.42 GPa, standard deviation 1.02 GPa. DISCUSSION: Spherical-tip indentation was found to be a repeatable test for measuring the elastic modulus of human cortical bone, demonstrated by a low co-efficient of repeatability in this study. It could not, however, reliably predict cortical bone elastic modulus determined by platens compression testing in this study. This may be due to indentation only probing mechanical properties at the micro-scale while platens compression testing assesses millimetre length-scale properties. Improvements to the testing technique, including the use of a larger diameter spherical indenter tip, may improve the measurement of bone stiffness at the millimetre scale and should be investigated further.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6042739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60427392018-07-19 Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation Boughton, Oliver R. Ma, Shaocheng Zhao, Sarah Arnold, Matthew Lewis, Angus Hansen, Ulrich Cobb, Justin P. Giuliani, Finn Abel, Richard L. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Bone material properties are a major determinant of bone health in older age, both in terms of fracture risk and implant fixation, in orthopaedics and dentistry. Bone is an anisotropic and hierarchical material so its measured material properties depend upon the scale of metric used. The scale used should reflect the clinical problem, whether it is fracture risk, a whole bone problem, or implant stability, at the millimetre-scale. Indentation, an engineering technique involving pressing a hard-tipped material into another material with a known force, may be able to assess bone stiffness at the millimetre-scale (the apparent elastic modulus). We aimed to investigate whether spherical-tip indentation could reliably measure the apparent elastic modulus of human cortical bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cortical bone samples were retrieved from the femoral necks of nineteen patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery (10 females, 9 males, mean age: 69 years). The samples underwent indentation using a 1.5 mm diameter, ruby, spherical indenter tip, with sixty indentations per patient sample, across six locations on the bone surfaces, with ten repeated indentations at each of the six locations. The samples then underwent mechanical compression testing. The repeatability of indentation measurements of elastic modulus was assessed using the co-efficient of repeatability and the correlation between the bone elastic modulus measured by indentation and compression testing was analysed by least-squares regression. RESULTS: In total, 1140 indentations in total were performed. Indentation was found to be repeatable for indentations performed at the same locations on the bone samples with a mean co-efficient of repeatability of 0.4 GigaPascals (GPa), confidence interval (C.I): 0.33–0.42 GPa. There was variation in the indentation modulus results between different locations on the bone samples (mean co-efficient of repeatability: 3.1 GPa, C.I: 2.2–3.90 GPa). No clear correlation was observed between indentation and compression values of bone elastic modulus (r = 0.33, p = 0.17). The mean apparent elastic modulus obtained by spherical indentation was 9.9 GPa, the standard deviation for each indent cycle was 0.11 GPa, and the standard deviation between locations on the same sample was 1.01 GPa. The mean compression apparent elastic modulus was 4.42 GPa, standard deviation 1.02 GPa. DISCUSSION: Spherical-tip indentation was found to be a repeatable test for measuring the elastic modulus of human cortical bone, demonstrated by a low co-efficient of repeatability in this study. It could not, however, reliably predict cortical bone elastic modulus determined by platens compression testing in this study. This may be due to indentation only probing mechanical properties at the micro-scale while platens compression testing assesses millimetre length-scale properties. Improvements to the testing technique, including the use of a larger diameter spherical indenter tip, may improve the measurement of bone stiffness at the millimetre scale and should be investigated further. Public Library of Science 2018-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6042739/ /pubmed/30001364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200475 Text en © 2018 Boughton et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Boughton, Oliver R.
Ma, Shaocheng
Zhao, Sarah
Arnold, Matthew
Lewis, Angus
Hansen, Ulrich
Cobb, Justin P.
Giuliani, Finn
Abel, Richard L.
Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation
title Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation
title_full Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation
title_fullStr Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation
title_full_unstemmed Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation
title_short Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation
title_sort measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30001364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200475
work_keys_str_mv AT boughtonoliverr measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation
AT mashaocheng measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation
AT zhaosarah measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation
AT arnoldmatthew measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation
AT lewisangus measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation
AT hansenulrich measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation
AT cobbjustinp measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation
AT giulianifinn measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation
AT abelrichardl measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation