Cargando…
Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space
Encoding models for mapping voxelwise semantic tuning are typically estimated separately for each individual, limiting their generalizability. In the current report, we develop a method for estimating semantic encoding models that generalize across individuals. Functional MRI was used to measure bra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30042652 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00437 |
_version_ | 1783340076186468352 |
---|---|
author | Van Uden, Cara E. Nastase, Samuel A. Connolly, Andrew C. Feilong, Ma Hansen, Isabella Gobbini, M. Ida Haxby, James V. |
author_facet | Van Uden, Cara E. Nastase, Samuel A. Connolly, Andrew C. Feilong, Ma Hansen, Isabella Gobbini, M. Ida Haxby, James V. |
author_sort | Van Uden, Cara E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Encoding models for mapping voxelwise semantic tuning are typically estimated separately for each individual, limiting their generalizability. In the current report, we develop a method for estimating semantic encoding models that generalize across individuals. Functional MRI was used to measure brain responses while participants freely viewed a naturalistic audiovisual movie. Word embeddings capturing agent-, action-, object-, and scene-related semantic content were assigned to each imaging volume based on an annotation of the film. We constructed both conventional within-subject semantic encoding models and between-subject models where the model was trained on a subset of participants and validated on a left-out participant. Between-subject models were trained using cortical surface-based anatomical normalization or surface-based whole-cortex hyperalignment. We used hyperalignment to project group data into an individual’s unique anatomical space via a common representational space, thus leveraging a larger volume of data for out-of-sample prediction while preserving the individual’s fine-grained functional–anatomical idiosyncrasies. Our findings demonstrate that anatomical normalization degrades the spatial specificity of between-subject encoding models relative to within-subject models. Hyperalignment, on the other hand, recovers the spatial specificity of semantic tuning lost during anatomical normalization, and yields model performance exceeding that of within-subject models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6048235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60482352018-07-24 Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space Van Uden, Cara E. Nastase, Samuel A. Connolly, Andrew C. Feilong, Ma Hansen, Isabella Gobbini, M. Ida Haxby, James V. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Encoding models for mapping voxelwise semantic tuning are typically estimated separately for each individual, limiting their generalizability. In the current report, we develop a method for estimating semantic encoding models that generalize across individuals. Functional MRI was used to measure brain responses while participants freely viewed a naturalistic audiovisual movie. Word embeddings capturing agent-, action-, object-, and scene-related semantic content were assigned to each imaging volume based on an annotation of the film. We constructed both conventional within-subject semantic encoding models and between-subject models where the model was trained on a subset of participants and validated on a left-out participant. Between-subject models were trained using cortical surface-based anatomical normalization or surface-based whole-cortex hyperalignment. We used hyperalignment to project group data into an individual’s unique anatomical space via a common representational space, thus leveraging a larger volume of data for out-of-sample prediction while preserving the individual’s fine-grained functional–anatomical idiosyncrasies. Our findings demonstrate that anatomical normalization degrades the spatial specificity of between-subject encoding models relative to within-subject models. Hyperalignment, on the other hand, recovers the spatial specificity of semantic tuning lost during anatomical normalization, and yields model performance exceeding that of within-subject models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6048235/ /pubmed/30042652 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00437 Text en Copyright © 2018 Van Uden, Nastase, Connolly, Feilong, Hansen, Gobbini and Haxby. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Van Uden, Cara E. Nastase, Samuel A. Connolly, Andrew C. Feilong, Ma Hansen, Isabella Gobbini, M. Ida Haxby, James V. Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space |
title | Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space |
title_full | Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space |
title_fullStr | Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space |
title_short | Modeling Semantic Encoding in a Common Neural Representational Space |
title_sort | modeling semantic encoding in a common neural representational space |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30042652 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00437 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanudencarae modelingsemanticencodinginacommonneuralrepresentationalspace AT nastasesamuela modelingsemanticencodinginacommonneuralrepresentationalspace AT connollyandrewc modelingsemanticencodinginacommonneuralrepresentationalspace AT feilongma modelingsemanticencodinginacommonneuralrepresentationalspace AT hansenisabella modelingsemanticencodinginacommonneuralrepresentationalspace AT gobbinimida modelingsemanticencodinginacommonneuralrepresentationalspace AT haxbyjamesv modelingsemanticencodinginacommonneuralrepresentationalspace |