Cargando…

FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST

AIM: Evaluate response and predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria and PET Response Criteria in solid Tumours (PERCIST). METHODS: From Decemb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Depardon, Edouard, Kanoun, Salim, Humbert, Olivier, Bertaut, Aurélie, Riedinger, Jean-Marc, Tal, Ilan, Vrigneaud, Jean-Marc, Lasserre, Maud, Toubeau, Michel, Berriolo-Riedinger, Alina, Dygai-Cochet, Inna, Fumoleau, Pierre, Brunotte, François, Cochet, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6047783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30011328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199529
_version_ 1783339987520978944
author Depardon, Edouard
Kanoun, Salim
Humbert, Olivier
Bertaut, Aurélie
Riedinger, Jean-Marc
Tal, Ilan
Vrigneaud, Jean-Marc
Lasserre, Maud
Toubeau, Michel
Berriolo-Riedinger, Alina
Dygai-Cochet, Inna
Fumoleau, Pierre
Brunotte, François
Cochet, Alexandre
author_facet Depardon, Edouard
Kanoun, Salim
Humbert, Olivier
Bertaut, Aurélie
Riedinger, Jean-Marc
Tal, Ilan
Vrigneaud, Jean-Marc
Lasserre, Maud
Toubeau, Michel
Berriolo-Riedinger, Alina
Dygai-Cochet, Inna
Fumoleau, Pierre
Brunotte, François
Cochet, Alexandre
author_sort Depardon, Edouard
collection PubMed
description AIM: Evaluate response and predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria and PET Response Criteria in solid Tumours (PERCIST). METHODS: From December 2006 to August 2013, 57 women with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer were retrospectively evaluated. FDG-PET/CT was performed within one month before treatment and repeated after at least 3 cycles of treatment. Metabolic response evaluation was evaluated by two readers according to both EORTC criteria and PERCIST, classifying the patients into 4 response groups: complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), stable metabolic disease (SMD), and progressive metabolic disease (PMD). RESULTS: With EORTC criteria, 22 patients had CMR, 17 PMR, 6 SMD and 12 PMD. With PERCIST, 20 patients had CMR, 15 PMR, 10 SMD and 12 PMD. There was agreement between EORTC and PERCIST in 84% of the patients. By log-rank analysis, metabolic response evaluated with both EORTC criteria and PERCIST was able to predict overall survival (p = 0.028 and 0.002 respectively). CMR patient group had longer median OS than patients in the combined PMR+SMD+PMD group (60 vs 26 months both with EORTC and PERCIST; p = 0.009 and 0.006 respectively). By multivariate analysis, CMR either with EORTC or PERCIST remained an independent predictor of survival. CONCLUSION: Metabolic response evaluation with EORTC criteria and PERCIST gave similar prognostic stratification for metastatic breast cancer treated with a first line of systemic therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6047783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60477832018-07-26 FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST Depardon, Edouard Kanoun, Salim Humbert, Olivier Bertaut, Aurélie Riedinger, Jean-Marc Tal, Ilan Vrigneaud, Jean-Marc Lasserre, Maud Toubeau, Michel Berriolo-Riedinger, Alina Dygai-Cochet, Inna Fumoleau, Pierre Brunotte, François Cochet, Alexandre PLoS One Research Article AIM: Evaluate response and predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria and PET Response Criteria in solid Tumours (PERCIST). METHODS: From December 2006 to August 2013, 57 women with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer were retrospectively evaluated. FDG-PET/CT was performed within one month before treatment and repeated after at least 3 cycles of treatment. Metabolic response evaluation was evaluated by two readers according to both EORTC criteria and PERCIST, classifying the patients into 4 response groups: complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), stable metabolic disease (SMD), and progressive metabolic disease (PMD). RESULTS: With EORTC criteria, 22 patients had CMR, 17 PMR, 6 SMD and 12 PMD. With PERCIST, 20 patients had CMR, 15 PMR, 10 SMD and 12 PMD. There was agreement between EORTC and PERCIST in 84% of the patients. By log-rank analysis, metabolic response evaluated with both EORTC criteria and PERCIST was able to predict overall survival (p = 0.028 and 0.002 respectively). CMR patient group had longer median OS than patients in the combined PMR+SMD+PMD group (60 vs 26 months both with EORTC and PERCIST; p = 0.009 and 0.006 respectively). By multivariate analysis, CMR either with EORTC or PERCIST remained an independent predictor of survival. CONCLUSION: Metabolic response evaluation with EORTC criteria and PERCIST gave similar prognostic stratification for metastatic breast cancer treated with a first line of systemic therapy. Public Library of Science 2018-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6047783/ /pubmed/30011328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199529 Text en © 2018 Depardon et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Depardon, Edouard
Kanoun, Salim
Humbert, Olivier
Bertaut, Aurélie
Riedinger, Jean-Marc
Tal, Ilan
Vrigneaud, Jean-Marc
Lasserre, Maud
Toubeau, Michel
Berriolo-Riedinger, Alina
Dygai-Cochet, Inna
Fumoleau, Pierre
Brunotte, François
Cochet, Alexandre
FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST
title FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST
title_full FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST
title_fullStr FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST
title_full_unstemmed FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST
title_short FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST
title_sort fdg pet/ct for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: comparison of eortc criteria and percist
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6047783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30011328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199529
work_keys_str_mv AT depardonedouard fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist
AT kanounsalim fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist
AT humbertolivier fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist
AT bertautaurelie fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist
AT riedingerjeanmarc fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist
AT talilan fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist
AT vrigneaudjeanmarc fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist
AT lasserremaud fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist
AT toubeaumichel fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist
AT berrioloriedingeralina fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist
AT dygaicochetinna fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist
AT fumoleaupierre fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist
AT brunottefrancois fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist
AT cochetalexandre fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist