Cargando…

Contemporary best practice in the management of malignant pleural effusion

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) affects more than 1 million people globally. There is a dearth of evidence on the therapeutic approach to MPE, and not surprisingly a high degree of variability in the management thereof. We aimed to provide practicing clinicians with an overview of the current evide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koegelenberg, Coenraad F.N., Shaw, Jane A., Irusen, Elvis M., Lee, Y. C. Gary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29952251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753466618785098
_version_ 1783340132399579136
author Koegelenberg, Coenraad F.N.
Shaw, Jane A.
Irusen, Elvis M.
Lee, Y. C. Gary
author_facet Koegelenberg, Coenraad F.N.
Shaw, Jane A.
Irusen, Elvis M.
Lee, Y. C. Gary
author_sort Koegelenberg, Coenraad F.N.
collection PubMed
description Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) affects more than 1 million people globally. There is a dearth of evidence on the therapeutic approach to MPE, and not surprisingly a high degree of variability in the management thereof. We aimed to provide practicing clinicians with an overview of the current evidence on the management of MPE, preferentially focusing on studies that report patient-related outcomes rather than pleurodesis alone, and to provide guidance on how to approach individual cases. A pleural intervention for MPE will perforce be palliative in nature. A therapeutic thoracentesis provides immediate relief for most. It can be repeated, especially in patients with a slow rate of recurrence and a short anticipated survival. Definitive interventions, individualized according the patient’s wishes, performance status, prognosis and other considerations (including the ability of the lung to expand) should be offered to the remainder of patients. Chemical pleurodesis (achieved via intercostal drain or pleuroscopy) and indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) have equal impact on patient-based outcomes, although patients treated with IPC spend less time in hospital and have less need for repeat pleural drainage interventions. Talc slurry via IPC is an attractive recently validated option for patients who do not have a nonexpandable lung.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6048656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60486562018-07-19 Contemporary best practice in the management of malignant pleural effusion Koegelenberg, Coenraad F.N. Shaw, Jane A. Irusen, Elvis M. Lee, Y. C. Gary Ther Adv Respir Dis Review Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) affects more than 1 million people globally. There is a dearth of evidence on the therapeutic approach to MPE, and not surprisingly a high degree of variability in the management thereof. We aimed to provide practicing clinicians with an overview of the current evidence on the management of MPE, preferentially focusing on studies that report patient-related outcomes rather than pleurodesis alone, and to provide guidance on how to approach individual cases. A pleural intervention for MPE will perforce be palliative in nature. A therapeutic thoracentesis provides immediate relief for most. It can be repeated, especially in patients with a slow rate of recurrence and a short anticipated survival. Definitive interventions, individualized according the patient’s wishes, performance status, prognosis and other considerations (including the ability of the lung to expand) should be offered to the remainder of patients. Chemical pleurodesis (achieved via intercostal drain or pleuroscopy) and indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) have equal impact on patient-based outcomes, although patients treated with IPC spend less time in hospital and have less need for repeat pleural drainage interventions. Talc slurry via IPC is an attractive recently validated option for patients who do not have a nonexpandable lung. SAGE Publications 2018-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6048656/ /pubmed/29952251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753466618785098 Text en © The Author(s), 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Koegelenberg, Coenraad F.N.
Shaw, Jane A.
Irusen, Elvis M.
Lee, Y. C. Gary
Contemporary best practice in the management of malignant pleural effusion
title Contemporary best practice in the management of malignant pleural effusion
title_full Contemporary best practice in the management of malignant pleural effusion
title_fullStr Contemporary best practice in the management of malignant pleural effusion
title_full_unstemmed Contemporary best practice in the management of malignant pleural effusion
title_short Contemporary best practice in the management of malignant pleural effusion
title_sort contemporary best practice in the management of malignant pleural effusion
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29952251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753466618785098
work_keys_str_mv AT koegelenbergcoenraadfn contemporarybestpracticeinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusion
AT shawjanea contemporarybestpracticeinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusion
AT irusenelvism contemporarybestpracticeinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusion
AT leeycgary contemporarybestpracticeinthemanagementofmalignantpleuraleffusion