Cargando…

Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Beneficence: A Multicultural Comparison of the Four Pathways to Meaningful Work

Meaningful work is a key element of positive functioning of employees, but what makes work meaningful? Based on research on self-determination theory, basic psychological needs, and prosocial impact, we suggest that there are four psychological satisfactions that substantially influence work meaning...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martela, Frank, Riekki, Tapani J. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30042710
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01157
_version_ 1783340112641261568
author Martela, Frank
Riekki, Tapani J. J.
author_facet Martela, Frank
Riekki, Tapani J. J.
author_sort Martela, Frank
collection PubMed
description Meaningful work is a key element of positive functioning of employees, but what makes work meaningful? Based on research on self-determination theory, basic psychological needs, and prosocial impact, we suggest that there are four psychological satisfactions that substantially influence work meaningfulness across cultures: autonomy (sense of volition), competence (sense of efficacy), relatedness (sense of caring relationships), and beneficence (sense of making a positive contribution). We test the relationships between these satisfactions and perceived meaningful work in Finland (n = 594, employees of several organizations), India (n = 342, collected through Mturk), and the United States (n = 373, collected through Mturk). Regression analyses show that – except for competence in United States – all four satisfactions are significantly and independently associated with meaningful work. Moreover, structural equation modeling shows that they fully mediated the relationship between occupational position and work meaningfulness in India and in the United States. In sum, the results support the importance of these four satisfactions in explaining the psychological underpinnings of meaningful work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6048450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60484502018-07-24 Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Beneficence: A Multicultural Comparison of the Four Pathways to Meaningful Work Martela, Frank Riekki, Tapani J. J. Front Psychol Psychology Meaningful work is a key element of positive functioning of employees, but what makes work meaningful? Based on research on self-determination theory, basic psychological needs, and prosocial impact, we suggest that there are four psychological satisfactions that substantially influence work meaningfulness across cultures: autonomy (sense of volition), competence (sense of efficacy), relatedness (sense of caring relationships), and beneficence (sense of making a positive contribution). We test the relationships between these satisfactions and perceived meaningful work in Finland (n = 594, employees of several organizations), India (n = 342, collected through Mturk), and the United States (n = 373, collected through Mturk). Regression analyses show that – except for competence in United States – all four satisfactions are significantly and independently associated with meaningful work. Moreover, structural equation modeling shows that they fully mediated the relationship between occupational position and work meaningfulness in India and in the United States. In sum, the results support the importance of these four satisfactions in explaining the psychological underpinnings of meaningful work. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6048450/ /pubmed/30042710 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01157 Text en Copyright © 2018 Martela and Riekki. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Martela, Frank
Riekki, Tapani J. J.
Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Beneficence: A Multicultural Comparison of the Four Pathways to Meaningful Work
title Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Beneficence: A Multicultural Comparison of the Four Pathways to Meaningful Work
title_full Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Beneficence: A Multicultural Comparison of the Four Pathways to Meaningful Work
title_fullStr Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Beneficence: A Multicultural Comparison of the Four Pathways to Meaningful Work
title_full_unstemmed Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Beneficence: A Multicultural Comparison of the Four Pathways to Meaningful Work
title_short Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, and Beneficence: A Multicultural Comparison of the Four Pathways to Meaningful Work
title_sort autonomy, competence, relatedness, and beneficence: a multicultural comparison of the four pathways to meaningful work
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30042710
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01157
work_keys_str_mv AT martelafrank autonomycompetencerelatednessandbeneficenceamulticulturalcomparisonofthefourpathwaystomeaningfulwork
AT riekkitapanijj autonomycompetencerelatednessandbeneficenceamulticulturalcomparisonofthefourpathwaystomeaningfulwork