Cargando…
Evaluation of newborn sickle cell screening programme in England: 2010–2016
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate England’s NHS newborn sickle cell screening programme performance in children up to the age of 5 years. DESIGN: Cohort of resident infants with sickle cell disease (SCD) born between 1 September 2010 and 31 August 2015 and followed until August 2016. PARTICIPANTS: 1317 infants...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6047151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313213 |
_version_ | 1783339908491902976 |
---|---|
author | Streetly, Allison Sisodia, Rupa Dick, Moira Latinovic, Radoslav Hounsell, Kirsty Dormandy, Elizabeth |
author_facet | Streetly, Allison Sisodia, Rupa Dick, Moira Latinovic, Radoslav Hounsell, Kirsty Dormandy, Elizabeth |
author_sort | Streetly, Allison |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate England’s NHS newborn sickle cell screening programme performance in children up to the age of 5 years. DESIGN: Cohort of resident infants with sickle cell disease (SCD) born between 1 September 2010 and 31 August 2015 and followed until August 2016. PARTICIPANTS: 1317 infants with SCD were notified to the study from all centres in England and 1313 (99%) were followed up. INTERVENTIONS: Early enrolment in clinical follow-up, parental education and routine penicillin prophylaxis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age seen by a specialist clinician, age at prescription of penicillin prophylaxis and mortality. RESULTS: All but two resident cases of SCD were identified through screening; one baby was enrolled in care after prenatal diagnosis; one baby whose parents refused newborn screening presented symptomatically. There were 1054/1313 (80.3%, 95% CI 78% to 82.4%) SCD cases seen by a specialist by 3 months of age and 1273/1313 (97%, 95% CI 95.9% to 97.8%) by 6 months. The percentage seen by 3 months increased from 77% in 2010 to 85.4% in 2015. 1038/1292 (80.3%, 95% CI 78.1% to 82.5%) were prescribed penicillin by 3 months of age and 1257/1292 (97.3%, 95% CI 96.3% to 98.1%) by 6 months. There were three SCD deaths <5 years caused by invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) sensitive to penicillin. CONCLUSION: The SCD screening programme is effective at detecting affected infants. Enrolment into specialist care is timely but below the programme standards. Mortality is reducing but adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis remains important for IPD serotypes not in the current vaccine schedule. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6047151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60471512018-07-18 Evaluation of newborn sickle cell screening programme in England: 2010–2016 Streetly, Allison Sisodia, Rupa Dick, Moira Latinovic, Radoslav Hounsell, Kirsty Dormandy, Elizabeth Arch Dis Child Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate England’s NHS newborn sickle cell screening programme performance in children up to the age of 5 years. DESIGN: Cohort of resident infants with sickle cell disease (SCD) born between 1 September 2010 and 31 August 2015 and followed until August 2016. PARTICIPANTS: 1317 infants with SCD were notified to the study from all centres in England and 1313 (99%) were followed up. INTERVENTIONS: Early enrolment in clinical follow-up, parental education and routine penicillin prophylaxis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age seen by a specialist clinician, age at prescription of penicillin prophylaxis and mortality. RESULTS: All but two resident cases of SCD were identified through screening; one baby was enrolled in care after prenatal diagnosis; one baby whose parents refused newborn screening presented symptomatically. There were 1054/1313 (80.3%, 95% CI 78% to 82.4%) SCD cases seen by a specialist by 3 months of age and 1273/1313 (97%, 95% CI 95.9% to 97.8%) by 6 months. The percentage seen by 3 months increased from 77% in 2010 to 85.4% in 2015. 1038/1292 (80.3%, 95% CI 78.1% to 82.5%) were prescribed penicillin by 3 months of age and 1257/1292 (97.3%, 95% CI 96.3% to 98.1%) by 6 months. There were three SCD deaths <5 years caused by invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) sensitive to penicillin. CONCLUSION: The SCD screening programme is effective at detecting affected infants. Enrolment into specialist care is timely but below the programme standards. Mortality is reducing but adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis remains important for IPD serotypes not in the current vaccine schedule. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-07 2017-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6047151/ /pubmed/29104181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313213 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Streetly, Allison Sisodia, Rupa Dick, Moira Latinovic, Radoslav Hounsell, Kirsty Dormandy, Elizabeth Evaluation of newborn sickle cell screening programme in England: 2010–2016 |
title | Evaluation of newborn sickle cell screening programme in England: 2010–2016 |
title_full | Evaluation of newborn sickle cell screening programme in England: 2010–2016 |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of newborn sickle cell screening programme in England: 2010–2016 |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of newborn sickle cell screening programme in England: 2010–2016 |
title_short | Evaluation of newborn sickle cell screening programme in England: 2010–2016 |
title_sort | evaluation of newborn sickle cell screening programme in england: 2010–2016 |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6047151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29104181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313213 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT streetlyallison evaluationofnewbornsicklecellscreeningprogrammeinengland20102016 AT sisodiarupa evaluationofnewbornsicklecellscreeningprogrammeinengland20102016 AT dickmoira evaluationofnewbornsicklecellscreeningprogrammeinengland20102016 AT latinovicradoslav evaluationofnewbornsicklecellscreeningprogrammeinengland20102016 AT hounsellkirsty evaluationofnewbornsicklecellscreeningprogrammeinengland20102016 AT dormandyelizabeth evaluationofnewbornsicklecellscreeningprogrammeinengland20102016 |