Cargando…
Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care
BACKGROUND: Emergence of population pharmacokinetic models for prediction of individual pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles facilitates individualization of prescribed prophylactic therapy for patients with hemophilia A and B and may have a favorable impact on clinical outcomes and annual factor utilizati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6046597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30046766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12118 |
_version_ | 1783339846235848704 |
---|---|
author | Croteau, Stacy E. Callaghan, Michael U. Davis, Joanna Dunn, Amy L. Guerrera, Michael Khan, Osman Neufeld, Ellis J. Raffini, Leslie J. Recht, Michael Wang, Michael Iorio, Alfonso |
author_facet | Croteau, Stacy E. Callaghan, Michael U. Davis, Joanna Dunn, Amy L. Guerrera, Michael Khan, Osman Neufeld, Ellis J. Raffini, Leslie J. Recht, Michael Wang, Michael Iorio, Alfonso |
author_sort | Croteau, Stacy E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Emergence of population pharmacokinetic models for prediction of individual pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles facilitates individualization of prescribed prophylactic therapy for patients with hemophilia A and B and may have a favorable impact on clinical outcomes and annual factor utilization. How providers approach the integration and application of these data into routine clinical practice is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To explore the potential application of and barriers to incorporating PK profiles into current hemophilia prophylaxis decision making. METHODS: A facilitated group discussion of hematologists practicing within the federally‐supported United States Hemophilia Treatment Center Network was conducted. Separately, a group of parents of patients with severe hemophilia less than 18 years of age participated in a focus group on individualizing prophylactic factor regimens with the use of PK data. RESULTS: Physician participants constructed a conceptual model for factors that determined their selection of hemophilia prophylaxis. These factors clustered in five groupings. When charged with creating a prophylaxis regimen for a specific clinical case including PK data, eight of nine providers generated a unique regimen. Parent focus group supported PK data use as they preferred data driven treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Clinician application of PK data for prophylaxis decision making is heterogeneous. Prospective evaluation of the use of PK‐tailored prophylaxis in routine care and its impact on patient outcomes is needed. Parents perceived that, while obtaining blood draws could be challenging, images of factor activity decay informed their decisions about physical activity timing and provided an opportunity for partnership and shared decision making with their provider. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6046597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60465972018-07-25 Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care Croteau, Stacy E. Callaghan, Michael U. Davis, Joanna Dunn, Amy L. Guerrera, Michael Khan, Osman Neufeld, Ellis J. Raffini, Leslie J. Recht, Michael Wang, Michael Iorio, Alfonso Res Pract Thromb Haemost Online‐only Articles BACKGROUND: Emergence of population pharmacokinetic models for prediction of individual pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles facilitates individualization of prescribed prophylactic therapy for patients with hemophilia A and B and may have a favorable impact on clinical outcomes and annual factor utilization. How providers approach the integration and application of these data into routine clinical practice is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To explore the potential application of and barriers to incorporating PK profiles into current hemophilia prophylaxis decision making. METHODS: A facilitated group discussion of hematologists practicing within the federally‐supported United States Hemophilia Treatment Center Network was conducted. Separately, a group of parents of patients with severe hemophilia less than 18 years of age participated in a focus group on individualizing prophylactic factor regimens with the use of PK data. RESULTS: Physician participants constructed a conceptual model for factors that determined their selection of hemophilia prophylaxis. These factors clustered in five groupings. When charged with creating a prophylaxis regimen for a specific clinical case including PK data, eight of nine providers generated a unique regimen. Parent focus group supported PK data use as they preferred data driven treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Clinician application of PK data for prophylaxis decision making is heterogeneous. Prospective evaluation of the use of PK‐tailored prophylaxis in routine care and its impact on patient outcomes is needed. Parents perceived that, while obtaining blood draws could be challenging, images of factor activity decay informed their decisions about physical activity timing and provided an opportunity for partnership and shared decision making with their provider. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6046597/ /pubmed/30046766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12118 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Online‐only Articles Croteau, Stacy E. Callaghan, Michael U. Davis, Joanna Dunn, Amy L. Guerrera, Michael Khan, Osman Neufeld, Ellis J. Raffini, Leslie J. Recht, Michael Wang, Michael Iorio, Alfonso Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care |
title | Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care |
title_full | Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care |
title_fullStr | Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care |
title_full_unstemmed | Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care |
title_short | Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care |
title_sort | focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care |
topic | Online‐only Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6046597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30046766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT croteaustacye focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare AT callaghanmichaelu focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare AT davisjoanna focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare AT dunnamyl focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare AT guerreramichael focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare AT khanosman focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare AT neufeldellisj focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare AT raffinilesliej focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare AT rechtmichael focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare AT wangmichael focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare AT iorioalfonso focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare |