Cargando…
Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Improvements in vitrification and frozen embryo transfer (FET) technologies have rapidly increased, and some evidence suggests that FET may increase pregnancy rates and lead to more favourable perinatal outcomes. However, the outcome of interest should be offspring safety. Therefore, the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30012201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0432-x |
_version_ | 1783340145076862976 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Junwei Du, Mingze Li, Zhe Wang, Lulu Hu, Jijun Zhao, Bei Feng, Yingying Chen, Xiaolin Sun, Lijun |
author_facet | Zhang, Junwei Du, Mingze Li, Zhe Wang, Lulu Hu, Jijun Zhao, Bei Feng, Yingying Chen, Xiaolin Sun, Lijun |
author_sort | Zhang, Junwei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improvements in vitrification and frozen embryo transfer (FET) technologies have rapidly increased, and some evidence suggests that FET may increase pregnancy rates and lead to more favourable perinatal outcomes. However, the outcome of interest should be offspring safety. Therefore, the primary objective of our study was to investigate whether FET was preferable to fresh embryo transfer (ET) in terms of full-term neonatal birthweight and congenital malformations. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with no pregnancy-related complications who underwent first fresh ETs (n = 2059) or FETs (n = 2053), resulting in full-term singletons births. Outcome measures were neonatal birthweight, low birthweight (LBW), small-for-gestational age (SGA), large-for-gestational age (LGA), macrosomia and congenital malformations. Additionally, we used logistic regression to adjust for baseline characteristics (age, BMI, No. of embryos transferred and embryo stage) between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean neonatal birthweight was higher for singletons born after FET than for singletons born after fresh ET (3468.7 ± 475.3 vs. 3386.7 ± 448.1; p < 0.001). The frequencies of full-term singleton LBW and SGA after FET were significantly lower than those after fresh ET (1.7% vs. 3.0 and 4.4% vs. 6.7%, respectively), with adjusted rate ratios of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.98; p = 0.026) and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.99; p = 0.041), respectively. FET resulted in higher frequencies of macrosomia and LGA (15.1% vs 10.2 and 22.8% vs. 17.5%, respectively) than fresh ET, with adjusted rate ratios of 1.43 (95% CI, 1.16 to 1.75; p = 0.001) and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.49; p = 0.007), respectively. Furthermore, the incidence of congenital malformations was not different between the two groups (1.2% vs. 0.9%), with a rate ratio of 0.288. CONCLUSIONS: After the cycles with pregnancy-related complications were excluded and after adjustments for baseline characteristics, women undergoing FET were associated with a higher neonatal birthweight than women undergoing fresh ET cycles. Additionally, the FET protocol was associated with lower rates of LBW and SGA and higher rates of macrosomia and LGA than the fresh ET protocol. Meanwhile, no difference in the congenital malformation rate was evident between the two groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6048709 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60487092018-07-19 Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study Zhang, Junwei Du, Mingze Li, Zhe Wang, Lulu Hu, Jijun Zhao, Bei Feng, Yingying Chen, Xiaolin Sun, Lijun J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: Improvements in vitrification and frozen embryo transfer (FET) technologies have rapidly increased, and some evidence suggests that FET may increase pregnancy rates and lead to more favourable perinatal outcomes. However, the outcome of interest should be offspring safety. Therefore, the primary objective of our study was to investigate whether FET was preferable to fresh embryo transfer (ET) in terms of full-term neonatal birthweight and congenital malformations. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with no pregnancy-related complications who underwent first fresh ETs (n = 2059) or FETs (n = 2053), resulting in full-term singletons births. Outcome measures were neonatal birthweight, low birthweight (LBW), small-for-gestational age (SGA), large-for-gestational age (LGA), macrosomia and congenital malformations. Additionally, we used logistic regression to adjust for baseline characteristics (age, BMI, No. of embryos transferred and embryo stage) between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean neonatal birthweight was higher for singletons born after FET than for singletons born after fresh ET (3468.7 ± 475.3 vs. 3386.7 ± 448.1; p < 0.001). The frequencies of full-term singleton LBW and SGA after FET were significantly lower than those after fresh ET (1.7% vs. 3.0 and 4.4% vs. 6.7%, respectively), with adjusted rate ratios of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.98; p = 0.026) and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.99; p = 0.041), respectively. FET resulted in higher frequencies of macrosomia and LGA (15.1% vs 10.2 and 22.8% vs. 17.5%, respectively) than fresh ET, with adjusted rate ratios of 1.43 (95% CI, 1.16 to 1.75; p = 0.001) and 1.26 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.49; p = 0.007), respectively. Furthermore, the incidence of congenital malformations was not different between the two groups (1.2% vs. 0.9%), with a rate ratio of 0.288. CONCLUSIONS: After the cycles with pregnancy-related complications were excluded and after adjustments for baseline characteristics, women undergoing FET were associated with a higher neonatal birthweight than women undergoing fresh ET cycles. Additionally, the FET protocol was associated with lower rates of LBW and SGA and higher rates of macrosomia and LGA than the fresh ET protocol. Meanwhile, no difference in the congenital malformation rate was evident between the two groups. BioMed Central 2018-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6048709/ /pubmed/30012201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0432-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Zhang, Junwei Du, Mingze Li, Zhe Wang, Lulu Hu, Jijun Zhao, Bei Feng, Yingying Chen, Xiaolin Sun, Lijun Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study |
title | Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30012201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-018-0432-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangjunwei freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy AT dumingze freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy AT lizhe freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy AT wanglulu freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy AT hujijun freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy AT zhaobei freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy AT fengyingying freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy AT chenxiaolin freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy AT sunlijun freshversusfrozenembryotransferforfulltermsingletonbirtharetrospectivecohortstudy |