Cargando…
Use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms
Here, we describe the production of a probiotic biofilm through three intermediate steps: (1) measurement of the adhesion capacity of 15 probiotic strains to evaluate their tendency to form biofilm on different surfaces (stainless steel, glass, and polycarbonate); (2) evaluation of the effects of pH...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018849 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4826 |
_version_ | 1783339453707714560 |
---|---|
author | Speranza, Barbara Liso, Arcangelo Corbo, Maria Rosaria |
author_facet | Speranza, Barbara Liso, Arcangelo Corbo, Maria Rosaria |
author_sort | Speranza, Barbara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Here, we describe the production of a probiotic biofilm through three intermediate steps: (1) measurement of the adhesion capacity of 15 probiotic strains to evaluate their tendency to form biofilm on different surfaces (stainless steel, glass, and polycarbonate); (2) evaluation of the effects of pH, temperature, cellular growth phase, agitation, and presence of surfactants on probiotic biofilm formation (BF) through the Design of Experiments (DoE) approach; (3) study of the effects of pH, temperature and surfactants concentration on probiotic BF using the Central Composite Design. Finally, we show that biofilms pre-formed by selected probiotics can delay the growth of pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes chosen as model organism. Among the tested strains, Bifidobacterium infantis DSM20088 and Lactobacillus reuteri DSM20016 were found to be as the probiotics able to ensure the greatest adhesion (over 6 Log CFU cm(2)) to the surfaces tested in a very short time (<24 h). Cellular growth phase and agitation of the medium were factors not affecting BF, pH exerted a very bland effect and a greater tendency to adhesion was observed when the temperature was about 30 °C. The results obtained in the last experimental phase suggest that our probiotic biofilms can be used as an efficient mean to delay the growth of L. monocytogenes: the λ phase length, in fact, was longer in samples containing probiotic biofilms (0.30–1.02 h) against 0.08 h observed in the control samples. A reduction of the maximum cell load was also observed (6.99–7.06 Log CFU mL(−1) against about 8 Log CFU mL(−1) observed in the control samples). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6044272 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60442722018-07-17 Use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms Speranza, Barbara Liso, Arcangelo Corbo, Maria Rosaria PeerJ Food Science and Technology Here, we describe the production of a probiotic biofilm through three intermediate steps: (1) measurement of the adhesion capacity of 15 probiotic strains to evaluate their tendency to form biofilm on different surfaces (stainless steel, glass, and polycarbonate); (2) evaluation of the effects of pH, temperature, cellular growth phase, agitation, and presence of surfactants on probiotic biofilm formation (BF) through the Design of Experiments (DoE) approach; (3) study of the effects of pH, temperature and surfactants concentration on probiotic BF using the Central Composite Design. Finally, we show that biofilms pre-formed by selected probiotics can delay the growth of pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes chosen as model organism. Among the tested strains, Bifidobacterium infantis DSM20088 and Lactobacillus reuteri DSM20016 were found to be as the probiotics able to ensure the greatest adhesion (over 6 Log CFU cm(2)) to the surfaces tested in a very short time (<24 h). Cellular growth phase and agitation of the medium were factors not affecting BF, pH exerted a very bland effect and a greater tendency to adhesion was observed when the temperature was about 30 °C. The results obtained in the last experimental phase suggest that our probiotic biofilms can be used as an efficient mean to delay the growth of L. monocytogenes: the λ phase length, in fact, was longer in samples containing probiotic biofilms (0.30–1.02 h) against 0.08 h observed in the control samples. A reduction of the maximum cell load was also observed (6.99–7.06 Log CFU mL(−1) against about 8 Log CFU mL(−1) observed in the control samples). PeerJ Inc. 2018-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6044272/ /pubmed/30018849 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4826 Text en © 2018 Speranza et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Food Science and Technology Speranza, Barbara Liso, Arcangelo Corbo, Maria Rosaria Use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms |
title | Use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms |
title_full | Use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms |
title_fullStr | Use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms |
title_short | Use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms |
title_sort | use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms |
topic | Food Science and Technology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018849 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4826 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT speranzabarbara useofdesignofexperimentstooptimizetheproductionofmicrobialprobioticbiofilms AT lisoarcangelo useofdesignofexperimentstooptimizetheproductionofmicrobialprobioticbiofilms AT corbomariarosaria useofdesignofexperimentstooptimizetheproductionofmicrobialprobioticbiofilms |