Cargando…

Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Improvements in vitrification and frozen embryo transfer (FET) technologies have rapidly increased, and some evidence suggests that FET may increase pregnancy rates and lead to more favourable perinatal outcomes. However, the outcome of interest should be offspring safety. Therefore, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Junwei, Du, Mingze, Li, Zhe, Wang, Lulu, Hu, Jijun, Zhao, Bei, Feng, Yingying, Chen, Xiaolin, Sun, Lijun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30012201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0432-x
_version_ 1783340145076862976
author Zhang, Junwei
Du, Mingze
Li, Zhe
Wang, Lulu
Hu, Jijun
Zhao, Bei
Feng, Yingying
Chen, Xiaolin
Sun, Lijun
author_facet Zhang, Junwei
Du, Mingze
Li, Zhe
Wang, Lulu
Hu, Jijun
Zhao, Bei
Feng, Yingying
Chen, Xiaolin
Sun, Lijun
author_sort Zhang, Junwei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Improvements in vitrification and frozen embryo transfer (FET) technologies have rapidly increased, and some evidence suggests that FET may increase pregnancy rates and lead to more favourable perinatal outcomes. However, the outcome of interest should be offspring safety. Therefore, the primary objective of our study was to investigate whether FET was preferable to fresh embryo transfer (ET) in terms of full-term neonatal birthweight and congenital malformations. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with no pregnancy-related complications who underwent first fresh ETs (n = 2059) or FETs (n = 2053), resulting in full-term singletons births. Outcome measures were neonatal birthweight, low birthweight (LBW), small-for-gestational age (SGA), large-for-gestational age (LGA), macrosomia and congenital malformations. Additionally, we used logistic regression to adjust for baseline characteristics (age, BMI, No. of embryos transferred and embryo stage) between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean neonatal birthweight was higher for singletons born after FET than for singletons born after fresh ET (3468.7 ± 475.3 vs. 3386.7 ± 448.1; p < 0.001). The frequencies of full-term singleton LBW and SGA after FET were significantly lower than those after fresh ET (1.7% vs. 3.0 and 4.4% vs. 6.7%, respectively), with adjusted rate ratios of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.98; p = 0.026) and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.99; p = 0.041), respectively. FET resulted in higher frequencies of macrosomia and LGA (15.1% vs 10.2 and 22.8% vs. 17.5%, respectively) than fresh ET, with adjusted rate ratios of 1.43 (95% CI, 1.16 to 1.75; p = 0.001) and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.49; p = 0.007), respectively. Furthermore, the incidence of congenital malformations was not different between the two groups (1.2% vs. 0.9%), with a rate ratio of 0.288. CONCLUSIONS: After the cycles with pregnancy-related complications were excluded and after adjustments for baseline characteristics, women undergoing FET were associated with a higher neonatal birthweight than women undergoing fresh ET cycles. Additionally, the FET protocol was associated with lower rates of LBW and SGA and higher rates of macrosomia and LGA than the fresh ET protocol. Meanwhile, no difference in the congenital malformation rate was evident between the two groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6048709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60487092018-07-19 Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study Zhang, Junwei Du, Mingze Li, Zhe Wang, Lulu Hu, Jijun Zhao, Bei Feng, Yingying Chen, Xiaolin Sun, Lijun J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: Improvements in vitrification and frozen embryo transfer (FET) technologies have rapidly increased, and some evidence suggests that FET may increase pregnancy rates and lead to more favourable perinatal outcomes. However, the outcome of interest should be offspring safety. Therefore, the primary objective of our study was to investigate whether FET was preferable to fresh embryo transfer (ET) in terms of full-term neonatal birthweight and congenital malformations. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with no pregnancy-related complications who underwent first fresh ETs (n = 2059) or FETs (n = 2053), resulting in full-term singletons births. Outcome measures were neonatal birthweight, low birthweight (LBW), small-for-gestational age (SGA), large-for-gestational age (LGA), macrosomia and congenital malformations. Additionally, we used logistic regression to adjust for baseline characteristics (age, BMI, No. of embryos transferred and embryo stage) between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean neonatal birthweight was higher for singletons born after FET than for singletons born after fresh ET (3468.7 ± 475.3 vs. 3386.7 ± 448.1; p < 0.001). The frequencies of full-term singleton LBW and SGA after FET were significantly lower than those after fresh ET (1.7% vs. 3.0 and 4.4% vs. 6.7%, respectively), with adjusted rate ratios of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.98; p = 0.026) and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.99; p = 0.041), respectively. FET resulted in higher frequencies of macrosomia and LGA (15.1% vs 10.2 and 22.8% vs. 17.5%, respectively) than fresh ET, with adjusted rate ratios of 1.43 (95% CI, 1.16 to 1.75; p = 0.001) and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.49; p = 0.007), respectively. Furthermore, the incidence of congenital malformations was not different between the two groups (1.2% vs. 0.9%), with a rate ratio of 0.288. CONCLUSIONS: After the cycles with pregnancy-related complications were excluded and after adjustments for baseline characteristics, women undergoing FET were associated with a higher neonatal birthweight than women undergoing fresh ET cycles. Additionally, the FET protocol was associated with lower rates of LBW and SGA and higher rates of macrosomia and LGA than the fresh ET protocol. Meanwhile, no difference in the congenital malformation rate was evident between the two groups. BioMed Central 2018-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6048709/ /pubmed/30012201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0432-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Junwei
Du, Mingze
Li, Zhe
Wang, Lulu
Hu, Jijun
Zhao, Bei
Feng, Yingying
Chen, Xiaolin
Sun, Lijun
Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study
title Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30012201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0432-x
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjunwei freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy
AT dumingze freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy
AT lizhe freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy
AT wanglulu freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy
AT hujijun freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhaobei freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy
AT fengyingying freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy
AT chenxiaolin freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy
AT sunlijun freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy