Cargando…

Repeated vital sign measurements in the emergency department predict patient deterioration within 72 hours: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND: More than one in five patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with (suspected) infection or sepsis deteriorate within 72 h from admission. Surprisingly little is known about vital signs in relation to deterioration, especially in the ED. The aim of our study was to determine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quinten, Vincent M., van Meurs, Matijs, Olgers, Tycho J., Vonk, Judith M., Ligtenberg, Jack J. M., ter Maaten, Jan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6045840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30005671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0525-y
_version_ 1783339734748102656
author Quinten, Vincent M.
van Meurs, Matijs
Olgers, Tycho J.
Vonk, Judith M.
Ligtenberg, Jack J. M.
ter Maaten, Jan C.
author_facet Quinten, Vincent M.
van Meurs, Matijs
Olgers, Tycho J.
Vonk, Judith M.
Ligtenberg, Jack J. M.
ter Maaten, Jan C.
author_sort Quinten, Vincent M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: More than one in five patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with (suspected) infection or sepsis deteriorate within 72 h from admission. Surprisingly little is known about vital signs in relation to deterioration, especially in the ED. The aim of our study was to determine whether repeated vital sign measurements in the ED can differentiate between patients who will deteriorate within 72 h and patients who will not deteriorate. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study in patients presenting with (suspected) infection or sepsis to the ED of our tertiary care teaching hospital. Vital signs (heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate and body temperature) were measured in 30-min intervals during the first 3 h in the ED. Primary outcome was patient deterioration within 72 h from admission, defined as the development of acute kidney injury, liver failure, respiratory failure, intensive care unit admission or in-hospital mortality. We performed a logistic regression analysis using a base model including age, gender and comorbidities. Thereafter, we performed separate logistic regression analyses for each vital sign using the value at admission, the change over time and its variability. For each analysis, the odds ratios (OR) and area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: In total 106 (29.5%) of the 359 patients deteriorated within 72 h from admission. Within this timeframe, 18.3% of the patients with infection and 32.9% of the patients with sepsis at ED presentation deteriorated. Associated with deterioration were: age (OR: 1.02), history of diabetes (OR: 1.90), heart rate (OR: 1.01), MAP (OR: 0.96) and respiratory rate (OR: 1.05) at admission, changes over time of MAP (OR: 1.04) and respiratory rate (OR: 1.44) as well as the variability of the MAP (OR: 1.06). Repeated measurements of heart rate and body temperature were not associated with deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated vital sign measurements in the ED are better at identifying patients at risk for deterioration within 72 h from admission than single vital sign measurements at ED admission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6045840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60458402018-07-16 Repeated vital sign measurements in the emergency department predict patient deterioration within 72 hours: a prospective observational study Quinten, Vincent M. van Meurs, Matijs Olgers, Tycho J. Vonk, Judith M. Ligtenberg, Jack J. M. ter Maaten, Jan C. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: More than one in five patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with (suspected) infection or sepsis deteriorate within 72 h from admission. Surprisingly little is known about vital signs in relation to deterioration, especially in the ED. The aim of our study was to determine whether repeated vital sign measurements in the ED can differentiate between patients who will deteriorate within 72 h and patients who will not deteriorate. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study in patients presenting with (suspected) infection or sepsis to the ED of our tertiary care teaching hospital. Vital signs (heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate and body temperature) were measured in 30-min intervals during the first 3 h in the ED. Primary outcome was patient deterioration within 72 h from admission, defined as the development of acute kidney injury, liver failure, respiratory failure, intensive care unit admission or in-hospital mortality. We performed a logistic regression analysis using a base model including age, gender and comorbidities. Thereafter, we performed separate logistic regression analyses for each vital sign using the value at admission, the change over time and its variability. For each analysis, the odds ratios (OR) and area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: In total 106 (29.5%) of the 359 patients deteriorated within 72 h from admission. Within this timeframe, 18.3% of the patients with infection and 32.9% of the patients with sepsis at ED presentation deteriorated. Associated with deterioration were: age (OR: 1.02), history of diabetes (OR: 1.90), heart rate (OR: 1.01), MAP (OR: 0.96) and respiratory rate (OR: 1.05) at admission, changes over time of MAP (OR: 1.04) and respiratory rate (OR: 1.44) as well as the variability of the MAP (OR: 1.06). Repeated measurements of heart rate and body temperature were not associated with deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated vital sign measurements in the ED are better at identifying patients at risk for deterioration within 72 h from admission than single vital sign measurements at ED admission. BioMed Central 2018-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6045840/ /pubmed/30005671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0525-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Quinten, Vincent M.
van Meurs, Matijs
Olgers, Tycho J.
Vonk, Judith M.
Ligtenberg, Jack J. M.
ter Maaten, Jan C.
Repeated vital sign measurements in the emergency department predict patient deterioration within 72 hours: a prospective observational study
title Repeated vital sign measurements in the emergency department predict patient deterioration within 72 hours: a prospective observational study
title_full Repeated vital sign measurements in the emergency department predict patient deterioration within 72 hours: a prospective observational study
title_fullStr Repeated vital sign measurements in the emergency department predict patient deterioration within 72 hours: a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Repeated vital sign measurements in the emergency department predict patient deterioration within 72 hours: a prospective observational study
title_short Repeated vital sign measurements in the emergency department predict patient deterioration within 72 hours: a prospective observational study
title_sort repeated vital sign measurements in the emergency department predict patient deterioration within 72 hours: a prospective observational study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6045840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30005671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0525-y
work_keys_str_mv AT quintenvincentm repeatedvitalsignmeasurementsintheemergencydepartmentpredictpatientdeteriorationwithin72hoursaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT vanmeursmatijs repeatedvitalsignmeasurementsintheemergencydepartmentpredictpatientdeteriorationwithin72hoursaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT olgerstychoj repeatedvitalsignmeasurementsintheemergencydepartmentpredictpatientdeteriorationwithin72hoursaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT vonkjudithm repeatedvitalsignmeasurementsintheemergencydepartmentpredictpatientdeteriorationwithin72hoursaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT ligtenbergjackjm repeatedvitalsignmeasurementsintheemergencydepartmentpredictpatientdeteriorationwithin72hoursaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT termaatenjanc repeatedvitalsignmeasurementsintheemergencydepartmentpredictpatientdeteriorationwithin72hoursaprospectiveobservationalstudy