Cargando…
Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Colonoscopy is widely preferred for CRC screening and is the most commonly used method in the United States. Adequate bowel preparation is essential for successful colonosco...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018478 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i26.2833 |
_version_ | 1783340110458126336 |
---|---|
author | Kastenberg, David Bertiger, Gerald Brogadir, Stuart |
author_facet | Kastenberg, David Bertiger, Gerald Brogadir, Stuart |
author_sort | Kastenberg, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Colonoscopy is widely preferred for CRC screening and is the most commonly used method in the United States. Adequate bowel preparation is essential for successful colonoscopy CRC screening. However, up to one-quarter of colonoscopies are associated with inadequate bowel preparation, which may result in reduced polyp and adenoma detection rates, unsuccessful screens, and an increased likelihood of repeat procedure. In addition, standardized criteria and assessment scales for bowel preparation quality are lacking. While several bowel preparation quality scales are referred to in the literature, these differ greatly in grading methodology and categorization criteria. Published reliability and validity data are available for five bowel preparation quality assessment scales, which vary in several key attributes. However, clinicians and researchers continue to use a variety of bowel preparation quality measures, including nonvalidated scales, leading to potential confusion and difficulty when comparing quality results among clinicians and across clinical trials. Optimal clinical criteria for bowel preparation quality remain controversial. The use of validated bowel preparation quality scales with stringent but simple scoring criteria would help clarify clinical trial data as well as the performance of colonoscopy in clinical practice related to quality measurements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6048432 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60484322018-07-17 Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy Kastenberg, David Bertiger, Gerald Brogadir, Stuart World J Gastroenterol Minireviews Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Colonoscopy is widely preferred for CRC screening and is the most commonly used method in the United States. Adequate bowel preparation is essential for successful colonoscopy CRC screening. However, up to one-quarter of colonoscopies are associated with inadequate bowel preparation, which may result in reduced polyp and adenoma detection rates, unsuccessful screens, and an increased likelihood of repeat procedure. In addition, standardized criteria and assessment scales for bowel preparation quality are lacking. While several bowel preparation quality scales are referred to in the literature, these differ greatly in grading methodology and categorization criteria. Published reliability and validity data are available for five bowel preparation quality assessment scales, which vary in several key attributes. However, clinicians and researchers continue to use a variety of bowel preparation quality measures, including nonvalidated scales, leading to potential confusion and difficulty when comparing quality results among clinicians and across clinical trials. Optimal clinical criteria for bowel preparation quality remain controversial. The use of validated bowel preparation quality scales with stringent but simple scoring criteria would help clarify clinical trial data as well as the performance of colonoscopy in clinical practice related to quality measurements. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018-07-14 2018-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6048432/ /pubmed/30018478 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i26.2833 Text en ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Minireviews Kastenberg, David Bertiger, Gerald Brogadir, Stuart Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy |
title | Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy |
title_full | Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy |
title_fullStr | Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy |
title_short | Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy |
title_sort | bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy |
topic | Minireviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018478 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i26.2833 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kastenbergdavid bowelpreparationqualityscalesforcolonoscopy AT bertigergerald bowelpreparationqualityscalesforcolonoscopy AT brogadirstuart bowelpreparationqualityscalesforcolonoscopy |