Cargando…

Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care

BACKGROUND: Emergence of population pharmacokinetic models for prediction of individual pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles facilitates individualization of prescribed prophylactic therapy for patients with hemophilia A and B and may have a favorable impact on clinical outcomes and annual factor utilizati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Croteau, Stacy E., Callaghan, Michael U., Davis, Joanna, Dunn, Amy L., Guerrera, Michael, Khan, Osman, Neufeld, Ellis J., Raffini, Leslie J., Recht, Michael, Wang, Michael, Iorio, Alfonso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6046597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30046766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12118
_version_ 1783339846235848704
author Croteau, Stacy E.
Callaghan, Michael U.
Davis, Joanna
Dunn, Amy L.
Guerrera, Michael
Khan, Osman
Neufeld, Ellis J.
Raffini, Leslie J.
Recht, Michael
Wang, Michael
Iorio, Alfonso
author_facet Croteau, Stacy E.
Callaghan, Michael U.
Davis, Joanna
Dunn, Amy L.
Guerrera, Michael
Khan, Osman
Neufeld, Ellis J.
Raffini, Leslie J.
Recht, Michael
Wang, Michael
Iorio, Alfonso
author_sort Croteau, Stacy E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergence of population pharmacokinetic models for prediction of individual pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles facilitates individualization of prescribed prophylactic therapy for patients with hemophilia A and B and may have a favorable impact on clinical outcomes and annual factor utilization. How providers approach the integration and application of these data into routine clinical practice is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To explore the potential application of and barriers to incorporating PK profiles into current hemophilia prophylaxis decision making. METHODS: A facilitated group discussion of hematologists practicing within the federally‐supported United States Hemophilia Treatment Center Network was conducted. Separately, a group of parents of patients with severe hemophilia less than 18 years of age participated in a focus group on individualizing prophylactic factor regimens with the use of PK data. RESULTS: Physician participants constructed a conceptual model for factors that determined their selection of hemophilia prophylaxis. These factors clustered in five groupings. When charged with creating a prophylaxis regimen for a specific clinical case including PK data, eight of nine providers generated a unique regimen. Parent focus group supported PK data use as they preferred data driven treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Clinician application of PK data for prophylaxis decision making is heterogeneous. Prospective evaluation of the use of PK‐tailored prophylaxis in routine care and its impact on patient outcomes is needed. Parents perceived that, while obtaining blood draws could be challenging, images of factor activity decay informed their decisions about physical activity timing and provided an opportunity for partnership and shared decision making with their provider.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6046597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60465972018-07-25 Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care Croteau, Stacy E. Callaghan, Michael U. Davis, Joanna Dunn, Amy L. Guerrera, Michael Khan, Osman Neufeld, Ellis J. Raffini, Leslie J. Recht, Michael Wang, Michael Iorio, Alfonso Res Pract Thromb Haemost Online‐only Articles BACKGROUND: Emergence of population pharmacokinetic models for prediction of individual pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles facilitates individualization of prescribed prophylactic therapy for patients with hemophilia A and B and may have a favorable impact on clinical outcomes and annual factor utilization. How providers approach the integration and application of these data into routine clinical practice is not clear. OBJECTIVE: To explore the potential application of and barriers to incorporating PK profiles into current hemophilia prophylaxis decision making. METHODS: A facilitated group discussion of hematologists practicing within the federally‐supported United States Hemophilia Treatment Center Network was conducted. Separately, a group of parents of patients with severe hemophilia less than 18 years of age participated in a focus group on individualizing prophylactic factor regimens with the use of PK data. RESULTS: Physician participants constructed a conceptual model for factors that determined their selection of hemophilia prophylaxis. These factors clustered in five groupings. When charged with creating a prophylaxis regimen for a specific clinical case including PK data, eight of nine providers generated a unique regimen. Parent focus group supported PK data use as they preferred data driven treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Clinician application of PK data for prophylaxis decision making is heterogeneous. Prospective evaluation of the use of PK‐tailored prophylaxis in routine care and its impact on patient outcomes is needed. Parents perceived that, while obtaining blood draws could be challenging, images of factor activity decay informed their decisions about physical activity timing and provided an opportunity for partnership and shared decision making with their provider. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6046597/ /pubmed/30046766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12118 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Online‐only Articles
Croteau, Stacy E.
Callaghan, Michael U.
Davis, Joanna
Dunn, Amy L.
Guerrera, Michael
Khan, Osman
Neufeld, Ellis J.
Raffini, Leslie J.
Recht, Michael
Wang, Michael
Iorio, Alfonso
Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care
title Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care
title_full Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care
title_fullStr Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care
title_full_unstemmed Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care
title_short Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care
title_sort focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care
topic Online‐only Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6046597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30046766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12118
work_keys_str_mv AT croteaustacye focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare
AT callaghanmichaelu focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare
AT davisjoanna focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare
AT dunnamyl focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare
AT guerreramichael focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare
AT khanosman focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare
AT neufeldellisj focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare
AT raffinilesliej focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare
AT rechtmichael focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare
AT wangmichael focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare
AT iorioalfonso focusinginonuseofpharmacokineticprofilesinroutinehemophiliacare