Cargando…

Morphologically poor blastocysts could affect the implantation rate of a morphologically good blastocyst during a double‐blastocyst transfer for patients who have experienced repeated implantation failures

PURPOSE: Increasing the number of transferred blastocysts sometimes is selected for patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF). To confirm this strategy, the pregnancy rates (PRs) were compared among the groups who had transferred either a single morphologically good blastocyst (MGB group), d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohgi, Shirei, Taga, Yukino, Anakubo, Hisayo, Kurata, Yuki, Hatakeyama, Shota, Yanaihara, Atsushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6046531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30013425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12097
_version_ 1783339830832267264
author Ohgi, Shirei
Taga, Yukino
Anakubo, Hisayo
Kurata, Yuki
Hatakeyama, Shota
Yanaihara, Atsushi
author_facet Ohgi, Shirei
Taga, Yukino
Anakubo, Hisayo
Kurata, Yuki
Hatakeyama, Shota
Yanaihara, Atsushi
author_sort Ohgi, Shirei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Increasing the number of transferred blastocysts sometimes is selected for patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF). To confirm this strategy, the pregnancy rates (PRs) were compared among the groups who had transferred either a single morphologically good blastocyst (MGB group), double blastocysts with both a MGB and a morphologically poor blastocyst (MGB + MPB group), or a double‐BT with 2 MGBs (two‐MGB group). METHODS: This study was performed between April, 2009 and September, 2014, including 634 cycles for 354 patients with RIF. All the patients received cryopreserved blastocysts in either hormone replacement or natural ovulatory cycles. The included MGBs were at more than the Gardner grade 3BB stage. The PR and implantation rates (IRs) among the three groups were statistically evaluated by the chi‐square test. Statistical significance was set at P < .01. RESULTS: Although the PRs were similar in these three groups, the IR in the MGB + MPB group was significantly lower than that of the MGB group. The rate in the two‐MGB group also was significantly lower than that of the MGB group. CONCLUSION: A double‐BT with a MGB and a MPB does not increase the pregnancy rate, compared with a single‐BT with a MGB among patients with RIF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6046531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60465312018-07-16 Morphologically poor blastocysts could affect the implantation rate of a morphologically good blastocyst during a double‐blastocyst transfer for patients who have experienced repeated implantation failures Ohgi, Shirei Taga, Yukino Anakubo, Hisayo Kurata, Yuki Hatakeyama, Shota Yanaihara, Atsushi Reprod Med Biol Original Articles PURPOSE: Increasing the number of transferred blastocysts sometimes is selected for patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF). To confirm this strategy, the pregnancy rates (PRs) were compared among the groups who had transferred either a single morphologically good blastocyst (MGB group), double blastocysts with both a MGB and a morphologically poor blastocyst (MGB + MPB group), or a double‐BT with 2 MGBs (two‐MGB group). METHODS: This study was performed between April, 2009 and September, 2014, including 634 cycles for 354 patients with RIF. All the patients received cryopreserved blastocysts in either hormone replacement or natural ovulatory cycles. The included MGBs were at more than the Gardner grade 3BB stage. The PR and implantation rates (IRs) among the three groups were statistically evaluated by the chi‐square test. Statistical significance was set at P < .01. RESULTS: Although the PRs were similar in these three groups, the IR in the MGB + MPB group was significantly lower than that of the MGB group. The rate in the two‐MGB group also was significantly lower than that of the MGB group. CONCLUSION: A double‐BT with a MGB and a MPB does not increase the pregnancy rate, compared with a single‐BT with a MGB among patients with RIF. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6046531/ /pubmed/30013425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12097 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ohgi, Shirei
Taga, Yukino
Anakubo, Hisayo
Kurata, Yuki
Hatakeyama, Shota
Yanaihara, Atsushi
Morphologically poor blastocysts could affect the implantation rate of a morphologically good blastocyst during a double‐blastocyst transfer for patients who have experienced repeated implantation failures
title Morphologically poor blastocysts could affect the implantation rate of a morphologically good blastocyst during a double‐blastocyst transfer for patients who have experienced repeated implantation failures
title_full Morphologically poor blastocysts could affect the implantation rate of a morphologically good blastocyst during a double‐blastocyst transfer for patients who have experienced repeated implantation failures
title_fullStr Morphologically poor blastocysts could affect the implantation rate of a morphologically good blastocyst during a double‐blastocyst transfer for patients who have experienced repeated implantation failures
title_full_unstemmed Morphologically poor blastocysts could affect the implantation rate of a morphologically good blastocyst during a double‐blastocyst transfer for patients who have experienced repeated implantation failures
title_short Morphologically poor blastocysts could affect the implantation rate of a morphologically good blastocyst during a double‐blastocyst transfer for patients who have experienced repeated implantation failures
title_sort morphologically poor blastocysts could affect the implantation rate of a morphologically good blastocyst during a double‐blastocyst transfer for patients who have experienced repeated implantation failures
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6046531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30013425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12097
work_keys_str_mv AT ohgishirei morphologicallypoorblastocystscouldaffecttheimplantationrateofamorphologicallygoodblastocystduringadoubleblastocysttransferforpatientswhohaveexperiencedrepeatedimplantationfailures
AT tagayukino morphologicallypoorblastocystscouldaffecttheimplantationrateofamorphologicallygoodblastocystduringadoubleblastocysttransferforpatientswhohaveexperiencedrepeatedimplantationfailures
AT anakubohisayo morphologicallypoorblastocystscouldaffecttheimplantationrateofamorphologicallygoodblastocystduringadoubleblastocysttransferforpatientswhohaveexperiencedrepeatedimplantationfailures
AT kuratayuki morphologicallypoorblastocystscouldaffecttheimplantationrateofamorphologicallygoodblastocystduringadoubleblastocysttransferforpatientswhohaveexperiencedrepeatedimplantationfailures
AT hatakeyamashota morphologicallypoorblastocystscouldaffecttheimplantationrateofamorphologicallygoodblastocystduringadoubleblastocysttransferforpatientswhohaveexperiencedrepeatedimplantationfailures
AT yanaiharaatsushi morphologicallypoorblastocystscouldaffecttheimplantationrateofamorphologicallygoodblastocystduringadoubleblastocysttransferforpatientswhohaveexperiencedrepeatedimplantationfailures