Cargando…

Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Child Health research is reported to be at worryingly low level by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Recent survey showed that 54.5% of paediatric consultants in the United Kingdom do not do any research at all. We conducted a mixed methods study to understand barriers a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mustafa, Khurram, Murray, Carolyn Czoski, Nicklin, Emma, Glaser, Adam, Andrews, Jacqueline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30005649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1263-6
_version_ 1783339399333806080
author Mustafa, Khurram
Murray, Carolyn Czoski
Nicklin, Emma
Glaser, Adam
Andrews, Jacqueline
author_facet Mustafa, Khurram
Murray, Carolyn Czoski
Nicklin, Emma
Glaser, Adam
Andrews, Jacqueline
author_sort Mustafa, Khurram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Child Health research is reported to be at worryingly low level by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Recent survey showed that 54.5% of paediatric consultants in the United Kingdom do not do any research at all. We conducted a mixed methods study to understand barriers and facilitators for research involvement among paediatric trainees who are going to fill these consultant posts in the future. METHODS: A questionnaire based on a validated index for research and development was completed by 136 paediatric trainees within a region in the North of England (Yorkshire and Humber). Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with stratified purposive sampling. Descriptive statistics and Chi-Square test for independence were used for quantitative analysis. Thematic content analysis was done for interviews based on analysis method framework. RESULTS: 136 out of 396 trainees responded to the survey. There was a significant relationship between confidence in using research in practice and ability to understand research terminology. This was not related to research experience or training. Males were significantly more likely to have presented a research paper, know how research influences practice and have more confidence in using research in practice than females. There was no significant relationship between gender and research training or highest qualification. Time constraints and lack of academic culture were the most frequently mentioned barriers in the survey. Over-arching themes identified from the interviews were related to lack of academic culture, opportunities provided in current training scheme and constraints related to time availability along with workforce management. CONCLUSION: Paediatric research requires a supportive academic culture with more flexibility in training scheme and immediate attention to a pressing staffing crisis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1263-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6044020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60440202018-07-13 Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study Mustafa, Khurram Murray, Carolyn Czoski Nicklin, Emma Glaser, Adam Andrews, Jacqueline BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Child Health research is reported to be at worryingly low level by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Recent survey showed that 54.5% of paediatric consultants in the United Kingdom do not do any research at all. We conducted a mixed methods study to understand barriers and facilitators for research involvement among paediatric trainees who are going to fill these consultant posts in the future. METHODS: A questionnaire based on a validated index for research and development was completed by 136 paediatric trainees within a region in the North of England (Yorkshire and Humber). Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with stratified purposive sampling. Descriptive statistics and Chi-Square test for independence were used for quantitative analysis. Thematic content analysis was done for interviews based on analysis method framework. RESULTS: 136 out of 396 trainees responded to the survey. There was a significant relationship between confidence in using research in practice and ability to understand research terminology. This was not related to research experience or training. Males were significantly more likely to have presented a research paper, know how research influences practice and have more confidence in using research in practice than females. There was no significant relationship between gender and research training or highest qualification. Time constraints and lack of academic culture were the most frequently mentioned barriers in the survey. Over-arching themes identified from the interviews were related to lack of academic culture, opportunities provided in current training scheme and constraints related to time availability along with workforce management. CONCLUSION: Paediatric research requires a supportive academic culture with more flexibility in training scheme and immediate attention to a pressing staffing crisis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1263-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6044020/ /pubmed/30005649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1263-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mustafa, Khurram
Murray, Carolyn Czoski
Nicklin, Emma
Glaser, Adam
Andrews, Jacqueline
Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study
title Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study
title_full Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study
title_short Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study
title_sort understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30005649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1263-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mustafakhurram understandingbarriersforresearchinvolvementamongpaediatrictraineesamixedmethodsstudy
AT murraycarolynczoski understandingbarriersforresearchinvolvementamongpaediatrictraineesamixedmethodsstudy
AT nicklinemma understandingbarriersforresearchinvolvementamongpaediatrictraineesamixedmethodsstudy
AT glaseradam understandingbarriersforresearchinvolvementamongpaediatrictraineesamixedmethodsstudy
AT andrewsjacqueline understandingbarriersforresearchinvolvementamongpaediatrictraineesamixedmethodsstudy