Cargando…

Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies

INTRODUCTION: To compare the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma who were ineligible for resection or ablation therapies. METHODS: A total of 150 patients with 185 hepatoc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kimura, Tomoki, Aikata, Hiroshi, Doi, Yoshiko, Imano, Nobuki, Takeuchi, Yuki, Takahashi, Ippei, Nishibuchi, Ikuno, Katsuta, Tsuyoshi, Kenjo, Masahiro, Murakami, Yuji, Awai, Kazuo, Chayama, Kazuaki, Nagata, Yasushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033818783450
_version_ 1783340133349588992
author Kimura, Tomoki
Aikata, Hiroshi
Doi, Yoshiko
Imano, Nobuki
Takeuchi, Yuki
Takahashi, Ippei
Nishibuchi, Ikuno
Katsuta, Tsuyoshi
Kenjo, Masahiro
Murakami, Yuji
Awai, Kazuo
Chayama, Kazuaki
Nagata, Yasushi
author_facet Kimura, Tomoki
Aikata, Hiroshi
Doi, Yoshiko
Imano, Nobuki
Takeuchi, Yuki
Takahashi, Ippei
Nishibuchi, Ikuno
Katsuta, Tsuyoshi
Kenjo, Masahiro
Murakami, Yuji
Awai, Kazuo
Chayama, Kazuaki
Nagata, Yasushi
author_sort Kimura, Tomoki
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To compare the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma who were ineligible for resection or ablation therapies. METHODS: A total of 150 patients with 185 hepatocellular carcinoma (≤3 nodules, Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A or B, and no vascular or extrahepatic metastases) were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. In principle, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was combined before stereotactic body radiation therapy (combination group), but some patients were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy alone. The prescribed dose of stereotactic body radiation therapy was 48 Gy in 4 fractions at the isocenter and 40 Gy in 4 or 5 fractions at the dose covering 95% of the planning target volume. The overall survival, progression-free survival, local progression free survival, and complication rates were retrospectively compared between the groups. Local progression was defined as irradiated tumor growth in dynamic computed tomography follow-up. Tumor responses were assessed according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Treatment-related toxicities were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS: Twenty-eight and 122 patients were enrolled in the stereotactic body radiation therapy alone and combination groups, respectively. The median follow-up periods were 16 and 29 months, respectively. The 2-year overall, progression-free, and local progression-free survival times in stereotactic body radiation therapy alone and combination groups were 78.6% and 80.3% (P = .6583), 49.0% and 42.9% (P = .188), and 71.4% and 80.8% (P = .9661), respectively. The incidence of ≥grade 3 toxicities was 17.9% in stereotactic body radiation therapy alone group and 18.9% in combination group (P = .903). CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic body radiation therapy alone may be a good treatment option for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma who were ineligible for resection or ablation therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6048660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60486602018-07-20 Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies Kimura, Tomoki Aikata, Hiroshi Doi, Yoshiko Imano, Nobuki Takeuchi, Yuki Takahashi, Ippei Nishibuchi, Ikuno Katsuta, Tsuyoshi Kenjo, Masahiro Murakami, Yuji Awai, Kazuo Chayama, Kazuaki Nagata, Yasushi Technol Cancer Res Treat Special Collection on Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Cancers of Various Organs—Research Paper INTRODUCTION: To compare the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma who were ineligible for resection or ablation therapies. METHODS: A total of 150 patients with 185 hepatocellular carcinoma (≤3 nodules, Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A or B, and no vascular or extrahepatic metastases) were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. In principle, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was combined before stereotactic body radiation therapy (combination group), but some patients were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy alone. The prescribed dose of stereotactic body radiation therapy was 48 Gy in 4 fractions at the isocenter and 40 Gy in 4 or 5 fractions at the dose covering 95% of the planning target volume. The overall survival, progression-free survival, local progression free survival, and complication rates were retrospectively compared between the groups. Local progression was defined as irradiated tumor growth in dynamic computed tomography follow-up. Tumor responses were assessed according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Treatment-related toxicities were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS: Twenty-eight and 122 patients were enrolled in the stereotactic body radiation therapy alone and combination groups, respectively. The median follow-up periods were 16 and 29 months, respectively. The 2-year overall, progression-free, and local progression-free survival times in stereotactic body radiation therapy alone and combination groups were 78.6% and 80.3% (P = .6583), 49.0% and 42.9% (P = .188), and 71.4% and 80.8% (P = .9661), respectively. The incidence of ≥grade 3 toxicities was 17.9% in stereotactic body radiation therapy alone group and 18.9% in combination group (P = .903). CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic body radiation therapy alone may be a good treatment option for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma who were ineligible for resection or ablation therapies. SAGE Publications 2018-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6048660/ /pubmed/29963972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033818783450 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Special Collection on Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Cancers of Various Organs—Research Paper
Kimura, Tomoki
Aikata, Hiroshi
Doi, Yoshiko
Imano, Nobuki
Takeuchi, Yuki
Takahashi, Ippei
Nishibuchi, Ikuno
Katsuta, Tsuyoshi
Kenjo, Masahiro
Murakami, Yuji
Awai, Kazuo
Chayama, Kazuaki
Nagata, Yasushi
Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies
title Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies
title_full Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies
title_fullStr Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies
title_short Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies
title_sort comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy combined with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for resection or ablation therapies
topic Special Collection on Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Cancers of Various Organs—Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033818783450
work_keys_str_mv AT kimuratomoki comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies
AT aikatahiroshi comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies
AT doiyoshiko comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies
AT imanonobuki comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies
AT takeuchiyuki comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies
AT takahashiippei comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies
AT nishibuchiikuno comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies
AT katsutatsuyoshi comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies
AT kenjomasahiro comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies
AT murakamiyuji comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies
AT awaikazuo comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies
AT chayamakazuaki comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies
AT nagatayasushi comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies