Cargando…

The development of an outcome measure for liaison mental health services

AIMS AND METHOD: To develop and pilot a clinician-rated outcome scale to evaluate symptomatic outcomes in liaison psychiatry services. Three hundred and sixty patient contacts with 207 separate individuals were rated using six subscales (mood, psychosis, cognition, substance misuse, mind–body proble...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guthrie, Else, Harrison, Mathew, Brown, Richard, Sandhu, Rajdeep, Trigwell, Peter, Abraham, Seri, Nawaz, Shazada, Kelsall, Peter, Thomasson, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29501073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2017.28
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS AND METHOD: To develop and pilot a clinician-rated outcome scale to evaluate symptomatic outcomes in liaison psychiatry services. Three hundred and sixty patient contacts with 207 separate individuals were rated using six subscales (mood, psychosis, cognition, substance misuse, mind–body problems and behavioural disturbance) plus two additional items (side-effects of medication and capacity to consent for medical treatment). Each item was rated on a five-point scale from 0 to 5 (nil, mild, moderate, severe and very severe). RESULTS: The liaison outcome measure was acceptable and easy to use. All subscales showed acceptable interrater reliability, with the exception of the mind–body subscale. Overall, the measure appears to show stability and sensitivity to change. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The measure provides a useful and robust way to determine symptomatic change in a liaison mental health setting, although the mind–body subscale requires modification. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None.