Cargando…
FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST
AIM: Evaluate response and predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria and PET Response Criteria in solid Tumours (PERCIST). METHODS: From Decemb...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6047783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30011328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199529 |
_version_ | 1783339987520978944 |
---|---|
author | Depardon, Edouard Kanoun, Salim Humbert, Olivier Bertaut, Aurélie Riedinger, Jean-Marc Tal, Ilan Vrigneaud, Jean-Marc Lasserre, Maud Toubeau, Michel Berriolo-Riedinger, Alina Dygai-Cochet, Inna Fumoleau, Pierre Brunotte, François Cochet, Alexandre |
author_facet | Depardon, Edouard Kanoun, Salim Humbert, Olivier Bertaut, Aurélie Riedinger, Jean-Marc Tal, Ilan Vrigneaud, Jean-Marc Lasserre, Maud Toubeau, Michel Berriolo-Riedinger, Alina Dygai-Cochet, Inna Fumoleau, Pierre Brunotte, François Cochet, Alexandre |
author_sort | Depardon, Edouard |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Evaluate response and predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria and PET Response Criteria in solid Tumours (PERCIST). METHODS: From December 2006 to August 2013, 57 women with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer were retrospectively evaluated. FDG-PET/CT was performed within one month before treatment and repeated after at least 3 cycles of treatment. Metabolic response evaluation was evaluated by two readers according to both EORTC criteria and PERCIST, classifying the patients into 4 response groups: complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), stable metabolic disease (SMD), and progressive metabolic disease (PMD). RESULTS: With EORTC criteria, 22 patients had CMR, 17 PMR, 6 SMD and 12 PMD. With PERCIST, 20 patients had CMR, 15 PMR, 10 SMD and 12 PMD. There was agreement between EORTC and PERCIST in 84% of the patients. By log-rank analysis, metabolic response evaluated with both EORTC criteria and PERCIST was able to predict overall survival (p = 0.028 and 0.002 respectively). CMR patient group had longer median OS than patients in the combined PMR+SMD+PMD group (60 vs 26 months both with EORTC and PERCIST; p = 0.009 and 0.006 respectively). By multivariate analysis, CMR either with EORTC or PERCIST remained an independent predictor of survival. CONCLUSION: Metabolic response evaluation with EORTC criteria and PERCIST gave similar prognostic stratification for metastatic breast cancer treated with a first line of systemic therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6047783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60477832018-07-26 FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST Depardon, Edouard Kanoun, Salim Humbert, Olivier Bertaut, Aurélie Riedinger, Jean-Marc Tal, Ilan Vrigneaud, Jean-Marc Lasserre, Maud Toubeau, Michel Berriolo-Riedinger, Alina Dygai-Cochet, Inna Fumoleau, Pierre Brunotte, François Cochet, Alexandre PLoS One Research Article AIM: Evaluate response and predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria and PET Response Criteria in solid Tumours (PERCIST). METHODS: From December 2006 to August 2013, 57 women with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer were retrospectively evaluated. FDG-PET/CT was performed within one month before treatment and repeated after at least 3 cycles of treatment. Metabolic response evaluation was evaluated by two readers according to both EORTC criteria and PERCIST, classifying the patients into 4 response groups: complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), stable metabolic disease (SMD), and progressive metabolic disease (PMD). RESULTS: With EORTC criteria, 22 patients had CMR, 17 PMR, 6 SMD and 12 PMD. With PERCIST, 20 patients had CMR, 15 PMR, 10 SMD and 12 PMD. There was agreement between EORTC and PERCIST in 84% of the patients. By log-rank analysis, metabolic response evaluated with both EORTC criteria and PERCIST was able to predict overall survival (p = 0.028 and 0.002 respectively). CMR patient group had longer median OS than patients in the combined PMR+SMD+PMD group (60 vs 26 months both with EORTC and PERCIST; p = 0.009 and 0.006 respectively). By multivariate analysis, CMR either with EORTC or PERCIST remained an independent predictor of survival. CONCLUSION: Metabolic response evaluation with EORTC criteria and PERCIST gave similar prognostic stratification for metastatic breast cancer treated with a first line of systemic therapy. Public Library of Science 2018-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6047783/ /pubmed/30011328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199529 Text en © 2018 Depardon et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Depardon, Edouard Kanoun, Salim Humbert, Olivier Bertaut, Aurélie Riedinger, Jean-Marc Tal, Ilan Vrigneaud, Jean-Marc Lasserre, Maud Toubeau, Michel Berriolo-Riedinger, Alina Dygai-Cochet, Inna Fumoleau, Pierre Brunotte, François Cochet, Alexandre FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST |
title | FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST |
title_full | FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST |
title_fullStr | FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST |
title_full_unstemmed | FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST |
title_short | FDG PET/CT for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: Comparison of EORTC criteria and PERCIST |
title_sort | fdg pet/ct for prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with first line systemic therapy: comparison of eortc criteria and percist |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6047783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30011328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199529 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT depardonedouard fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist AT kanounsalim fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist AT humbertolivier fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist AT bertautaurelie fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist AT riedingerjeanmarc fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist AT talilan fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist AT vrigneaudjeanmarc fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist AT lasserremaud fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist AT toubeaumichel fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist AT berrioloriedingeralina fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist AT dygaicochetinna fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist AT fumoleaupierre fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist AT brunottefrancois fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist AT cochetalexandre fdgpetctforprognosticstratificationofpatientswithmetastaticbreastcancertreatedwithfirstlinesystemictherapycomparisonofeortccriteriaandpercist |