Cargando…

Comparison of the prognostic impact and combination of preoperative inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers in patients with stage II gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the prognostic value of preoperative established inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers, C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toyokawa, Takahiro, Muguruma, Kazuya, Tamura, Tatsuro, Sakurai, Katsunobu, Amano, Ryosuke, Kubo, Naoshi, Tanaka, Hiroaki, Yashiro, Masakazu, Hirakawa, Kosei, Ohira, Masaichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6047670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034622
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.25486
_version_ 1783339979786682368
author Toyokawa, Takahiro
Muguruma, Kazuya
Tamura, Tatsuro
Sakurai, Katsunobu
Amano, Ryosuke
Kubo, Naoshi
Tanaka, Hiroaki
Yashiro, Masakazu
Hirakawa, Kosei
Ohira, Masaichi
author_facet Toyokawa, Takahiro
Muguruma, Kazuya
Tamura, Tatsuro
Sakurai, Katsunobu
Amano, Ryosuke
Kubo, Naoshi
Tanaka, Hiroaki
Yashiro, Masakazu
Hirakawa, Kosei
Ohira, Masaichi
author_sort Toyokawa, Takahiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the prognostic value of preoperative established inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers, C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Glasgow Prognostic Score, and prognostic index in patients with stage II gastric cancer. We then developed a new prognostic index based on the results of our investigation. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 240 consecutive patients who underwent R0 resection for stage II gastric cancer. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to assess discrimination ability and to determine optimal cut-off values. Prognostic factors predicting overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers, multivariate analyses demonstrated CAR and PNI as independent prognostic factors for OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.707, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.016-2.867, p=0.044 and HR 0.415, 95%CI 0.234-0.736, p=0.003, respectively). CAR-PNI score, constructed as the combination of CAR and PNI, was significantly associated with OS, relapse-free survival and cancer-specific survival (p<0.001 each). Multivariate analysis revealed CAR-PNI score as an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR for CAR-PNI score 1: 2.432, 95%CI 1.155-5.118; HR for CAR-PNI score 2: 4.099, 95%CI 1.835-9.157; p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: CAR and PNI are independent prognostic factors providing superior prediction of survival compared to other inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers. CAR-PNI score offers a novel and promising prognostic indicator for patients with stage II gastric cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6047670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60476702018-07-20 Comparison of the prognostic impact and combination of preoperative inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers in patients with stage II gastric cancer Toyokawa, Takahiro Muguruma, Kazuya Tamura, Tatsuro Sakurai, Katsunobu Amano, Ryosuke Kubo, Naoshi Tanaka, Hiroaki Yashiro, Masakazu Hirakawa, Kosei Ohira, Masaichi Oncotarget Research Paper BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the prognostic value of preoperative established inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers, C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Glasgow Prognostic Score, and prognostic index in patients with stage II gastric cancer. We then developed a new prognostic index based on the results of our investigation. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 240 consecutive patients who underwent R0 resection for stage II gastric cancer. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed to assess discrimination ability and to determine optimal cut-off values. Prognostic factors predicting overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers, multivariate analyses demonstrated CAR and PNI as independent prognostic factors for OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.707, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.016-2.867, p=0.044 and HR 0.415, 95%CI 0.234-0.736, p=0.003, respectively). CAR-PNI score, constructed as the combination of CAR and PNI, was significantly associated with OS, relapse-free survival and cancer-specific survival (p<0.001 each). Multivariate analysis revealed CAR-PNI score as an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR for CAR-PNI score 1: 2.432, 95%CI 1.155-5.118; HR for CAR-PNI score 2: 4.099, 95%CI 1.835-9.157; p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: CAR and PNI are independent prognostic factors providing superior prediction of survival compared to other inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers. CAR-PNI score offers a novel and promising prognostic indicator for patients with stage II gastric cancer. Impact Journals LLC 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6047670/ /pubmed/30034622 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.25486 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Toyokawa et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Toyokawa, Takahiro
Muguruma, Kazuya
Tamura, Tatsuro
Sakurai, Katsunobu
Amano, Ryosuke
Kubo, Naoshi
Tanaka, Hiroaki
Yashiro, Masakazu
Hirakawa, Kosei
Ohira, Masaichi
Comparison of the prognostic impact and combination of preoperative inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers in patients with stage II gastric cancer
title Comparison of the prognostic impact and combination of preoperative inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers in patients with stage II gastric cancer
title_full Comparison of the prognostic impact and combination of preoperative inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers in patients with stage II gastric cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of the prognostic impact and combination of preoperative inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers in patients with stage II gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the prognostic impact and combination of preoperative inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers in patients with stage II gastric cancer
title_short Comparison of the prognostic impact and combination of preoperative inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers in patients with stage II gastric cancer
title_sort comparison of the prognostic impact and combination of preoperative inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers in patients with stage ii gastric cancer
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6047670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034622
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.25486
work_keys_str_mv AT toyokawatakahiro comparisonoftheprognosticimpactandcombinationofpreoperativeinflammationbasedandornutritionalmarkersinpatientswithstageiigastriccancer
AT mugurumakazuya comparisonoftheprognosticimpactandcombinationofpreoperativeinflammationbasedandornutritionalmarkersinpatientswithstageiigastriccancer
AT tamuratatsuro comparisonoftheprognosticimpactandcombinationofpreoperativeinflammationbasedandornutritionalmarkersinpatientswithstageiigastriccancer
AT sakuraikatsunobu comparisonoftheprognosticimpactandcombinationofpreoperativeinflammationbasedandornutritionalmarkersinpatientswithstageiigastriccancer
AT amanoryosuke comparisonoftheprognosticimpactandcombinationofpreoperativeinflammationbasedandornutritionalmarkersinpatientswithstageiigastriccancer
AT kubonaoshi comparisonoftheprognosticimpactandcombinationofpreoperativeinflammationbasedandornutritionalmarkersinpatientswithstageiigastriccancer
AT tanakahiroaki comparisonoftheprognosticimpactandcombinationofpreoperativeinflammationbasedandornutritionalmarkersinpatientswithstageiigastriccancer
AT yashiromasakazu comparisonoftheprognosticimpactandcombinationofpreoperativeinflammationbasedandornutritionalmarkersinpatientswithstageiigastriccancer
AT hirakawakosei comparisonoftheprognosticimpactandcombinationofpreoperativeinflammationbasedandornutritionalmarkersinpatientswithstageiigastriccancer
AT ohiramasaichi comparisonoftheprognosticimpactandcombinationofpreoperativeinflammationbasedandornutritionalmarkersinpatientswithstageiigastriccancer