Cargando…

Implementation of a whole of hospital sepsis clinical pathway in a cancer hospital: impact on sepsis management, outcomes and costs

Infection and sepsis are common problems in cancer management affecting up to 45% of patients and are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare utilisation. OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a whole of hospital clinical pathway for the management of sepsis (SP) in a specialis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thursky, Karin, Lingaratnam, Senthil, Jayarajan, Jasveer, Haeusler, Gabrielle M, Teh, Benjamin, Tew, Michelle, Venn, Georgina, Hiong, Alison, Brown, Christine, Leung, Vivian, Worth, Leon J, Dalziel, Kim, Slavin, Monica A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6045757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30019016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000355
_version_ 1783339721675505664
author Thursky, Karin
Lingaratnam, Senthil
Jayarajan, Jasveer
Haeusler, Gabrielle M
Teh, Benjamin
Tew, Michelle
Venn, Georgina
Hiong, Alison
Brown, Christine
Leung, Vivian
Worth, Leon J
Dalziel, Kim
Slavin, Monica A
author_facet Thursky, Karin
Lingaratnam, Senthil
Jayarajan, Jasveer
Haeusler, Gabrielle M
Teh, Benjamin
Tew, Michelle
Venn, Georgina
Hiong, Alison
Brown, Christine
Leung, Vivian
Worth, Leon J
Dalziel, Kim
Slavin, Monica A
author_sort Thursky, Karin
collection PubMed
description Infection and sepsis are common problems in cancer management affecting up to 45% of patients and are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare utilisation. OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a whole of hospital clinical pathway for the management of sepsis (SP) in a specialised cancer hospital and to measure the impact on patient outcomes and healthcare utilisation. METHODS: A multidisciplinary sepsis working party was established. Process mapping of practices for recognition and management of sepsis was undertaken across all clinical areas. A clinical pathway document that supported nurse-initiated sepsis care, prompt antibiotic and fluid resuscitation was implemented. Process and outcome measures for patients with sepsis were collected preimplementation (April–December 2012), postimplementation cohorts (April–December 2013), and from January to December 2014. RESULTS: 323 patients were evaluated (111 preimplementation, 212 postimplementation). More patients with sepsis had lactate measured (75.0% vs 17.2%) and appropriate first dose antibiotic (90.1% vs 76.1%) (all p<0.05). Time to antibiotics was halved (55 vs 110 min, p<0.05). Patients with sepsis had lower rates of intensive care unit admission (17.1% vs 35.5%), postsepsis length of stay (7.5 vs 9.9 days), and sepsis-related mortality (5.0% vs 16.2%) (all p<0.05). Mean total hospital admission costs were lower in the SP cohort, with a significant difference in admission costs between historical and SP non-surgical groups of $A8363 (95% CI 81.02 to 16645.32, p=0.048) per patient on the pathway. A second cohort of 449 patients with sepsis from January to December 2014 demonstrated sustained improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The SP was associated with significant improvement in patient outcomes and reduced costs. The SP has been sustained since 2013, and has been successfully implemented in another hospital with further implementations underway in Victoria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6045757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60457572018-07-17 Implementation of a whole of hospital sepsis clinical pathway in a cancer hospital: impact on sepsis management, outcomes and costs Thursky, Karin Lingaratnam, Senthil Jayarajan, Jasveer Haeusler, Gabrielle M Teh, Benjamin Tew, Michelle Venn, Georgina Hiong, Alison Brown, Christine Leung, Vivian Worth, Leon J Dalziel, Kim Slavin, Monica A BMJ Open Qual Original Article Infection and sepsis are common problems in cancer management affecting up to 45% of patients and are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare utilisation. OBJECTIVE: To develop and implement a whole of hospital clinical pathway for the management of sepsis (SP) in a specialised cancer hospital and to measure the impact on patient outcomes and healthcare utilisation. METHODS: A multidisciplinary sepsis working party was established. Process mapping of practices for recognition and management of sepsis was undertaken across all clinical areas. A clinical pathway document that supported nurse-initiated sepsis care, prompt antibiotic and fluid resuscitation was implemented. Process and outcome measures for patients with sepsis were collected preimplementation (April–December 2012), postimplementation cohorts (April–December 2013), and from January to December 2014. RESULTS: 323 patients were evaluated (111 preimplementation, 212 postimplementation). More patients with sepsis had lactate measured (75.0% vs 17.2%) and appropriate first dose antibiotic (90.1% vs 76.1%) (all p<0.05). Time to antibiotics was halved (55 vs 110 min, p<0.05). Patients with sepsis had lower rates of intensive care unit admission (17.1% vs 35.5%), postsepsis length of stay (7.5 vs 9.9 days), and sepsis-related mortality (5.0% vs 16.2%) (all p<0.05). Mean total hospital admission costs were lower in the SP cohort, with a significant difference in admission costs between historical and SP non-surgical groups of $A8363 (95% CI 81.02 to 16645.32, p=0.048) per patient on the pathway. A second cohort of 449 patients with sepsis from January to December 2014 demonstrated sustained improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The SP was associated with significant improvement in patient outcomes and reduced costs. The SP has been sustained since 2013, and has been successfully implemented in another hospital with further implementations underway in Victoria. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6045757/ /pubmed/30019016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000355 Text en © Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Thursky, Karin
Lingaratnam, Senthil
Jayarajan, Jasveer
Haeusler, Gabrielle M
Teh, Benjamin
Tew, Michelle
Venn, Georgina
Hiong, Alison
Brown, Christine
Leung, Vivian
Worth, Leon J
Dalziel, Kim
Slavin, Monica A
Implementation of a whole of hospital sepsis clinical pathway in a cancer hospital: impact on sepsis management, outcomes and costs
title Implementation of a whole of hospital sepsis clinical pathway in a cancer hospital: impact on sepsis management, outcomes and costs
title_full Implementation of a whole of hospital sepsis clinical pathway in a cancer hospital: impact on sepsis management, outcomes and costs
title_fullStr Implementation of a whole of hospital sepsis clinical pathway in a cancer hospital: impact on sepsis management, outcomes and costs
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of a whole of hospital sepsis clinical pathway in a cancer hospital: impact on sepsis management, outcomes and costs
title_short Implementation of a whole of hospital sepsis clinical pathway in a cancer hospital: impact on sepsis management, outcomes and costs
title_sort implementation of a whole of hospital sepsis clinical pathway in a cancer hospital: impact on sepsis management, outcomes and costs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6045757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30019016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000355
work_keys_str_mv AT thurskykarin implementationofawholeofhospitalsepsisclinicalpathwayinacancerhospitalimpactonsepsismanagementoutcomesandcosts
AT lingaratnamsenthil implementationofawholeofhospitalsepsisclinicalpathwayinacancerhospitalimpactonsepsismanagementoutcomesandcosts
AT jayarajanjasveer implementationofawholeofhospitalsepsisclinicalpathwayinacancerhospitalimpactonsepsismanagementoutcomesandcosts
AT haeuslergabriellem implementationofawholeofhospitalsepsisclinicalpathwayinacancerhospitalimpactonsepsismanagementoutcomesandcosts
AT tehbenjamin implementationofawholeofhospitalsepsisclinicalpathwayinacancerhospitalimpactonsepsismanagementoutcomesandcosts
AT tewmichelle implementationofawholeofhospitalsepsisclinicalpathwayinacancerhospitalimpactonsepsismanagementoutcomesandcosts
AT venngeorgina implementationofawholeofhospitalsepsisclinicalpathwayinacancerhospitalimpactonsepsismanagementoutcomesandcosts
AT hiongalison implementationofawholeofhospitalsepsisclinicalpathwayinacancerhospitalimpactonsepsismanagementoutcomesandcosts
AT brownchristine implementationofawholeofhospitalsepsisclinicalpathwayinacancerhospitalimpactonsepsismanagementoutcomesandcosts
AT leungvivian implementationofawholeofhospitalsepsisclinicalpathwayinacancerhospitalimpactonsepsismanagementoutcomesandcosts
AT worthleonj implementationofawholeofhospitalsepsisclinicalpathwayinacancerhospitalimpactonsepsismanagementoutcomesandcosts
AT dalzielkim implementationofawholeofhospitalsepsisclinicalpathwayinacancerhospitalimpactonsepsismanagementoutcomesandcosts
AT slavinmonicaa implementationofawholeofhospitalsepsisclinicalpathwayinacancerhospitalimpactonsepsismanagementoutcomesandcosts