Cargando…

Alpha Oscillations during Incidental Encoding Predict Subsequent Memory for New “Foil” Information

People can employ adaptive strategies to increase the likelihood that previously encoded information will be successfully retrieved. One such strategy is to constrain retrieval toward relevant information by reimplementing the neurocognitive processes that were engaged during encoding. Using EEG, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vogelsang, David A., Gruber, Matthias, Bergström, Zara M., Ranganath, Charan, Simons, Jon S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MIT Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29324072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01234
_version_ 1783339230851760128
author Vogelsang, David A.
Gruber, Matthias
Bergström, Zara M.
Ranganath, Charan
Simons, Jon S.
author_facet Vogelsang, David A.
Gruber, Matthias
Bergström, Zara M.
Ranganath, Charan
Simons, Jon S.
author_sort Vogelsang, David A.
collection PubMed
description People can employ adaptive strategies to increase the likelihood that previously encoded information will be successfully retrieved. One such strategy is to constrain retrieval toward relevant information by reimplementing the neurocognitive processes that were engaged during encoding. Using EEG, we examined the temporal dynamics with which constraining retrieval toward semantic versus nonsemantic information affects the processing of new “foil” information encountered during a memory test. Time–frequency analysis of EEG data acquired during an initial study phase revealed that semantic compared with nonsemantic processing was associated with alpha decreases in a left frontal electrode cluster from around 600 msec after stimulus onset. Successful encoding of semantic versus nonsemantic foils during a subsequent memory test was related to decreases in alpha oscillatory activity in the same left frontal electrode cluster, which emerged relatively late in the trial at around 1000–1600 msec after stimulus onset. Across participants, left frontal alpha power elicited by semantic processing during the study phase correlated significantly with left frontal alpha power associated with semantic foil encoding during the memory test. Furthermore, larger left frontal alpha power decreases elicited by semantic foil encoding during the memory test predicted better subsequent semantic foil recognition in an additional surprise foil memory test, although this effect did not reach significance. These findings indicate that constraining retrieval toward semantic information involves reimplementing semantic encoding operations that are mediated by alpha oscillations and that such reimplementation occurs at a late stage of memory retrieval, perhaps reflecting additional monitoring processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6042834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MIT Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60428342018-07-25 Alpha Oscillations during Incidental Encoding Predict Subsequent Memory for New “Foil” Information Vogelsang, David A. Gruber, Matthias Bergström, Zara M. Ranganath, Charan Simons, Jon S. J Cogn Neurosci Articles People can employ adaptive strategies to increase the likelihood that previously encoded information will be successfully retrieved. One such strategy is to constrain retrieval toward relevant information by reimplementing the neurocognitive processes that were engaged during encoding. Using EEG, we examined the temporal dynamics with which constraining retrieval toward semantic versus nonsemantic information affects the processing of new “foil” information encountered during a memory test. Time–frequency analysis of EEG data acquired during an initial study phase revealed that semantic compared with nonsemantic processing was associated with alpha decreases in a left frontal electrode cluster from around 600 msec after stimulus onset. Successful encoding of semantic versus nonsemantic foils during a subsequent memory test was related to decreases in alpha oscillatory activity in the same left frontal electrode cluster, which emerged relatively late in the trial at around 1000–1600 msec after stimulus onset. Across participants, left frontal alpha power elicited by semantic processing during the study phase correlated significantly with left frontal alpha power associated with semantic foil encoding during the memory test. Furthermore, larger left frontal alpha power decreases elicited by semantic foil encoding during the memory test predicted better subsequent semantic foil recognition in an additional surprise foil memory test, although this effect did not reach significance. These findings indicate that constraining retrieval toward semantic information involves reimplementing semantic encoding operations that are mediated by alpha oscillations and that such reimplementation occurs at a late stage of memory retrieval, perhaps reflecting additional monitoring processes. MIT Press 2018-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6042834/ /pubmed/29324072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01234 Text en © 2018 Massachusetts Institute of Technology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Vogelsang, David A.
Gruber, Matthias
Bergström, Zara M.
Ranganath, Charan
Simons, Jon S.
Alpha Oscillations during Incidental Encoding Predict Subsequent Memory for New “Foil” Information
title Alpha Oscillations during Incidental Encoding Predict Subsequent Memory for New “Foil” Information
title_full Alpha Oscillations during Incidental Encoding Predict Subsequent Memory for New “Foil” Information
title_fullStr Alpha Oscillations during Incidental Encoding Predict Subsequent Memory for New “Foil” Information
title_full_unstemmed Alpha Oscillations during Incidental Encoding Predict Subsequent Memory for New “Foil” Information
title_short Alpha Oscillations during Incidental Encoding Predict Subsequent Memory for New “Foil” Information
title_sort alpha oscillations during incidental encoding predict subsequent memory for new “foil” information
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6042834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29324072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01234
work_keys_str_mv AT vogelsangdavida alphaoscillationsduringincidentalencodingpredictsubsequentmemoryfornewfoilinformation
AT grubermatthias alphaoscillationsduringincidentalencodingpredictsubsequentmemoryfornewfoilinformation
AT bergstromzaram alphaoscillationsduringincidentalencodingpredictsubsequentmemoryfornewfoilinformation
AT ranganathcharan alphaoscillationsduringincidentalencodingpredictsubsequentmemoryfornewfoilinformation
AT simonsjons alphaoscillationsduringincidentalencodingpredictsubsequentmemoryfornewfoilinformation