Cargando…

The short-term effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation on anorectal physiology in patients with faecal incontinence: a single centre experience

BACKGROUND: Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a novel treatment for patients with faecal incontinence (FI) and may be effective in selected patients; however, its mechanism of action is unknown. We sought to determine the effects of PTNS on anorectal physiological parameters. METHODS: Fif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heywood, Nick A., Pearson, James S., Nicholson, James E., Molyneux, Clare, Sharma, Abhiram, Kiff, Edward S., Whorwell, Peter J., Telford, Karen J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284818786111
_version_ 1783340134293307392
author Heywood, Nick A.
Pearson, James S.
Nicholson, James E.
Molyneux, Clare
Sharma, Abhiram
Kiff, Edward S.
Whorwell, Peter J.
Telford, Karen J.
author_facet Heywood, Nick A.
Pearson, James S.
Nicholson, James E.
Molyneux, Clare
Sharma, Abhiram
Kiff, Edward S.
Whorwell, Peter J.
Telford, Karen J.
author_sort Heywood, Nick A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a novel treatment for patients with faecal incontinence (FI) and may be effective in selected patients; however, its mechanism of action is unknown. We sought to determine the effects of PTNS on anorectal physiological parameters. METHODS: Fifty patients with FI underwent 30 min of PTNS treatment, weekly for 12 weeks. High-resolution anorectal manometry, bowel diaries and Vaizey questionnaires were performed before and after treatment. Successful treatment was determined as a greater than 50% reduction in FI episodes. RESULTS: Fifty patients with FI were studied; 39 women, median age 62 years (range 30–82). Compared with pretreatment, there were reductions in episodes of urgency (16.0 versus 11.4, p = 0.006), overall FI (14.5 versus 9.1, p = 0.001), urge FI (5.4 versus 3.2, p = 0.016) and passive FI (9.1 versus 5.9, p = 0.008). Vaizey score was reduced (16.1 versus 14.5, p = 0.002). Rectal sensory volumes (ml) decreased (onset 40.3 versus 32.6, p = 0.014, call 75.7 versus 57.5, p < 0.001, urge 104.1 versus 87.4, p = 0.004). There was no significant change in anal canal pressures (mmHg) (maximum resting pressure 41.4 versus 44.2, p = 0.39, maximum squeeze pressure, 78.7 versus 88.2, p = 0.15, incremental squeeze pressure 37.2 versus 44.1, p = 0.22). Reduction in FI episodes did not correlate with changes in physiological parameters (p > 0.05). Treatment success of 44% was independent of changes in manometric parameters (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PTNS has a measureable physiological effect on rectal sensory volumes without an effect on anal canal pressures. It also reduces FI episodes; however, this effect is independent of changing physiology, suggesting that PTNS has a complex mechanism of action.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6048664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60486642018-07-20 The short-term effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation on anorectal physiology in patients with faecal incontinence: a single centre experience Heywood, Nick A. Pearson, James S. Nicholson, James E. Molyneux, Clare Sharma, Abhiram Kiff, Edward S. Whorwell, Peter J. Telford, Karen J. Therap Adv Gastroenterol Original Research BACKGROUND: Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a novel treatment for patients with faecal incontinence (FI) and may be effective in selected patients; however, its mechanism of action is unknown. We sought to determine the effects of PTNS on anorectal physiological parameters. METHODS: Fifty patients with FI underwent 30 min of PTNS treatment, weekly for 12 weeks. High-resolution anorectal manometry, bowel diaries and Vaizey questionnaires were performed before and after treatment. Successful treatment was determined as a greater than 50% reduction in FI episodes. RESULTS: Fifty patients with FI were studied; 39 women, median age 62 years (range 30–82). Compared with pretreatment, there were reductions in episodes of urgency (16.0 versus 11.4, p = 0.006), overall FI (14.5 versus 9.1, p = 0.001), urge FI (5.4 versus 3.2, p = 0.016) and passive FI (9.1 versus 5.9, p = 0.008). Vaizey score was reduced (16.1 versus 14.5, p = 0.002). Rectal sensory volumes (ml) decreased (onset 40.3 versus 32.6, p = 0.014, call 75.7 versus 57.5, p < 0.001, urge 104.1 versus 87.4, p = 0.004). There was no significant change in anal canal pressures (mmHg) (maximum resting pressure 41.4 versus 44.2, p = 0.39, maximum squeeze pressure, 78.7 versus 88.2, p = 0.15, incremental squeeze pressure 37.2 versus 44.1, p = 0.22). Reduction in FI episodes did not correlate with changes in physiological parameters (p > 0.05). Treatment success of 44% was independent of changes in manometric parameters (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PTNS has a measureable physiological effect on rectal sensory volumes without an effect on anal canal pressures. It also reduces FI episodes; however, this effect is independent of changing physiology, suggesting that PTNS has a complex mechanism of action. SAGE Publications 2018-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6048664/ /pubmed/30034533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284818786111 Text en © The Author(s), 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Heywood, Nick A.
Pearson, James S.
Nicholson, James E.
Molyneux, Clare
Sharma, Abhiram
Kiff, Edward S.
Whorwell, Peter J.
Telford, Karen J.
The short-term effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation on anorectal physiology in patients with faecal incontinence: a single centre experience
title The short-term effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation on anorectal physiology in patients with faecal incontinence: a single centre experience
title_full The short-term effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation on anorectal physiology in patients with faecal incontinence: a single centre experience
title_fullStr The short-term effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation on anorectal physiology in patients with faecal incontinence: a single centre experience
title_full_unstemmed The short-term effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation on anorectal physiology in patients with faecal incontinence: a single centre experience
title_short The short-term effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation on anorectal physiology in patients with faecal incontinence: a single centre experience
title_sort short-term effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation on anorectal physiology in patients with faecal incontinence: a single centre experience
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284818786111
work_keys_str_mv AT heywoodnicka theshorttermeffectsofposteriortibialnervestimulationonanorectalphysiologyinpatientswithfaecalincontinenceasinglecentreexperience
AT pearsonjamess theshorttermeffectsofposteriortibialnervestimulationonanorectalphysiologyinpatientswithfaecalincontinenceasinglecentreexperience
AT nicholsonjamese theshorttermeffectsofposteriortibialnervestimulationonanorectalphysiologyinpatientswithfaecalincontinenceasinglecentreexperience
AT molyneuxclare theshorttermeffectsofposteriortibialnervestimulationonanorectalphysiologyinpatientswithfaecalincontinenceasinglecentreexperience
AT sharmaabhiram theshorttermeffectsofposteriortibialnervestimulationonanorectalphysiologyinpatientswithfaecalincontinenceasinglecentreexperience
AT kiffedwards theshorttermeffectsofposteriortibialnervestimulationonanorectalphysiologyinpatientswithfaecalincontinenceasinglecentreexperience
AT whorwellpeterj theshorttermeffectsofposteriortibialnervestimulationonanorectalphysiologyinpatientswithfaecalincontinenceasinglecentreexperience
AT telfordkarenj theshorttermeffectsofposteriortibialnervestimulationonanorectalphysiologyinpatientswithfaecalincontinenceasinglecentreexperience
AT heywoodnicka shorttermeffectsofposteriortibialnervestimulationonanorectalphysiologyinpatientswithfaecalincontinenceasinglecentreexperience
AT pearsonjamess shorttermeffectsofposteriortibialnervestimulationonanorectalphysiologyinpatientswithfaecalincontinenceasinglecentreexperience
AT nicholsonjamese shorttermeffectsofposteriortibialnervestimulationonanorectalphysiologyinpatientswithfaecalincontinenceasinglecentreexperience
AT molyneuxclare shorttermeffectsofposteriortibialnervestimulationonanorectalphysiologyinpatientswithfaecalincontinenceasinglecentreexperience
AT sharmaabhiram shorttermeffectsofposteriortibialnervestimulationonanorectalphysiologyinpatientswithfaecalincontinenceasinglecentreexperience
AT kiffedwards shorttermeffectsofposteriortibialnervestimulationonanorectalphysiologyinpatientswithfaecalincontinenceasinglecentreexperience
AT whorwellpeterj shorttermeffectsofposteriortibialnervestimulationonanorectalphysiologyinpatientswithfaecalincontinenceasinglecentreexperience
AT telfordkarenj shorttermeffectsofposteriortibialnervestimulationonanorectalphysiologyinpatientswithfaecalincontinenceasinglecentreexperience