Cargando…
Ten reasons why a sequence-based nomenclature is not useful for fungi anytime soon
The large number of species still to be discovered in fungi, together with an exponentially growing number of environmental sequences that cannot be linked to known taxa, has fuelled the idea that it might be necessary to formally name fungi on the basis of sequence data only. Here we object to this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Mycological Association
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018878 http://dx.doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2018.09.01.11 |
_version_ | 1783340124211249152 |
---|---|
author | Thines, Marco Crous, Pedro W. Aime, M. Catherine Aoki, Takayuki Cai, Lei Hyde, Kevin D. Miller, Andrew N. Zhang, Ning Stadler, Marc |
author_facet | Thines, Marco Crous, Pedro W. Aime, M. Catherine Aoki, Takayuki Cai, Lei Hyde, Kevin D. Miller, Andrew N. Zhang, Ning Stadler, Marc |
author_sort | Thines, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | The large number of species still to be discovered in fungi, together with an exponentially growing number of environmental sequences that cannot be linked to known taxa, has fuelled the idea that it might be necessary to formally name fungi on the basis of sequence data only. Here we object to this idea due to several shortcomings of the approach, ranging from concerns regarding reproducibility and the violation of general scientific principles to ethical issues. We come to the conclusion that sequence-based nomenclature is potentially harmful for mycology as a discipline. Additionally, a classification based on sequences as types is not within reach anytime soon, because there is a lack of consensus regarding common standards due to the fast pace at which sequencing technologies develop. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6048572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | International Mycological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60485722018-07-17 Ten reasons why a sequence-based nomenclature is not useful for fungi anytime soon Thines, Marco Crous, Pedro W. Aime, M. Catherine Aoki, Takayuki Cai, Lei Hyde, Kevin D. Miller, Andrew N. Zhang, Ning Stadler, Marc IMA Fungus Article The large number of species still to be discovered in fungi, together with an exponentially growing number of environmental sequences that cannot be linked to known taxa, has fuelled the idea that it might be necessary to formally name fungi on the basis of sequence data only. Here we object to this idea due to several shortcomings of the approach, ranging from concerns regarding reproducibility and the violation of general scientific principles to ethical issues. We come to the conclusion that sequence-based nomenclature is potentially harmful for mycology as a discipline. Additionally, a classification based on sequences as types is not within reach anytime soon, because there is a lack of consensus regarding common standards due to the fast pace at which sequencing technologies develop. International Mycological Association 2018-05-28 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6048572/ /pubmed/30018878 http://dx.doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2018.09.01.11 Text en © 2018 International Mycological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode You are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work, under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non-commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No derivative works: You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work, which can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights. |
spellingShingle | Article Thines, Marco Crous, Pedro W. Aime, M. Catherine Aoki, Takayuki Cai, Lei Hyde, Kevin D. Miller, Andrew N. Zhang, Ning Stadler, Marc Ten reasons why a sequence-based nomenclature is not useful for fungi anytime soon |
title | Ten reasons why a sequence-based nomenclature is not useful for fungi anytime soon |
title_full | Ten reasons why a sequence-based nomenclature is not useful for fungi anytime soon |
title_fullStr | Ten reasons why a sequence-based nomenclature is not useful for fungi anytime soon |
title_full_unstemmed | Ten reasons why a sequence-based nomenclature is not useful for fungi anytime soon |
title_short | Ten reasons why a sequence-based nomenclature is not useful for fungi anytime soon |
title_sort | ten reasons why a sequence-based nomenclature is not useful for fungi anytime soon |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30018878 http://dx.doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2018.09.01.11 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thinesmarco tenreasonswhyasequencebasednomenclatureisnotusefulforfungianytimesoon AT crouspedrow tenreasonswhyasequencebasednomenclatureisnotusefulforfungianytimesoon AT aimemcatherine tenreasonswhyasequencebasednomenclatureisnotusefulforfungianytimesoon AT aokitakayuki tenreasonswhyasequencebasednomenclatureisnotusefulforfungianytimesoon AT cailei tenreasonswhyasequencebasednomenclatureisnotusefulforfungianytimesoon AT hydekevind tenreasonswhyasequencebasednomenclatureisnotusefulforfungianytimesoon AT millerandrewn tenreasonswhyasequencebasednomenclatureisnotusefulforfungianytimesoon AT zhangning tenreasonswhyasequencebasednomenclatureisnotusefulforfungianytimesoon AT stadlermarc tenreasonswhyasequencebasednomenclatureisnotusefulforfungianytimesoon |