Cargando…

Cell distribution and cytokine levels in induced sputum from healthy subjects and patients with asthma after using different nebulizer techniques

BACKGROUND: Sputum induction is an important noninvasive method for analyzing bronchial inflammation in patients with asthma and other respiratory diseases. Most frequently, ultrasonic nebulizers are used for sputum induction, but breath-controlled nebulizers may target the small airways more effici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koc-Günel, Sinem, Schubert, Ralf, Zielen, Stefan, Rosewich, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6045886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30005648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0683-8
_version_ 1783339745660633088
author Koc-Günel, Sinem
Schubert, Ralf
Zielen, Stefan
Rosewich, Martin
author_facet Koc-Günel, Sinem
Schubert, Ralf
Zielen, Stefan
Rosewich, Martin
author_sort Koc-Günel, Sinem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sputum induction is an important noninvasive method for analyzing bronchial inflammation in patients with asthma and other respiratory diseases. Most frequently, ultrasonic nebulizers are used for sputum induction, but breath-controlled nebulizers may target the small airways more efficiently. This treatment may produce a cell distribution similar to bronchoalveolar lavage (less neutrophils and more macrophages) and provide deeper insights into the underlying lung pathology. The goal of the study was to compare both types of nebulizer devices and their efficacy in inducing sputum to measure bronchial inflammation, i.e., cell composition and cytokines, in patients with mild allergic asthma and healthy controls. METHODS: The population of this study consisted of 20 healthy control subjects with a median age of 17 years, range: 8–25 years, and 20 patients with a median age of 12 years, range: 8–24 years, presenting with mild, controlled allergic asthma who were not administered an inhaled steroid treatment. We induced sputum in every individual using both devices on two separate days. The sputum weight, the cell composition and cytokine levels were analyzed using a cytometric bead assay (CBA) and by real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR). RESULTS: We did not observe significant differences in the weight, cell distribution or cytokine levels in the sputum samples induced by both devices. In addition, the Bland-Altman correlation revealed good concordance of the cell distribution. As expected, eosinophils and IL-5 levels were significantly elevated in patients with asthma. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that sputum induction with a breath-controlled “smart” nebulizer is more efficient and different from an ultrasonic nebulizer was not confirmed. The Bland-Altman correlations showed good concordance when comparing the two devices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01543516 Retrospective registration date: March 5, 2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6045886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60458862018-07-16 Cell distribution and cytokine levels in induced sputum from healthy subjects and patients with asthma after using different nebulizer techniques Koc-Günel, Sinem Schubert, Ralf Zielen, Stefan Rosewich, Martin BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Sputum induction is an important noninvasive method for analyzing bronchial inflammation in patients with asthma and other respiratory diseases. Most frequently, ultrasonic nebulizers are used for sputum induction, but breath-controlled nebulizers may target the small airways more efficiently. This treatment may produce a cell distribution similar to bronchoalveolar lavage (less neutrophils and more macrophages) and provide deeper insights into the underlying lung pathology. The goal of the study was to compare both types of nebulizer devices and their efficacy in inducing sputum to measure bronchial inflammation, i.e., cell composition and cytokines, in patients with mild allergic asthma and healthy controls. METHODS: The population of this study consisted of 20 healthy control subjects with a median age of 17 years, range: 8–25 years, and 20 patients with a median age of 12 years, range: 8–24 years, presenting with mild, controlled allergic asthma who were not administered an inhaled steroid treatment. We induced sputum in every individual using both devices on two separate days. The sputum weight, the cell composition and cytokine levels were analyzed using a cytometric bead assay (CBA) and by real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR). RESULTS: We did not observe significant differences in the weight, cell distribution or cytokine levels in the sputum samples induced by both devices. In addition, the Bland-Altman correlation revealed good concordance of the cell distribution. As expected, eosinophils and IL-5 levels were significantly elevated in patients with asthma. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis that sputum induction with a breath-controlled “smart” nebulizer is more efficient and different from an ultrasonic nebulizer was not confirmed. The Bland-Altman correlations showed good concordance when comparing the two devices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01543516 Retrospective registration date: March 5, 2012. BioMed Central 2018-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6045886/ /pubmed/30005648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0683-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Koc-Günel, Sinem
Schubert, Ralf
Zielen, Stefan
Rosewich, Martin
Cell distribution and cytokine levels in induced sputum from healthy subjects and patients with asthma after using different nebulizer techniques
title Cell distribution and cytokine levels in induced sputum from healthy subjects and patients with asthma after using different nebulizer techniques
title_full Cell distribution and cytokine levels in induced sputum from healthy subjects and patients with asthma after using different nebulizer techniques
title_fullStr Cell distribution and cytokine levels in induced sputum from healthy subjects and patients with asthma after using different nebulizer techniques
title_full_unstemmed Cell distribution and cytokine levels in induced sputum from healthy subjects and patients with asthma after using different nebulizer techniques
title_short Cell distribution and cytokine levels in induced sputum from healthy subjects and patients with asthma after using different nebulizer techniques
title_sort cell distribution and cytokine levels in induced sputum from healthy subjects and patients with asthma after using different nebulizer techniques
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6045886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30005648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0683-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kocgunelsinem celldistributionandcytokinelevelsininducedsputumfromhealthysubjectsandpatientswithasthmaafterusingdifferentnebulizertechniques
AT schubertralf celldistributionandcytokinelevelsininducedsputumfromhealthysubjectsandpatientswithasthmaafterusingdifferentnebulizertechniques
AT zielenstefan celldistributionandcytokinelevelsininducedsputumfromhealthysubjectsandpatientswithasthmaafterusingdifferentnebulizertechniques
AT rosewichmartin celldistributionandcytokinelevelsininducedsputumfromhealthysubjectsandpatientswithasthmaafterusingdifferentnebulizertechniques