Cargando…
Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study
BACKGROUND: Child Health research is reported to be at worryingly low level by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Recent survey showed that 54.5% of paediatric consultants in the United Kingdom do not do any research at all. We conducted a mixed methods study to understand barriers a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30005649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1263-6 |
_version_ | 1783339399333806080 |
---|---|
author | Mustafa, Khurram Murray, Carolyn Czoski Nicklin, Emma Glaser, Adam Andrews, Jacqueline |
author_facet | Mustafa, Khurram Murray, Carolyn Czoski Nicklin, Emma Glaser, Adam Andrews, Jacqueline |
author_sort | Mustafa, Khurram |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Child Health research is reported to be at worryingly low level by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Recent survey showed that 54.5% of paediatric consultants in the United Kingdom do not do any research at all. We conducted a mixed methods study to understand barriers and facilitators for research involvement among paediatric trainees who are going to fill these consultant posts in the future. METHODS: A questionnaire based on a validated index for research and development was completed by 136 paediatric trainees within a region in the North of England (Yorkshire and Humber). Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with stratified purposive sampling. Descriptive statistics and Chi-Square test for independence were used for quantitative analysis. Thematic content analysis was done for interviews based on analysis method framework. RESULTS: 136 out of 396 trainees responded to the survey. There was a significant relationship between confidence in using research in practice and ability to understand research terminology. This was not related to research experience or training. Males were significantly more likely to have presented a research paper, know how research influences practice and have more confidence in using research in practice than females. There was no significant relationship between gender and research training or highest qualification. Time constraints and lack of academic culture were the most frequently mentioned barriers in the survey. Over-arching themes identified from the interviews were related to lack of academic culture, opportunities provided in current training scheme and constraints related to time availability along with workforce management. CONCLUSION: Paediatric research requires a supportive academic culture with more flexibility in training scheme and immediate attention to a pressing staffing crisis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1263-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6044020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60440202018-07-13 Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study Mustafa, Khurram Murray, Carolyn Czoski Nicklin, Emma Glaser, Adam Andrews, Jacqueline BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Child Health research is reported to be at worryingly low level by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Recent survey showed that 54.5% of paediatric consultants in the United Kingdom do not do any research at all. We conducted a mixed methods study to understand barriers and facilitators for research involvement among paediatric trainees who are going to fill these consultant posts in the future. METHODS: A questionnaire based on a validated index for research and development was completed by 136 paediatric trainees within a region in the North of England (Yorkshire and Humber). Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with stratified purposive sampling. Descriptive statistics and Chi-Square test for independence were used for quantitative analysis. Thematic content analysis was done for interviews based on analysis method framework. RESULTS: 136 out of 396 trainees responded to the survey. There was a significant relationship between confidence in using research in practice and ability to understand research terminology. This was not related to research experience or training. Males were significantly more likely to have presented a research paper, know how research influences practice and have more confidence in using research in practice than females. There was no significant relationship between gender and research training or highest qualification. Time constraints and lack of academic culture were the most frequently mentioned barriers in the survey. Over-arching themes identified from the interviews were related to lack of academic culture, opportunities provided in current training scheme and constraints related to time availability along with workforce management. CONCLUSION: Paediatric research requires a supportive academic culture with more flexibility in training scheme and immediate attention to a pressing staffing crisis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1263-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6044020/ /pubmed/30005649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1263-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mustafa, Khurram Murray, Carolyn Czoski Nicklin, Emma Glaser, Adam Andrews, Jacqueline Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study |
title | Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study |
title_full | Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study |
title_fullStr | Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study |
title_short | Understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study |
title_sort | understanding barriers for research involvement among paediatric trainees: a mixed methods study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30005649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1263-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mustafakhurram understandingbarriersforresearchinvolvementamongpaediatrictraineesamixedmethodsstudy AT murraycarolynczoski understandingbarriersforresearchinvolvementamongpaediatrictraineesamixedmethodsstudy AT nicklinemma understandingbarriersforresearchinvolvementamongpaediatrictraineesamixedmethodsstudy AT glaseradam understandingbarriersforresearchinvolvementamongpaediatrictraineesamixedmethodsstudy AT andrewsjacqueline understandingbarriersforresearchinvolvementamongpaediatrictraineesamixedmethodsstudy |