Cargando…
Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies
INTRODUCTION: To compare the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma who were ineligible for resection or ablation therapies. METHODS: A total of 150 patients with 185 hepatoc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033818783450 |
_version_ | 1783340133349588992 |
---|---|
author | Kimura, Tomoki Aikata, Hiroshi Doi, Yoshiko Imano, Nobuki Takeuchi, Yuki Takahashi, Ippei Nishibuchi, Ikuno Katsuta, Tsuyoshi Kenjo, Masahiro Murakami, Yuji Awai, Kazuo Chayama, Kazuaki Nagata, Yasushi |
author_facet | Kimura, Tomoki Aikata, Hiroshi Doi, Yoshiko Imano, Nobuki Takeuchi, Yuki Takahashi, Ippei Nishibuchi, Ikuno Katsuta, Tsuyoshi Kenjo, Masahiro Murakami, Yuji Awai, Kazuo Chayama, Kazuaki Nagata, Yasushi |
author_sort | Kimura, Tomoki |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To compare the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma who were ineligible for resection or ablation therapies. METHODS: A total of 150 patients with 185 hepatocellular carcinoma (≤3 nodules, Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A or B, and no vascular or extrahepatic metastases) were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. In principle, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was combined before stereotactic body radiation therapy (combination group), but some patients were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy alone. The prescribed dose of stereotactic body radiation therapy was 48 Gy in 4 fractions at the isocenter and 40 Gy in 4 or 5 fractions at the dose covering 95% of the planning target volume. The overall survival, progression-free survival, local progression free survival, and complication rates were retrospectively compared between the groups. Local progression was defined as irradiated tumor growth in dynamic computed tomography follow-up. Tumor responses were assessed according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Treatment-related toxicities were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS: Twenty-eight and 122 patients were enrolled in the stereotactic body radiation therapy alone and combination groups, respectively. The median follow-up periods were 16 and 29 months, respectively. The 2-year overall, progression-free, and local progression-free survival times in stereotactic body radiation therapy alone and combination groups were 78.6% and 80.3% (P = .6583), 49.0% and 42.9% (P = .188), and 71.4% and 80.8% (P = .9661), respectively. The incidence of ≥grade 3 toxicities was 17.9% in stereotactic body radiation therapy alone group and 18.9% in combination group (P = .903). CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic body radiation therapy alone may be a good treatment option for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma who were ineligible for resection or ablation therapies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6048660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60486602018-07-20 Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies Kimura, Tomoki Aikata, Hiroshi Doi, Yoshiko Imano, Nobuki Takeuchi, Yuki Takahashi, Ippei Nishibuchi, Ikuno Katsuta, Tsuyoshi Kenjo, Masahiro Murakami, Yuji Awai, Kazuo Chayama, Kazuaki Nagata, Yasushi Technol Cancer Res Treat Special Collection on Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Cancers of Various Organs—Research Paper INTRODUCTION: To compare the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma who were ineligible for resection or ablation therapies. METHODS: A total of 150 patients with 185 hepatocellular carcinoma (≤3 nodules, Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A or B, and no vascular or extrahepatic metastases) were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. In principle, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was combined before stereotactic body radiation therapy (combination group), but some patients were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy alone. The prescribed dose of stereotactic body radiation therapy was 48 Gy in 4 fractions at the isocenter and 40 Gy in 4 or 5 fractions at the dose covering 95% of the planning target volume. The overall survival, progression-free survival, local progression free survival, and complication rates were retrospectively compared between the groups. Local progression was defined as irradiated tumor growth in dynamic computed tomography follow-up. Tumor responses were assessed according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Treatment-related toxicities were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. RESULTS: Twenty-eight and 122 patients were enrolled in the stereotactic body radiation therapy alone and combination groups, respectively. The median follow-up periods were 16 and 29 months, respectively. The 2-year overall, progression-free, and local progression-free survival times in stereotactic body radiation therapy alone and combination groups were 78.6% and 80.3% (P = .6583), 49.0% and 42.9% (P = .188), and 71.4% and 80.8% (P = .9661), respectively. The incidence of ≥grade 3 toxicities was 17.9% in stereotactic body radiation therapy alone group and 18.9% in combination group (P = .903). CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic body radiation therapy alone may be a good treatment option for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma who were ineligible for resection or ablation therapies. SAGE Publications 2018-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6048660/ /pubmed/29963972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033818783450 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Special Collection on Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Cancers of Various Organs—Research Paper Kimura, Tomoki Aikata, Hiroshi Doi, Yoshiko Imano, Nobuki Takeuchi, Yuki Takahashi, Ippei Nishibuchi, Ikuno Katsuta, Tsuyoshi Kenjo, Masahiro Murakami, Yuji Awai, Kazuo Chayama, Kazuaki Nagata, Yasushi Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies |
title | Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies |
title_full | Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies |
title_short | Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With or Without
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Patients With Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Ineligible for Resection or Ablation Therapies |
title_sort | comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy combined with or without
transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma
ineligible for resection or ablation therapies |
topic | Special Collection on Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Cancers of Various Organs—Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1533033818783450 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimuratomoki comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies AT aikatahiroshi comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies AT doiyoshiko comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies AT imanonobuki comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies AT takeuchiyuki comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies AT takahashiippei comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies AT nishibuchiikuno comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies AT katsutatsuyoshi comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies AT kenjomasahiro comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies AT murakamiyuji comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies AT awaikazuo comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies AT chayamakazuaki comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies AT nagatayasushi comparisonofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapycombinedwithorwithouttranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationforpatientswithsmallhepatocellularcarcinomaineligibleforresectionorablationtherapies |