Cargando…

Evaluation of Montelukast for the Treatment of Children With Japanese Cedar Pollinosis Using an Artificial Exposure Chamber (OHIO Chamber)

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy of montelukast in reducing seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms in Japanese children with Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis induced in an artificial exposure chamber (OHIO Chamber). METHODS: Pediatric patients aged 10 to 15 years sensitive to JC pollen enter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hashiguchi, Kazuhiro, Okubo, Kimihiro, Inoue, Yoichi, Numaguchi, Hirotaka, Tanaka, Kumi, Oshima, Nobuyuki, Mehta, Anish, Nishida, Chisato, Saito, Itori, Philip, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6047236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30027002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2152656718783599
_version_ 1783339919150678016
author Hashiguchi, Kazuhiro
Okubo, Kimihiro
Inoue, Yoichi
Numaguchi, Hirotaka
Tanaka, Kumi
Oshima, Nobuyuki
Mehta, Anish
Nishida, Chisato
Saito, Itori
Philip, George
author_facet Hashiguchi, Kazuhiro
Okubo, Kimihiro
Inoue, Yoichi
Numaguchi, Hirotaka
Tanaka, Kumi
Oshima, Nobuyuki
Mehta, Anish
Nishida, Chisato
Saito, Itori
Philip, George
author_sort Hashiguchi, Kazuhiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy of montelukast in reducing seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms in Japanese children with Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis induced in an artificial exposure chamber (OHIO Chamber). METHODS: Pediatric patients aged 10 to 15 years sensitive to JC pollen entered a randomized, double-blind, single-site, crossover study. After confirmation of an allergic response to a JC pollen exposure for 3 hours in the OHIO Chamber during the screening period, subjects received either montelukast 5 mg chewable tablets or placebo for a 7-day treatment period, followed by a 3-hour pollen exposure in the chamber. After a 7-day washout period, subjects crossed over to the other treatment. Subjects were instructed to self-assess their nasal symptoms using 5-point scale for every 30 minutes. The primary end point was the change from baseline (just before entering the exposure chamber for each exposure) in total nasal symptom score (TNSS; the sum of nasal congestion, nasal discharge, and sneezing scores) over 3 hours of pollen exposure. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study. RESULTS: A total of 220 subjects (median age, 12 years) received treatment. For TNSS, the between-group difference in the change (95% confidence interval) was −0.01 (−0.11 to 0.10); the change between placebo and montelukast 5 mg was not significant. TNSS in the screening and treatment periods after receiving placebo for 7 days was 1.58 and 1.31, respectively, suggesting a placebo response. On account of high placebo response, a post hoc analysis was conducted. The analysis in a subgroup of subjects who did not show placebo response demonstrated a difference in the efficacy between montelukast and placebo (nominal P < .037). The most common AE was positive urine protein (4.6% with montelukast vs 7.8% with placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Although montelukast was well tolerated, this study did not demonstrate a treatment difference between active drug and placebo in Japanese children exposed to JC pollen in the OHIO Chamber. Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01852812
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6047236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60472362018-07-19 Evaluation of Montelukast for the Treatment of Children With Japanese Cedar Pollinosis Using an Artificial Exposure Chamber (OHIO Chamber) Hashiguchi, Kazuhiro Okubo, Kimihiro Inoue, Yoichi Numaguchi, Hirotaka Tanaka, Kumi Oshima, Nobuyuki Mehta, Anish Nishida, Chisato Saito, Itori Philip, George Allergy Rhinol (Providence) Article BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy of montelukast in reducing seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms in Japanese children with Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis induced in an artificial exposure chamber (OHIO Chamber). METHODS: Pediatric patients aged 10 to 15 years sensitive to JC pollen entered a randomized, double-blind, single-site, crossover study. After confirmation of an allergic response to a JC pollen exposure for 3 hours in the OHIO Chamber during the screening period, subjects received either montelukast 5 mg chewable tablets or placebo for a 7-day treatment period, followed by a 3-hour pollen exposure in the chamber. After a 7-day washout period, subjects crossed over to the other treatment. Subjects were instructed to self-assess their nasal symptoms using 5-point scale for every 30 minutes. The primary end point was the change from baseline (just before entering the exposure chamber for each exposure) in total nasal symptom score (TNSS; the sum of nasal congestion, nasal discharge, and sneezing scores) over 3 hours of pollen exposure. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study. RESULTS: A total of 220 subjects (median age, 12 years) received treatment. For TNSS, the between-group difference in the change (95% confidence interval) was −0.01 (−0.11 to 0.10); the change between placebo and montelukast 5 mg was not significant. TNSS in the screening and treatment periods after receiving placebo for 7 days was 1.58 and 1.31, respectively, suggesting a placebo response. On account of high placebo response, a post hoc analysis was conducted. The analysis in a subgroup of subjects who did not show placebo response demonstrated a difference in the efficacy between montelukast and placebo (nominal P < .037). The most common AE was positive urine protein (4.6% with montelukast vs 7.8% with placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Although montelukast was well tolerated, this study did not demonstrate a treatment difference between active drug and placebo in Japanese children exposed to JC pollen in the OHIO Chamber. Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01852812 SAGE Publications 2018-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6047236/ /pubmed/30027002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2152656718783599 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Hashiguchi, Kazuhiro
Okubo, Kimihiro
Inoue, Yoichi
Numaguchi, Hirotaka
Tanaka, Kumi
Oshima, Nobuyuki
Mehta, Anish
Nishida, Chisato
Saito, Itori
Philip, George
Evaluation of Montelukast for the Treatment of Children With Japanese Cedar Pollinosis Using an Artificial Exposure Chamber (OHIO Chamber)
title Evaluation of Montelukast for the Treatment of Children With Japanese Cedar Pollinosis Using an Artificial Exposure Chamber (OHIO Chamber)
title_full Evaluation of Montelukast for the Treatment of Children With Japanese Cedar Pollinosis Using an Artificial Exposure Chamber (OHIO Chamber)
title_fullStr Evaluation of Montelukast for the Treatment of Children With Japanese Cedar Pollinosis Using an Artificial Exposure Chamber (OHIO Chamber)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Montelukast for the Treatment of Children With Japanese Cedar Pollinosis Using an Artificial Exposure Chamber (OHIO Chamber)
title_short Evaluation of Montelukast for the Treatment of Children With Japanese Cedar Pollinosis Using an Artificial Exposure Chamber (OHIO Chamber)
title_sort evaluation of montelukast for the treatment of children with japanese cedar pollinosis using an artificial exposure chamber (ohio chamber)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6047236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30027002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2152656718783599
work_keys_str_mv AT hashiguchikazuhiro evaluationofmontelukastforthetreatmentofchildrenwithjapanesecedarpollinosisusinganartificialexposurechamberohiochamber
AT okubokimihiro evaluationofmontelukastforthetreatmentofchildrenwithjapanesecedarpollinosisusinganartificialexposurechamberohiochamber
AT inoueyoichi evaluationofmontelukastforthetreatmentofchildrenwithjapanesecedarpollinosisusinganartificialexposurechamberohiochamber
AT numaguchihirotaka evaluationofmontelukastforthetreatmentofchildrenwithjapanesecedarpollinosisusinganartificialexposurechamberohiochamber
AT tanakakumi evaluationofmontelukastforthetreatmentofchildrenwithjapanesecedarpollinosisusinganartificialexposurechamberohiochamber
AT oshimanobuyuki evaluationofmontelukastforthetreatmentofchildrenwithjapanesecedarpollinosisusinganartificialexposurechamberohiochamber
AT mehtaanish evaluationofmontelukastforthetreatmentofchildrenwithjapanesecedarpollinosisusinganartificialexposurechamberohiochamber
AT nishidachisato evaluationofmontelukastforthetreatmentofchildrenwithjapanesecedarpollinosisusinganartificialexposurechamberohiochamber
AT saitoitori evaluationofmontelukastforthetreatmentofchildrenwithjapanesecedarpollinosisusinganartificialexposurechamberohiochamber
AT philipgeorge evaluationofmontelukastforthetreatmentofchildrenwithjapanesecedarpollinosisusinganartificialexposurechamberohiochamber