Cargando…
Sequence-based nomenclature: a reply to Thines et al. and Zamora et al. and provisions for an amended proposal “from the floor” to allow DNA sequences as types of names
We reply to two recently published, multi-authored opinion papers by opponents of sequence-based nomenclature, namely Zamora et al. (IMA Fungus 9: 167–175,2018) and Thines et al. (IMA Fungus 9: 177–183, 2018). While we agree with some of the principal arguments brought forward by these authors, we a...
Autores principales: | Lücking, Robert, Kirk, Paul M., Hawksworth, David L. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Mycological Association
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018879 http://dx.doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2018.09.01.12 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reply to Oren et al., “New Phylum Names Harmonize Prokaryotic Nomenclature”
por: Sharma, Gaurav, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Reply to Lescoat et al. and to Khamis et al.
por: Adegunsoye, Ayodeji, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Reply to Chase et al. and to Milner et al.
por: Mittel, Aaron M., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Reply by Xu et al. to Haouzi et al.
por: Xu, Yonghao, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Reply by Pan et al. to Haouzi et al.
por: Pan, Chun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)