Cargando…
Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using Free-Energy Perturbation
[Image: see text] The rapid growth of structural information for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has led to a greater understanding of their structure, function, selectivity, and ligand binding. Although novel ligands have been identified using methods such as virtual screening, computationally...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2016
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30023478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.6b00086 |
_version_ | 1783339509537046528 |
---|---|
author | Lenselink, Eelke B. Louvel, Julien Forti, Anna F. van Veldhoven, Jacobus P. D. de Vries, Henk Mulder-Krieger, Thea McRobb, Fiona M. Negri, Ana Goose, Joseph Abel, Robert van Vlijmen, Herman W. T. Wang, Lingle Harder, Edward Sherman, Woody IJzerman, Adriaan P. Beuming, Thijs |
author_facet | Lenselink, Eelke B. Louvel, Julien Forti, Anna F. van Veldhoven, Jacobus P. D. de Vries, Henk Mulder-Krieger, Thea McRobb, Fiona M. Negri, Ana Goose, Joseph Abel, Robert van Vlijmen, Herman W. T. Wang, Lingle Harder, Edward Sherman, Woody IJzerman, Adriaan P. Beuming, Thijs |
author_sort | Lenselink, Eelke B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The rapid growth of structural information for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has led to a greater understanding of their structure, function, selectivity, and ligand binding. Although novel ligands have been identified using methods such as virtual screening, computationally driven lead optimization has been possible only in isolated cases because of challenges associated with predicting binding free energies for related compounds. Here, we provide a systematic characterization of the performance of free-energy perturbation (FEP) calculations to predict relative binding free energies of congeneric ligands binding to GPCR targets using a consistent protocol and no adjustable parameters. Using the FEP+ package, first we validated the protocol, which includes a full lipid bilayer and explicit solvent, by predicting the binding affinity for a total of 45 different ligands across four different GPCRs (adenosine A(2A)AR, β(1) adrenergic, CXCR4 chemokine, and δ opioid receptors). Comparison with experimental binding affinity measurements revealed a highly predictive ranking correlation (average spearman ρ = 0.55) and low root-mean-square error (0.80 kcal/mol). Next, we applied FEP+ in a prospective project, where we predicted the affinity of novel, potent adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R) antagonists. Four novel compounds were synthesized and tested in a radioligand displacement assay, yielding affinity values in the nanomolar range. The affinity of two out of the four novel ligands (plus three previously reported compounds) was correctly predicted (within 1 kcal/mol), including one compound with approximately a tenfold increase in affinity compared to the starting compound. Detailed analyses of the simulations underlying the predictions provided insights into the structural basis for the two cases where the affinity was overpredicted. Taken together, these results establish a protocol for systematically applying FEP+ to GPCRs and provide guidelines for identifying potent molecules in drug discovery lead optimization projects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6044636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60446362018-07-16 Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using Free-Energy Perturbation Lenselink, Eelke B. Louvel, Julien Forti, Anna F. van Veldhoven, Jacobus P. D. de Vries, Henk Mulder-Krieger, Thea McRobb, Fiona M. Negri, Ana Goose, Joseph Abel, Robert van Vlijmen, Herman W. T. Wang, Lingle Harder, Edward Sherman, Woody IJzerman, Adriaan P. Beuming, Thijs ACS Omega [Image: see text] The rapid growth of structural information for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has led to a greater understanding of their structure, function, selectivity, and ligand binding. Although novel ligands have been identified using methods such as virtual screening, computationally driven lead optimization has been possible only in isolated cases because of challenges associated with predicting binding free energies for related compounds. Here, we provide a systematic characterization of the performance of free-energy perturbation (FEP) calculations to predict relative binding free energies of congeneric ligands binding to GPCR targets using a consistent protocol and no adjustable parameters. Using the FEP+ package, first we validated the protocol, which includes a full lipid bilayer and explicit solvent, by predicting the binding affinity for a total of 45 different ligands across four different GPCRs (adenosine A(2A)AR, β(1) adrenergic, CXCR4 chemokine, and δ opioid receptors). Comparison with experimental binding affinity measurements revealed a highly predictive ranking correlation (average spearman ρ = 0.55) and low root-mean-square error (0.80 kcal/mol). Next, we applied FEP+ in a prospective project, where we predicted the affinity of novel, potent adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R) antagonists. Four novel compounds were synthesized and tested in a radioligand displacement assay, yielding affinity values in the nanomolar range. The affinity of two out of the four novel ligands (plus three previously reported compounds) was correctly predicted (within 1 kcal/mol), including one compound with approximately a tenfold increase in affinity compared to the starting compound. Detailed analyses of the simulations underlying the predictions provided insights into the structural basis for the two cases where the affinity was overpredicted. Taken together, these results establish a protocol for systematically applying FEP+ to GPCRs and provide guidelines for identifying potent molecules in drug discovery lead optimization projects. American Chemical Society 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6044636/ /pubmed/30023478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.6b00086 Text en Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Lenselink, Eelke B. Louvel, Julien Forti, Anna F. van Veldhoven, Jacobus P. D. de Vries, Henk Mulder-Krieger, Thea McRobb, Fiona M. Negri, Ana Goose, Joseph Abel, Robert van Vlijmen, Herman W. T. Wang, Lingle Harder, Edward Sherman, Woody IJzerman, Adriaan P. Beuming, Thijs Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using Free-Energy Perturbation |
title | Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using
Free-Energy Perturbation |
title_full | Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using
Free-Energy Perturbation |
title_fullStr | Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using
Free-Energy Perturbation |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using
Free-Energy Perturbation |
title_short | Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using
Free-Energy Perturbation |
title_sort | predicting binding affinities for gpcr ligands using
free-energy perturbation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30023478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.6b00086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lenselinkeelkeb predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation AT louveljulien predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation AT fortiannaf predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation AT vanveldhovenjacobuspd predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation AT devrieshenk predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation AT mulderkriegerthea predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation AT mcrobbfionam predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation AT negriana predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation AT goosejoseph predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation AT abelrobert predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation AT vanvlijmenhermanwt predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation AT wanglingle predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation AT harderedward predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation AT shermanwoody predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation AT ijzermanadriaanp predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation AT beumingthijs predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation |