Cargando…

Use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms

Here, we describe the production of a probiotic biofilm through three intermediate steps: (1) measurement of the adhesion capacity of 15 probiotic strains to evaluate their tendency to form biofilm on different surfaces (stainless steel, glass, and polycarbonate); (2) evaluation of the effects of pH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Speranza, Barbara, Liso, Arcangelo, Corbo, Maria Rosaria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018849
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4826
_version_ 1783339453707714560
author Speranza, Barbara
Liso, Arcangelo
Corbo, Maria Rosaria
author_facet Speranza, Barbara
Liso, Arcangelo
Corbo, Maria Rosaria
author_sort Speranza, Barbara
collection PubMed
description Here, we describe the production of a probiotic biofilm through three intermediate steps: (1) measurement of the adhesion capacity of 15 probiotic strains to evaluate their tendency to form biofilm on different surfaces (stainless steel, glass, and polycarbonate); (2) evaluation of the effects of pH, temperature, cellular growth phase, agitation, and presence of surfactants on probiotic biofilm formation (BF) through the Design of Experiments (DoE) approach; (3) study of the effects of pH, temperature and surfactants concentration on probiotic BF using the Central Composite Design. Finally, we show that biofilms pre-formed by selected probiotics can delay the growth of pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes chosen as model organism. Among the tested strains, Bifidobacterium infantis DSM20088 and Lactobacillus reuteri DSM20016 were found to be as the probiotics able to ensure the greatest adhesion (over 6 Log CFU cm(2)) to the surfaces tested in a very short time (<24 h). Cellular growth phase and agitation of the medium were factors not affecting BF, pH exerted a very bland effect and a greater tendency to adhesion was observed when the temperature was about 30 °C. The results obtained in the last experimental phase suggest that our probiotic biofilms can be used as an efficient mean to delay the growth of L. monocytogenes: the λ phase length, in fact, was longer in samples containing probiotic biofilms (0.30–1.02 h) against 0.08 h observed in the control samples. A reduction of the maximum cell load was also observed (6.99–7.06 Log CFU mL(−1) against about 8 Log CFU mL(−1) observed in the control samples).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6044272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60442722018-07-17 Use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms Speranza, Barbara Liso, Arcangelo Corbo, Maria Rosaria PeerJ Food Science and Technology Here, we describe the production of a probiotic biofilm through three intermediate steps: (1) measurement of the adhesion capacity of 15 probiotic strains to evaluate their tendency to form biofilm on different surfaces (stainless steel, glass, and polycarbonate); (2) evaluation of the effects of pH, temperature, cellular growth phase, agitation, and presence of surfactants on probiotic biofilm formation (BF) through the Design of Experiments (DoE) approach; (3) study of the effects of pH, temperature and surfactants concentration on probiotic BF using the Central Composite Design. Finally, we show that biofilms pre-formed by selected probiotics can delay the growth of pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes chosen as model organism. Among the tested strains, Bifidobacterium infantis DSM20088 and Lactobacillus reuteri DSM20016 were found to be as the probiotics able to ensure the greatest adhesion (over 6 Log CFU cm(2)) to the surfaces tested in a very short time (<24 h). Cellular growth phase and agitation of the medium were factors not affecting BF, pH exerted a very bland effect and a greater tendency to adhesion was observed when the temperature was about 30 °C. The results obtained in the last experimental phase suggest that our probiotic biofilms can be used as an efficient mean to delay the growth of L. monocytogenes: the λ phase length, in fact, was longer in samples containing probiotic biofilms (0.30–1.02 h) against 0.08 h observed in the control samples. A reduction of the maximum cell load was also observed (6.99–7.06 Log CFU mL(−1) against about 8 Log CFU mL(−1) observed in the control samples). PeerJ Inc. 2018-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6044272/ /pubmed/30018849 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4826 Text en © 2018 Speranza et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Food Science and Technology
Speranza, Barbara
Liso, Arcangelo
Corbo, Maria Rosaria
Use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms
title Use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms
title_full Use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms
title_fullStr Use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms
title_full_unstemmed Use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms
title_short Use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms
title_sort use of design of experiments to optimize the production of microbial probiotic biofilms
topic Food Science and Technology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018849
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4826
work_keys_str_mv AT speranzabarbara useofdesignofexperimentstooptimizetheproductionofmicrobialprobioticbiofilms
AT lisoarcangelo useofdesignofexperimentstooptimizetheproductionofmicrobialprobioticbiofilms
AT corbomariarosaria useofdesignofexperimentstooptimizetheproductionofmicrobialprobioticbiofilms