Cargando…

Tenofovir alafenamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: rationale and clinical trial evidence

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a novel prodrug of tenofovir was developed to deliver enhanced antiviral potency and reduced systemic toxicities by more efficient intracellular delivery of the active metabolite tenofovir disphosphate than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). In two randomized, double-b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Byrne, Ruth, Carey, Ivana, Agarwal, Kosh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284818786108
_version_ 1783340126116511744
author Byrne, Ruth
Carey, Ivana
Agarwal, Kosh
author_facet Byrne, Ruth
Carey, Ivana
Agarwal, Kosh
author_sort Byrne, Ruth
collection PubMed
description Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a novel prodrug of tenofovir was developed to deliver enhanced antiviral potency and reduced systemic toxicities by more efficient intracellular delivery of the active metabolite tenofovir disphosphate than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). In two randomized, double-blind, multinational phase III trials in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive or -negative infection, TAF 25 mg was non-inferior to TDF 300 mg in achieving the primary efficacy outcome of a hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level < 29 IU/ml at week 48 and was associated with higher rates of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization based on AASLD (American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases) criteria. TAF was well tolerated with low rates of adverse events, comparable to TDF. A significantly lower decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was observed in patients receiving TAF compared with patients receiving TDF and loss of bone mineral density at the hip and spine was significantly lower in the TAF groups. These trends continued to week 96. The requirement for long-term therapy in chronic HBV highlights the importance of these efficacy and safety trends, however their true clinical relevance is yet to be established and further studies with long-term follow up and real-world clinical data are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6048601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60486012018-07-20 Tenofovir alafenamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: rationale and clinical trial evidence Byrne, Ruth Carey, Ivana Agarwal, Kosh Therap Adv Gastroenterol Review Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a novel prodrug of tenofovir was developed to deliver enhanced antiviral potency and reduced systemic toxicities by more efficient intracellular delivery of the active metabolite tenofovir disphosphate than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). In two randomized, double-blind, multinational phase III trials in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive or -negative infection, TAF 25 mg was non-inferior to TDF 300 mg in achieving the primary efficacy outcome of a hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level < 29 IU/ml at week 48 and was associated with higher rates of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization based on AASLD (American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases) criteria. TAF was well tolerated with low rates of adverse events, comparable to TDF. A significantly lower decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was observed in patients receiving TAF compared with patients receiving TDF and loss of bone mineral density at the hip and spine was significantly lower in the TAF groups. These trends continued to week 96. The requirement for long-term therapy in chronic HBV highlights the importance of these efficacy and safety trends, however their true clinical relevance is yet to be established and further studies with long-term follow up and real-world clinical data are needed. SAGE Publications 2018-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6048601/ /pubmed/30034532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284818786108 Text en © The Author(s), 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Byrne, Ruth
Carey, Ivana
Agarwal, Kosh
Tenofovir alafenamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: rationale and clinical trial evidence
title Tenofovir alafenamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: rationale and clinical trial evidence
title_full Tenofovir alafenamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: rationale and clinical trial evidence
title_fullStr Tenofovir alafenamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: rationale and clinical trial evidence
title_full_unstemmed Tenofovir alafenamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: rationale and clinical trial evidence
title_short Tenofovir alafenamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: rationale and clinical trial evidence
title_sort tenofovir alafenamide in the treatment of chronic hepatitis b virus infection: rationale and clinical trial evidence
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284818786108
work_keys_str_mv AT byrneruth tenofoviralafenamideinthetreatmentofchronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrationaleandclinicaltrialevidence
AT careyivana tenofoviralafenamideinthetreatmentofchronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrationaleandclinicaltrialevidence
AT agarwalkosh tenofoviralafenamideinthetreatmentofchronichepatitisbvirusinfectionrationaleandclinicaltrialevidence