Cargando…

The Surgical Management of Pilonidal Disease is Uncertain Because of High Recurrence Rates

Background Pilonidal disease is a common condition with no consensus for the best management of chronic disease or current practice in Australia and New Zealand. Methods A survey was distributed among 190 colorectal and 592 general surgeons in Australia and New Zealand. Data was obtained regarding p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burnett, David, Smith, Stephen R, Young, Christopher J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30027017
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2625
_version_ 1783339481123782656
author Burnett, David
Smith, Stephen R
Young, Christopher J
author_facet Burnett, David
Smith, Stephen R
Young, Christopher J
author_sort Burnett, David
collection PubMed
description Background Pilonidal disease is a common condition with no consensus for the best management of chronic disease or current practice in Australia and New Zealand. Methods A survey was distributed among 190 colorectal and 592 general surgeons in Australia and New Zealand. Data was obtained regarding pilonidal surgery volume, procedures performed, non-operative management and recurrence rates. Three clinical scenarios were also presented. Results The response rate was 58% among colorectal surgeons, 18% among general surgeons. Nineteen percent of surgeons were high-volume (>23 operations per year), 47% low-volume (<12 operations per year). The commonest procedure was the Karydakis procedure (77%), with many others performed including rhomboid flaps (36%), Bascom cleft lift (13%), Z-plasty (7%), and gluteal rotation flaps (5%). Fifty-five percent of high-volume surgeons offered more than one operation while only 16% of low-volume surgeons did. Nineteen percent operated on all patients with pilonidal disease, 89% believing off-midline closure to be superior to midline. Disease extent was the main driver for non-operative management; patient factors such as cosmesis and time-off work being the least important. Sixty-four percent reported recurrence rates above 5%, and 37% recurrence rates >10%. Six percent reported no recurrences ever. Five percent reported recurrence rates over 20%, but 24% stated that over one-fifth of their practice consists of recurrent disease. Conclusions This study reports higher recurrence rates than in published series, suggesting many surgeons do not see their own recurrences, with current treatment not as successful as previously thought. Combined with the widespread variation in practice, optimal management of this disease remains unclear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6044486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60444862018-07-19 The Surgical Management of Pilonidal Disease is Uncertain Because of High Recurrence Rates Burnett, David Smith, Stephen R Young, Christopher J Cureus Family/General Practice Background Pilonidal disease is a common condition with no consensus for the best management of chronic disease or current practice in Australia and New Zealand. Methods A survey was distributed among 190 colorectal and 592 general surgeons in Australia and New Zealand. Data was obtained regarding pilonidal surgery volume, procedures performed, non-operative management and recurrence rates. Three clinical scenarios were also presented. Results The response rate was 58% among colorectal surgeons, 18% among general surgeons. Nineteen percent of surgeons were high-volume (>23 operations per year), 47% low-volume (<12 operations per year). The commonest procedure was the Karydakis procedure (77%), with many others performed including rhomboid flaps (36%), Bascom cleft lift (13%), Z-plasty (7%), and gluteal rotation flaps (5%). Fifty-five percent of high-volume surgeons offered more than one operation while only 16% of low-volume surgeons did. Nineteen percent operated on all patients with pilonidal disease, 89% believing off-midline closure to be superior to midline. Disease extent was the main driver for non-operative management; patient factors such as cosmesis and time-off work being the least important. Sixty-four percent reported recurrence rates above 5%, and 37% recurrence rates >10%. Six percent reported no recurrences ever. Five percent reported recurrence rates over 20%, but 24% stated that over one-fifth of their practice consists of recurrent disease. Conclusions This study reports higher recurrence rates than in published series, suggesting many surgeons do not see their own recurrences, with current treatment not as successful as previously thought. Combined with the widespread variation in practice, optimal management of this disease remains unclear. Cureus 2018-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6044486/ /pubmed/30027017 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2625 Text en Copyright © 2018, Burnett et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Family/General Practice
Burnett, David
Smith, Stephen R
Young, Christopher J
The Surgical Management of Pilonidal Disease is Uncertain Because of High Recurrence Rates
title The Surgical Management of Pilonidal Disease is Uncertain Because of High Recurrence Rates
title_full The Surgical Management of Pilonidal Disease is Uncertain Because of High Recurrence Rates
title_fullStr The Surgical Management of Pilonidal Disease is Uncertain Because of High Recurrence Rates
title_full_unstemmed The Surgical Management of Pilonidal Disease is Uncertain Because of High Recurrence Rates
title_short The Surgical Management of Pilonidal Disease is Uncertain Because of High Recurrence Rates
title_sort surgical management of pilonidal disease is uncertain because of high recurrence rates
topic Family/General Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30027017
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2625
work_keys_str_mv AT burnettdavid thesurgicalmanagementofpilonidaldiseaseisuncertainbecauseofhighrecurrencerates
AT smithstephenr thesurgicalmanagementofpilonidaldiseaseisuncertainbecauseofhighrecurrencerates
AT youngchristopherj thesurgicalmanagementofpilonidaldiseaseisuncertainbecauseofhighrecurrencerates
AT burnettdavid surgicalmanagementofpilonidaldiseaseisuncertainbecauseofhighrecurrencerates
AT smithstephenr surgicalmanagementofpilonidaldiseaseisuncertainbecauseofhighrecurrencerates
AT youngchristopherj surgicalmanagementofpilonidaldiseaseisuncertainbecauseofhighrecurrencerates