Cargando…

IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG)

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) records weak magnetic fields outside the human head and thereby provides millisecond-accurate information about neuronal currents supporting human brain function. MEG and electroencephalography (EEG) are closely related complementary methods and should be interpreted tog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hari, Riitta, Baillet, Sylvain, Barnes, Gareth, Burgess, Richard, Forss, Nina, Gross, Joachim, Hämäläinen, Matti, Jensen, Ole, Kakigi, Ryusuke, Mauguière, François, Nakasato, Nobukatzu, Puce, Aina, Romani, Gian-Luca, Schnitzler, Alfons, Taulu, Samu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6045462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29724661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2018.03.042
_version_ 1783339667292160000
author Hari, Riitta
Baillet, Sylvain
Barnes, Gareth
Burgess, Richard
Forss, Nina
Gross, Joachim
Hämäläinen, Matti
Jensen, Ole
Kakigi, Ryusuke
Mauguière, François
Nakasato, Nobukatzu
Puce, Aina
Romani, Gian-Luca
Schnitzler, Alfons
Taulu, Samu
author_facet Hari, Riitta
Baillet, Sylvain
Barnes, Gareth
Burgess, Richard
Forss, Nina
Gross, Joachim
Hämäläinen, Matti
Jensen, Ole
Kakigi, Ryusuke
Mauguière, François
Nakasato, Nobukatzu
Puce, Aina
Romani, Gian-Luca
Schnitzler, Alfons
Taulu, Samu
author_sort Hari, Riitta
collection PubMed
description Magnetoencephalography (MEG) records weak magnetic fields outside the human head and thereby provides millisecond-accurate information about neuronal currents supporting human brain function. MEG and electroencephalography (EEG) are closely related complementary methods and should be interpreted together whenever possible. This manuscript covers the basic physical and physiological principles of MEG and discusses the main aspects of state-of-the-art MEG data analysis. We provide guidelines for best practices of patient preparation, stimulus presentation, MEG data collection and analysis, as well as for MEG interpretation in routine clinical examinations. In 2017, about 200 whole-scalp MEG devices were in operation worldwide, many of them located in clinical environments. Yet, the established clinical indications for MEG examinations remain few, mainly restricted to the diagnostics of epilepsy and to preoperative functional evaluation of neurosurgical patients. We are confident that the extensive ongoing basic MEG research indicates potential for the evaluation of neurological and psychiatric syndromes, developmental disorders, and the integrity of cortical brain networks after stroke. Basic and clinical research is, thus, paving way for new clinical applications to be identified by an increasing number of practitioners of MEG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6045462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60454622018-10-05 IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG) Hari, Riitta Baillet, Sylvain Barnes, Gareth Burgess, Richard Forss, Nina Gross, Joachim Hämäläinen, Matti Jensen, Ole Kakigi, Ryusuke Mauguière, François Nakasato, Nobukatzu Puce, Aina Romani, Gian-Luca Schnitzler, Alfons Taulu, Samu Clin Neurophysiol Article Magnetoencephalography (MEG) records weak magnetic fields outside the human head and thereby provides millisecond-accurate information about neuronal currents supporting human brain function. MEG and electroencephalography (EEG) are closely related complementary methods and should be interpreted together whenever possible. This manuscript covers the basic physical and physiological principles of MEG and discusses the main aspects of state-of-the-art MEG data analysis. We provide guidelines for best practices of patient preparation, stimulus presentation, MEG data collection and analysis, as well as for MEG interpretation in routine clinical examinations. In 2017, about 200 whole-scalp MEG devices were in operation worldwide, many of them located in clinical environments. Yet, the established clinical indications for MEG examinations remain few, mainly restricted to the diagnostics of epilepsy and to preoperative functional evaluation of neurosurgical patients. We are confident that the extensive ongoing basic MEG research indicates potential for the evaluation of neurological and psychiatric syndromes, developmental disorders, and the integrity of cortical brain networks after stroke. Basic and clinical research is, thus, paving way for new clinical applications to be identified by an increasing number of practitioners of MEG. Elsevier 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6045462/ /pubmed/29724661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2018.03.042 Text en © 2018 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hari, Riitta
Baillet, Sylvain
Barnes, Gareth
Burgess, Richard
Forss, Nina
Gross, Joachim
Hämäläinen, Matti
Jensen, Ole
Kakigi, Ryusuke
Mauguière, François
Nakasato, Nobukatzu
Puce, Aina
Romani, Gian-Luca
Schnitzler, Alfons
Taulu, Samu
IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG)
title IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG)
title_full IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG)
title_fullStr IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG)
title_full_unstemmed IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG)
title_short IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG)
title_sort ifcn-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (meg)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6045462/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29724661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2018.03.042
work_keys_str_mv AT haririitta ifcnendorsedpracticalguidelinesforclinicalmagnetoencephalographymeg
AT bailletsylvain ifcnendorsedpracticalguidelinesforclinicalmagnetoencephalographymeg
AT barnesgareth ifcnendorsedpracticalguidelinesforclinicalmagnetoencephalographymeg
AT burgessrichard ifcnendorsedpracticalguidelinesforclinicalmagnetoencephalographymeg
AT forssnina ifcnendorsedpracticalguidelinesforclinicalmagnetoencephalographymeg
AT grossjoachim ifcnendorsedpracticalguidelinesforclinicalmagnetoencephalographymeg
AT hamalainenmatti ifcnendorsedpracticalguidelinesforclinicalmagnetoencephalographymeg
AT jensenole ifcnendorsedpracticalguidelinesforclinicalmagnetoencephalographymeg
AT kakigiryusuke ifcnendorsedpracticalguidelinesforclinicalmagnetoencephalographymeg
AT mauguierefrancois ifcnendorsedpracticalguidelinesforclinicalmagnetoencephalographymeg
AT nakasatonobukatzu ifcnendorsedpracticalguidelinesforclinicalmagnetoencephalographymeg
AT puceaina ifcnendorsedpracticalguidelinesforclinicalmagnetoencephalographymeg
AT romanigianluca ifcnendorsedpracticalguidelinesforclinicalmagnetoencephalographymeg
AT schnitzleralfons ifcnendorsedpracticalguidelinesforclinicalmagnetoencephalographymeg
AT taulusamu ifcnendorsedpracticalguidelinesforclinicalmagnetoencephalographymeg