Cargando…

Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using Free-Energy Perturbation

[Image: see text] The rapid growth of structural information for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has led to a greater understanding of their structure, function, selectivity, and ligand binding. Although novel ligands have been identified using methods such as virtual screening, computationally...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lenselink, Eelke B., Louvel, Julien, Forti, Anna F., van Veldhoven, Jacobus P. D., de Vries, Henk, Mulder-Krieger, Thea, McRobb, Fiona M., Negri, Ana, Goose, Joseph, Abel, Robert, van Vlijmen, Herman W. T., Wang, Lingle, Harder, Edward, Sherman, Woody, IJzerman, Adriaan P., Beuming, Thijs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2016
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30023478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.6b00086
_version_ 1783339509537046528
author Lenselink, Eelke B.
Louvel, Julien
Forti, Anna F.
van Veldhoven, Jacobus P. D.
de Vries, Henk
Mulder-Krieger, Thea
McRobb, Fiona M.
Negri, Ana
Goose, Joseph
Abel, Robert
van Vlijmen, Herman W. T.
Wang, Lingle
Harder, Edward
Sherman, Woody
IJzerman, Adriaan P.
Beuming, Thijs
author_facet Lenselink, Eelke B.
Louvel, Julien
Forti, Anna F.
van Veldhoven, Jacobus P. D.
de Vries, Henk
Mulder-Krieger, Thea
McRobb, Fiona M.
Negri, Ana
Goose, Joseph
Abel, Robert
van Vlijmen, Herman W. T.
Wang, Lingle
Harder, Edward
Sherman, Woody
IJzerman, Adriaan P.
Beuming, Thijs
author_sort Lenselink, Eelke B.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The rapid growth of structural information for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has led to a greater understanding of their structure, function, selectivity, and ligand binding. Although novel ligands have been identified using methods such as virtual screening, computationally driven lead optimization has been possible only in isolated cases because of challenges associated with predicting binding free energies for related compounds. Here, we provide a systematic characterization of the performance of free-energy perturbation (FEP) calculations to predict relative binding free energies of congeneric ligands binding to GPCR targets using a consistent protocol and no adjustable parameters. Using the FEP+ package, first we validated the protocol, which includes a full lipid bilayer and explicit solvent, by predicting the binding affinity for a total of 45 different ligands across four different GPCRs (adenosine A(2A)AR, β(1) adrenergic, CXCR4 chemokine, and δ opioid receptors). Comparison with experimental binding affinity measurements revealed a highly predictive ranking correlation (average spearman ρ = 0.55) and low root-mean-square error (0.80 kcal/mol). Next, we applied FEP+ in a prospective project, where we predicted the affinity of novel, potent adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R) antagonists. Four novel compounds were synthesized and tested in a radioligand displacement assay, yielding affinity values in the nanomolar range. The affinity of two out of the four novel ligands (plus three previously reported compounds) was correctly predicted (within 1 kcal/mol), including one compound with approximately a tenfold increase in affinity compared to the starting compound. Detailed analyses of the simulations underlying the predictions provided insights into the structural basis for the two cases where the affinity was overpredicted. Taken together, these results establish a protocol for systematically applying FEP+ to GPCRs and provide guidelines for identifying potent molecules in drug discovery lead optimization projects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6044636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60446362018-07-16 Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using Free-Energy Perturbation Lenselink, Eelke B. Louvel, Julien Forti, Anna F. van Veldhoven, Jacobus P. D. de Vries, Henk Mulder-Krieger, Thea McRobb, Fiona M. Negri, Ana Goose, Joseph Abel, Robert van Vlijmen, Herman W. T. Wang, Lingle Harder, Edward Sherman, Woody IJzerman, Adriaan P. Beuming, Thijs ACS Omega [Image: see text] The rapid growth of structural information for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has led to a greater understanding of their structure, function, selectivity, and ligand binding. Although novel ligands have been identified using methods such as virtual screening, computationally driven lead optimization has been possible only in isolated cases because of challenges associated with predicting binding free energies for related compounds. Here, we provide a systematic characterization of the performance of free-energy perturbation (FEP) calculations to predict relative binding free energies of congeneric ligands binding to GPCR targets using a consistent protocol and no adjustable parameters. Using the FEP+ package, first we validated the protocol, which includes a full lipid bilayer and explicit solvent, by predicting the binding affinity for a total of 45 different ligands across four different GPCRs (adenosine A(2A)AR, β(1) adrenergic, CXCR4 chemokine, and δ opioid receptors). Comparison with experimental binding affinity measurements revealed a highly predictive ranking correlation (average spearman ρ = 0.55) and low root-mean-square error (0.80 kcal/mol). Next, we applied FEP+ in a prospective project, where we predicted the affinity of novel, potent adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R) antagonists. Four novel compounds were synthesized and tested in a radioligand displacement assay, yielding affinity values in the nanomolar range. The affinity of two out of the four novel ligands (plus three previously reported compounds) was correctly predicted (within 1 kcal/mol), including one compound with approximately a tenfold increase in affinity compared to the starting compound. Detailed analyses of the simulations underlying the predictions provided insights into the structural basis for the two cases where the affinity was overpredicted. Taken together, these results establish a protocol for systematically applying FEP+ to GPCRs and provide guidelines for identifying potent molecules in drug discovery lead optimization projects. American Chemical Society 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6044636/ /pubmed/30023478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.6b00086 Text en Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Lenselink, Eelke B.
Louvel, Julien
Forti, Anna F.
van Veldhoven, Jacobus P. D.
de Vries, Henk
Mulder-Krieger, Thea
McRobb, Fiona M.
Negri, Ana
Goose, Joseph
Abel, Robert
van Vlijmen, Herman W. T.
Wang, Lingle
Harder, Edward
Sherman, Woody
IJzerman, Adriaan P.
Beuming, Thijs
Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using Free-Energy Perturbation
title Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using Free-Energy Perturbation
title_full Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using Free-Energy Perturbation
title_fullStr Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using Free-Energy Perturbation
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using Free-Energy Perturbation
title_short Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using Free-Energy Perturbation
title_sort predicting binding affinities for gpcr ligands using free-energy perturbation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30023478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.6b00086
work_keys_str_mv AT lenselinkeelkeb predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation
AT louveljulien predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation
AT fortiannaf predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation
AT vanveldhovenjacobuspd predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation
AT devrieshenk predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation
AT mulderkriegerthea predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation
AT mcrobbfionam predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation
AT negriana predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation
AT goosejoseph predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation
AT abelrobert predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation
AT vanvlijmenhermanwt predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation
AT wanglingle predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation
AT harderedward predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation
AT shermanwoody predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation
AT ijzermanadriaanp predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation
AT beumingthijs predictingbindingaffinitiesforgpcrligandsusingfreeenergyperturbation