Cargando…
Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies
BACKGROUND: Combining genomic data sets from multiple studies is advantageous to increase statistical power in studies where logistical considerations restrict sample size or require the sequential generation of data. However, significant technical heterogeneity is commonly observed across multiple...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30001694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2263-6 |
_version_ | 1783339397669715968 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yuqing Jenkins, David F. Manimaran, Solaiappan Johnson, W. Evan |
author_facet | Zhang, Yuqing Jenkins, David F. Manimaran, Solaiappan Johnson, W. Evan |
author_sort | Zhang, Yuqing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Combining genomic data sets from multiple studies is advantageous to increase statistical power in studies where logistical considerations restrict sample size or require the sequential generation of data. However, significant technical heterogeneity is commonly observed across multiple batches of data that are generated from different processing or reagent batches, experimenters, protocols, or profiling platforms. These so-called batch effects often confound true biological relationships in the data, reducing the power benefits of combining multiple batches, and may even lead to spurious results in some combined studies. Therefore there is significant need for effective methods and software tools that account for batch effects in high-throughput genomic studies. RESULTS: Here we contribute multiple methods and software tools for improved combination and analysis of data from multiple batches. In particular, we provide batch effect solutions for cases where the severity of the batch effects is not extreme, and for cases where one high-quality batch can serve as a reference, such as the training set in a biomarker study. We illustrate our approaches and software in both simulated and real data scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the value of these new contributions compared to currently established approaches in the specified batch correction situations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2263-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6044013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60440132018-07-13 Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies Zhang, Yuqing Jenkins, David F. Manimaran, Solaiappan Johnson, W. Evan BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Combining genomic data sets from multiple studies is advantageous to increase statistical power in studies where logistical considerations restrict sample size or require the sequential generation of data. However, significant technical heterogeneity is commonly observed across multiple batches of data that are generated from different processing or reagent batches, experimenters, protocols, or profiling platforms. These so-called batch effects often confound true biological relationships in the data, reducing the power benefits of combining multiple batches, and may even lead to spurious results in some combined studies. Therefore there is significant need for effective methods and software tools that account for batch effects in high-throughput genomic studies. RESULTS: Here we contribute multiple methods and software tools for improved combination and analysis of data from multiple batches. In particular, we provide batch effect solutions for cases where the severity of the batch effects is not extreme, and for cases where one high-quality batch can serve as a reference, such as the training set in a biomarker study. We illustrate our approaches and software in both simulated and real data scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the value of these new contributions compared to currently established approaches in the specified batch correction situations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12859-018-2263-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6044013/ /pubmed/30001694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2263-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Zhang, Yuqing Jenkins, David F. Manimaran, Solaiappan Johnson, W. Evan Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies |
title | Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies |
title_full | Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies |
title_fullStr | Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies |
title_short | Alternative empirical Bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies |
title_sort | alternative empirical bayes models for adjusting for batch effects in genomic studies |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30001694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2263-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyuqing alternativeempiricalbayesmodelsforadjustingforbatcheffectsingenomicstudies AT jenkinsdavidf alternativeempiricalbayesmodelsforadjustingforbatcheffectsingenomicstudies AT manimaransolaiappan alternativeempiricalbayesmodelsforadjustingforbatcheffectsingenomicstudies AT johnsonwevan alternativeempiricalbayesmodelsforadjustingforbatcheffectsingenomicstudies |