Cargando…

The utility of patient reported data in a gynecologic oncology clinic

BACKGROUND: Measuring QoL is essential to the field of gynecologic oncology but there seems to be limited standardized data regarding collecting QoL assessments throughout a patient’s cancer treatment especially in non-clinical trial patients. The aim of this study is to explore patient characterist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnes, D., Rivera, R., Gibson, S., Craig, C., Cragun, J., Monk, B., Chase, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30009038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40661-018-0062-4
_version_ 1783339410557763584
author Barnes, D.
Rivera, R.
Gibson, S.
Craig, C.
Cragun, J.
Monk, B.
Chase, D.
author_facet Barnes, D.
Rivera, R.
Gibson, S.
Craig, C.
Cragun, J.
Monk, B.
Chase, D.
author_sort Barnes, D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Measuring QoL is essential to the field of gynecologic oncology but there seems to be limited standardized data regarding collecting QoL assessments throughout a patient’s cancer treatment especially in non-clinical trial patients. The aim of this study is to explore patient characteristics that may be associated with poor quality of life (QoL) in women with gynecologic cancers at two University of Arizona Cancer Center (UACC) sites. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among English speaking women with gynecologic malignancies at the University of Arizona Cancer Centers in Phoenix and Tucson from April 2012 to July 2015. The survey was a paper packet of questions that was distributed to cancer patients at the time of their clinic visit. The packet contained questions on demographic information, treatment, lifestyle characteristics, pelvic pain and Health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Measures included the generic and cancer-specific scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General (FACT-G) and the Female Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI). The total scores and subdomains were compared with descriptive variables (age, body mass index (BMI), diet, exercise, disease status, treatment and support group attendance) using Cronbach alpha (α), Spearman rank correlations (ρ), and Holm’s Bonferroni method. RESULTS: One–hundred and forty-nine women completed the survey; 55% (N = 81) were older than 60 years, 38% (N = 45) were obese (BMI > 30), 46% (N = 66) exercised daily, and 84% (N = 111) ate one or more daily serving of fruit and vegetables. Women in remission, those who exercised daily and ate fruits/vegetables were less likely to have their symptoms impact their QoL. Younger women were more likely to report genitourinary issues (p = − 0.22) and overall problems with QoL (p = − 0.29) than older women. Among FACT-G support group responses, we found those that did not attend support groups had a significantly higher emotional wellbeing (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified potential areas of clinical focus, which aid in understanding our approach to caring for gynecologic cancer patients and improvement of their HRQoL. We identified that age, pelvic pain, and lifestyle characteristics have indicators to poor QoL in women with gynecologic cancers. In this population, younger women and those with pelvic pain complaints, poor diet and exercise habits should be targeted early for supportive care interventions to improve QoL throughout both treatment and survivorship.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6044081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60440812018-07-15 The utility of patient reported data in a gynecologic oncology clinic Barnes, D. Rivera, R. Gibson, S. Craig, C. Cragun, J. Monk, B. Chase, D. Gynecol Oncol Res Pract Research BACKGROUND: Measuring QoL is essential to the field of gynecologic oncology but there seems to be limited standardized data regarding collecting QoL assessments throughout a patient’s cancer treatment especially in non-clinical trial patients. The aim of this study is to explore patient characteristics that may be associated with poor quality of life (QoL) in women with gynecologic cancers at two University of Arizona Cancer Center (UACC) sites. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among English speaking women with gynecologic malignancies at the University of Arizona Cancer Centers in Phoenix and Tucson from April 2012 to July 2015. The survey was a paper packet of questions that was distributed to cancer patients at the time of their clinic visit. The packet contained questions on demographic information, treatment, lifestyle characteristics, pelvic pain and Health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Measures included the generic and cancer-specific scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General (FACT-G) and the Female Genitourinary Pain Index (GUPI). The total scores and subdomains were compared with descriptive variables (age, body mass index (BMI), diet, exercise, disease status, treatment and support group attendance) using Cronbach alpha (α), Spearman rank correlations (ρ), and Holm’s Bonferroni method. RESULTS: One–hundred and forty-nine women completed the survey; 55% (N = 81) were older than 60 years, 38% (N = 45) were obese (BMI > 30), 46% (N = 66) exercised daily, and 84% (N = 111) ate one or more daily serving of fruit and vegetables. Women in remission, those who exercised daily and ate fruits/vegetables were less likely to have their symptoms impact their QoL. Younger women were more likely to report genitourinary issues (p = − 0.22) and overall problems with QoL (p = − 0.29) than older women. Among FACT-G support group responses, we found those that did not attend support groups had a significantly higher emotional wellbeing (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified potential areas of clinical focus, which aid in understanding our approach to caring for gynecologic cancer patients and improvement of their HRQoL. We identified that age, pelvic pain, and lifestyle characteristics have indicators to poor QoL in women with gynecologic cancers. In this population, younger women and those with pelvic pain complaints, poor diet and exercise habits should be targeted early for supportive care interventions to improve QoL throughout both treatment and survivorship. BioMed Central 2018-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6044081/ /pubmed/30009038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40661-018-0062-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Barnes, D.
Rivera, R.
Gibson, S.
Craig, C.
Cragun, J.
Monk, B.
Chase, D.
The utility of patient reported data in a gynecologic oncology clinic
title The utility of patient reported data in a gynecologic oncology clinic
title_full The utility of patient reported data in a gynecologic oncology clinic
title_fullStr The utility of patient reported data in a gynecologic oncology clinic
title_full_unstemmed The utility of patient reported data in a gynecologic oncology clinic
title_short The utility of patient reported data in a gynecologic oncology clinic
title_sort utility of patient reported data in a gynecologic oncology clinic
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30009038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40661-018-0062-4
work_keys_str_mv AT barnesd theutilityofpatientreporteddatainagynecologiconcologyclinic
AT riverar theutilityofpatientreporteddatainagynecologiconcologyclinic
AT gibsons theutilityofpatientreporteddatainagynecologiconcologyclinic
AT craigc theutilityofpatientreporteddatainagynecologiconcologyclinic
AT cragunj theutilityofpatientreporteddatainagynecologiconcologyclinic
AT monkb theutilityofpatientreporteddatainagynecologiconcologyclinic
AT chased theutilityofpatientreporteddatainagynecologiconcologyclinic
AT barnesd utilityofpatientreporteddatainagynecologiconcologyclinic
AT riverar utilityofpatientreporteddatainagynecologiconcologyclinic
AT gibsons utilityofpatientreporteddatainagynecologiconcologyclinic
AT craigc utilityofpatientreporteddatainagynecologiconcologyclinic
AT cragunj utilityofpatientreporteddatainagynecologiconcologyclinic
AT monkb utilityofpatientreporteddatainagynecologiconcologyclinic
AT chased utilityofpatientreporteddatainagynecologiconcologyclinic