Cargando…
Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution
We surveyed 807 researchers (494 ecologists and 313 evolutionary biologists) about their use of Questionable Research Practices (QRPs), including cherry picking statistically significant results, p hacking, and hypothesising after the results are known (HARKing). We also asked them to estimate the p...
Autores principales: | Fraser, Hannah, Parker, Tim, Nakagawa, Shinichi, Barnett, Ashley, Fidler, Fiona |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6047784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30011289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200303 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The role of replication studies in ecology
por: Fraser, Hannah, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Replicating research in ecology and evolution: feasibility, incentives, and the cost-benefit conundrum
por: Nakagawa, Shinichi, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models
por: White, Nicole, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Identifying key questions in the ecology and evolution of cancer
por: Dujon, Antoine M., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Metaresearch for Evaluating Reproducibility in Ecology and Evolution
por: Fidler, Fiona, et al.
Publicado: (2017)