Cargando…

Discrepancies between Cyclic and Linear Antimicrobial Peptide Actions on the Spectrochemical and Nanomechanical Fingerprints of a Young Biofilm

[Image: see text] Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are currently known for their potential as an alternative to conventional antibiotics and new weapons against drug-resistant bacteria and biofilms. In the present work, the mechanism of action of a cyclic (colistin) and a linear (catestatin) AMP on a y...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freudenthal, Oona, Quilès, Fabienne, Francius, Grégory
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30023754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b00644
_version_ 1783339537939824640
author Freudenthal, Oona
Quilès, Fabienne
Francius, Grégory
author_facet Freudenthal, Oona
Quilès, Fabienne
Francius, Grégory
author_sort Freudenthal, Oona
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are currently known for their potential as an alternative to conventional antibiotics and new weapons against drug-resistant bacteria and biofilms. In the present work, the mechanism of action of a cyclic (colistin) and a linear (catestatin) AMP on a young E. coli biofilm was deciphered from the molecular to the cellular scale. To this end, infrared spectroscopy (attenuated total reflection–Fourier transform infrared) assisted by chemometric analysis was combined with fluorescence and atomic force microscopies to address the very different behaviors of both AMPs. Indeed, the colistin dramatically damaged the bacterial cell wall and the metabolism even though its action was not homogeneous over the whole bacterial population and repopulation can be observed after peptide removal. Conversely, catestatin did not lead to major damages in the bacterial morphology but its action was homogeneous over the whole bacterial population and the cells were unable to regrow after the peptide treatment. Our results strongly suggested that contrary to the cyclic molecule, the linear one is able to cause irreversible damages in the bacterial membrane concomitantly to a strong impact on the bacterial metabolism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6044769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60447692018-07-16 Discrepancies between Cyclic and Linear Antimicrobial Peptide Actions on the Spectrochemical and Nanomechanical Fingerprints of a Young Biofilm Freudenthal, Oona Quilès, Fabienne Francius, Grégory ACS Omega [Image: see text] Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are currently known for their potential as an alternative to conventional antibiotics and new weapons against drug-resistant bacteria and biofilms. In the present work, the mechanism of action of a cyclic (colistin) and a linear (catestatin) AMP on a young E. coli biofilm was deciphered from the molecular to the cellular scale. To this end, infrared spectroscopy (attenuated total reflection–Fourier transform infrared) assisted by chemometric analysis was combined with fluorescence and atomic force microscopies to address the very different behaviors of both AMPs. Indeed, the colistin dramatically damaged the bacterial cell wall and the metabolism even though its action was not homogeneous over the whole bacterial population and repopulation can be observed after peptide removal. Conversely, catestatin did not lead to major damages in the bacterial morphology but its action was homogeneous over the whole bacterial population and the cells were unable to regrow after the peptide treatment. Our results strongly suggested that contrary to the cyclic molecule, the linear one is able to cause irreversible damages in the bacterial membrane concomitantly to a strong impact on the bacterial metabolism. American Chemical Society 2017-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6044769/ /pubmed/30023754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b00644 Text en Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Freudenthal, Oona
Quilès, Fabienne
Francius, Grégory
Discrepancies between Cyclic and Linear Antimicrobial Peptide Actions on the Spectrochemical and Nanomechanical Fingerprints of a Young Biofilm
title Discrepancies between Cyclic and Linear Antimicrobial Peptide Actions on the Spectrochemical and Nanomechanical Fingerprints of a Young Biofilm
title_full Discrepancies between Cyclic and Linear Antimicrobial Peptide Actions on the Spectrochemical and Nanomechanical Fingerprints of a Young Biofilm
title_fullStr Discrepancies between Cyclic and Linear Antimicrobial Peptide Actions on the Spectrochemical and Nanomechanical Fingerprints of a Young Biofilm
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancies between Cyclic and Linear Antimicrobial Peptide Actions on the Spectrochemical and Nanomechanical Fingerprints of a Young Biofilm
title_short Discrepancies between Cyclic and Linear Antimicrobial Peptide Actions on the Spectrochemical and Nanomechanical Fingerprints of a Young Biofilm
title_sort discrepancies between cyclic and linear antimicrobial peptide actions on the spectrochemical and nanomechanical fingerprints of a young biofilm
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30023754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b00644
work_keys_str_mv AT freudenthaloona discrepanciesbetweencyclicandlinearantimicrobialpeptideactionsonthespectrochemicalandnanomechanicalfingerprintsofayoungbiofilm
AT quilesfabienne discrepanciesbetweencyclicandlinearantimicrobialpeptideactionsonthespectrochemicalandnanomechanicalfingerprintsofayoungbiofilm
AT franciusgregory discrepanciesbetweencyclicandlinearantimicrobialpeptideactionsonthespectrochemicalandnanomechanicalfingerprintsofayoungbiofilm