Cargando…

Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space

Encoding models for mapping voxelwise semantic tuning are typically estimated separately for each individual, limiting their generalizability. In the current report, we develop a method for estimating semantic encoding models that generalize across individuals. Functional MRI was used to measure bra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Uden, Cara E., Nastase, Samuel A., Connolly, Andrew C., Feilong, Ma, Hansen, Isabella, Gobbini, M. Ida, Haxby, James V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30042652
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00437
_version_ 1783340076186468352
author Van Uden, Cara E.
Nastase, Samuel A.
Connolly, Andrew C.
Feilong, Ma
Hansen, Isabella
Gobbini, M. Ida
Haxby, James V.
author_facet Van Uden, Cara E.
Nastase, Samuel A.
Connolly, Andrew C.
Feilong, Ma
Hansen, Isabella
Gobbini, M. Ida
Haxby, James V.
author_sort Van Uden, Cara E.
collection PubMed
description Encoding models for mapping voxelwise semantic tuning are typically estimated separately for each individual, limiting their generalizability. In the current report, we develop a method for estimating semantic encoding models that generalize across individuals. Functional MRI was used to measure brain responses while participants freely viewed a naturalistic audiovisual movie. Word embeddings capturing agent-, action-, object-, and scene-related semantic content were assigned to each imaging volume based on an annotation of the film. We constructed both conventional within-subject semantic encoding models and between-subject models where the model was trained on a subset of participants and validated on a left-out participant. Between-subject models were trained using cortical surface-based anatomical normalization or surface-based whole-cortex hyperalignment. We used hyperalignment to project group data into an individual’s unique anatomical space via a common representational space, thus leveraging a larger volume of data for out-of-sample prediction while preserving the individual’s fine-grained functional–anatomical idiosyncrasies. Our findings demonstrate that anatomical normalization degrades the spatial specificity of between-subject encoding models relative to within-subject models. Hyperalignment, on the other hand, recovers the spatial specificity of semantic tuning lost during anatomical normalization, and yields model performance exceeding that of within-subject models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6048235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60482352018-07-24 Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space Van Uden, Cara E. Nastase, Samuel A. Connolly, Andrew C. Feilong, Ma Hansen, Isabella Gobbini, M. Ida Haxby, James V. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Encoding models for mapping voxelwise semantic tuning are typically estimated separately for each individual, limiting their generalizability. In the current report, we develop a method for estimating semantic encoding models that generalize across individuals. Functional MRI was used to measure brain responses while participants freely viewed a naturalistic audiovisual movie. Word embeddings capturing agent-, action-, object-, and scene-related semantic content were assigned to each imaging volume based on an annotation of the film. We constructed both conventional within-subject semantic encoding models and between-subject models where the model was trained on a subset of participants and validated on a left-out participant. Between-subject models were trained using cortical surface-based anatomical normalization or surface-based whole-cortex hyperalignment. We used hyperalignment to project group data into an individual’s unique anatomical space via a common representational space, thus leveraging a larger volume of data for out-of-sample prediction while preserving the individual’s fine-grained functional–anatomical idiosyncrasies. Our findings demonstrate that anatomical normalization degrades the spatial specificity of between-subject encoding models relative to within-subject models. Hyperalignment, on the other hand, recovers the spatial specificity of semantic tuning lost during anatomical normalization, and yields model performance exceeding that of within-subject models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6048235/ /pubmed/30042652 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00437 Text en Copyright © 2018 Van Uden, Nastase, Connolly, Feilong, Hansen, Gobbini and Haxby. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Van Uden, Cara E.
Nastase, Samuel A.
Connolly, Andrew C.
Feilong, Ma
Hansen, Isabella
Gobbini, M. Ida
Haxby, James V.
Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space
title Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space
title_full Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space
title_fullStr Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space
title_short Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space
title_sort modeling semantic encoding in a common neural representational space
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30042652
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00437
work_keys_str_mv AT vanudencarae modelingsemanticencodinginacommonneuralrepresentationalspace
AT nastasesamuela modelingsemanticencodinginacommonneuralrepresentationalspace
AT connollyandrewc modelingsemanticencodinginacommonneuralrepresentationalspace
AT feilongma modelingsemanticencodinginacommonneuralrepresentationalspace
AT hansenisabella modelingsemanticencodinginacommonneuralrepresentationalspace
AT gobbinimida modelingsemanticencodinginacommonneuralrepresentationalspace
AT haxbyjamesv modelingsemanticencodinginacommonneuralrepresentationalspace