Cargando…

Protocol for a phase III pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening and guidelines with, versus without, implementation strategies for improving pain in adults with cancer attending outpatient oncology and palliative care services: the Stop Cancer PAIN trial

BACKGROUND: Pain is a common and distressing symptom in people with cancer, but is under-recognised and under-treated. Australian guidelines for ‘Cancer Pain Management in Adults’ are available on the Cancer Council Australia Cancer Guideline Wiki. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luckett, Tim, Phillips, Jane, Agar, Meera, Lam, Lawrence, Davidson, Patricia M., McCaffrey, Nicola, Boyle, Frances, Shaw, Tim, Currow, David C., Read, Alison, Hosie, Annmarie, Lovell, Melanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30012122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3318-0
_version_ 1783340153501122560
author Luckett, Tim
Phillips, Jane
Agar, Meera
Lam, Lawrence
Davidson, Patricia M.
McCaffrey, Nicola
Boyle, Frances
Shaw, Tim
Currow, David C.
Read, Alison
Hosie, Annmarie
Lovell, Melanie
author_facet Luckett, Tim
Phillips, Jane
Agar, Meera
Lam, Lawrence
Davidson, Patricia M.
McCaffrey, Nicola
Boyle, Frances
Shaw, Tim
Currow, David C.
Read, Alison
Hosie, Annmarie
Lovell, Melanie
author_sort Luckett, Tim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pain is a common and distressing symptom in people with cancer, but is under-recognised and under-treated. Australian guidelines for ‘Cancer Pain Management in Adults’ are available on the Cancer Council Australia Cancer Guideline Wiki. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a suite of guideline implementation strategies for improving pain outcomes in adults with cancer in oncology and palliative care outpatient settings. METHODS: The study will use a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled design, with oncology and palliative care outpatient services as the clusters. Patients will be eligible if they are adults with cancer and pain presenting to participating services during the study period. During an initial control arm, services will routinely screen patients for average and worst pain over the past 24 h using a 0–10 numerical rating scale (NRS) and have unfettered access to online guidelines. During the intervention arm, staff at each service will be encouraged to use: 1) a patient education booklet and self-management resource; 2) an online spaced learning cancer pain education module for clinicians from different disciplines; and 3) audit and feedback of service performance on key indices of cancer pain screening, assessment and management. Service-based clinical change champions will lead implementation of these strategies. The trial’s primary outcome will be the probability that patients initially screened as having moderate-severe (≥5/10 NRS) worst pain experience a clinically important improvement one week later, defined as  ≥ 30% reduction. Secondary outcomes will include patient empowerment and quality of life, carer experience, and cost-effectiveness. For the main analysis, linear mixed models will be used, accounting for clustering and the longitudinal design. Eighty-two patients per service at six services (N = 492) will provide > 90% power. A qualitative sub-study and analyses of structural and process factors will explore opportunities for further refinement and tailoring of the intervention. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic trial will inform implementation of guidelines across a range of oncology and palliative care outpatient service contexts. If found effective, the implementation strategies will be made freely available on the Wiki alongside the guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered 23/01/2015 on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12615000064505).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6048744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60487442018-07-19 Protocol for a phase III pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening and guidelines with, versus without, implementation strategies for improving pain in adults with cancer attending outpatient oncology and palliative care services: the Stop Cancer PAIN trial Luckett, Tim Phillips, Jane Agar, Meera Lam, Lawrence Davidson, Patricia M. McCaffrey, Nicola Boyle, Frances Shaw, Tim Currow, David C. Read, Alison Hosie, Annmarie Lovell, Melanie BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Pain is a common and distressing symptom in people with cancer, but is under-recognised and under-treated. Australian guidelines for ‘Cancer Pain Management in Adults’ are available on the Cancer Council Australia Cancer Guideline Wiki. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a suite of guideline implementation strategies for improving pain outcomes in adults with cancer in oncology and palliative care outpatient settings. METHODS: The study will use a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled design, with oncology and palliative care outpatient services as the clusters. Patients will be eligible if they are adults with cancer and pain presenting to participating services during the study period. During an initial control arm, services will routinely screen patients for average and worst pain over the past 24 h using a 0–10 numerical rating scale (NRS) and have unfettered access to online guidelines. During the intervention arm, staff at each service will be encouraged to use: 1) a patient education booklet and self-management resource; 2) an online spaced learning cancer pain education module for clinicians from different disciplines; and 3) audit and feedback of service performance on key indices of cancer pain screening, assessment and management. Service-based clinical change champions will lead implementation of these strategies. The trial’s primary outcome will be the probability that patients initially screened as having moderate-severe (≥5/10 NRS) worst pain experience a clinically important improvement one week later, defined as  ≥ 30% reduction. Secondary outcomes will include patient empowerment and quality of life, carer experience, and cost-effectiveness. For the main analysis, linear mixed models will be used, accounting for clustering and the longitudinal design. Eighty-two patients per service at six services (N = 492) will provide > 90% power. A qualitative sub-study and analyses of structural and process factors will explore opportunities for further refinement and tailoring of the intervention. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic trial will inform implementation of guidelines across a range of oncology and palliative care outpatient service contexts. If found effective, the implementation strategies will be made freely available on the Wiki alongside the guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered 23/01/2015 on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12615000064505). BioMed Central 2018-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6048744/ /pubmed/30012122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3318-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Luckett, Tim
Phillips, Jane
Agar, Meera
Lam, Lawrence
Davidson, Patricia M.
McCaffrey, Nicola
Boyle, Frances
Shaw, Tim
Currow, David C.
Read, Alison
Hosie, Annmarie
Lovell, Melanie
Protocol for a phase III pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening and guidelines with, versus without, implementation strategies for improving pain in adults with cancer attending outpatient oncology and palliative care services: the Stop Cancer PAIN trial
title Protocol for a phase III pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening and guidelines with, versus without, implementation strategies for improving pain in adults with cancer attending outpatient oncology and palliative care services: the Stop Cancer PAIN trial
title_full Protocol for a phase III pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening and guidelines with, versus without, implementation strategies for improving pain in adults with cancer attending outpatient oncology and palliative care services: the Stop Cancer PAIN trial
title_fullStr Protocol for a phase III pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening and guidelines with, versus without, implementation strategies for improving pain in adults with cancer attending outpatient oncology and palliative care services: the Stop Cancer PAIN trial
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a phase III pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening and guidelines with, versus without, implementation strategies for improving pain in adults with cancer attending outpatient oncology and palliative care services: the Stop Cancer PAIN trial
title_short Protocol for a phase III pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening and guidelines with, versus without, implementation strategies for improving pain in adults with cancer attending outpatient oncology and palliative care services: the Stop Cancer PAIN trial
title_sort protocol for a phase iii pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening and guidelines with, versus without, implementation strategies for improving pain in adults with cancer attending outpatient oncology and palliative care services: the stop cancer pain trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30012122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3318-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lucketttim protocolforaphaseiiipragmaticsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofscreeningandguidelineswithversuswithoutimplementationstrategiesforimprovingpaininadultswithcancerattendingoutpatientoncologyandpalliati
AT phillipsjane protocolforaphaseiiipragmaticsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofscreeningandguidelineswithversuswithoutimplementationstrategiesforimprovingpaininadultswithcancerattendingoutpatientoncologyandpalliati
AT agarmeera protocolforaphaseiiipragmaticsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofscreeningandguidelineswithversuswithoutimplementationstrategiesforimprovingpaininadultswithcancerattendingoutpatientoncologyandpalliati
AT lamlawrence protocolforaphaseiiipragmaticsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofscreeningandguidelineswithversuswithoutimplementationstrategiesforimprovingpaininadultswithcancerattendingoutpatientoncologyandpalliati
AT davidsonpatriciam protocolforaphaseiiipragmaticsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofscreeningandguidelineswithversuswithoutimplementationstrategiesforimprovingpaininadultswithcancerattendingoutpatientoncologyandpalliati
AT mccaffreynicola protocolforaphaseiiipragmaticsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofscreeningandguidelineswithversuswithoutimplementationstrategiesforimprovingpaininadultswithcancerattendingoutpatientoncologyandpalliati
AT boylefrances protocolforaphaseiiipragmaticsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofscreeningandguidelineswithversuswithoutimplementationstrategiesforimprovingpaininadultswithcancerattendingoutpatientoncologyandpalliati
AT shawtim protocolforaphaseiiipragmaticsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofscreeningandguidelineswithversuswithoutimplementationstrategiesforimprovingpaininadultswithcancerattendingoutpatientoncologyandpalliati
AT currowdavidc protocolforaphaseiiipragmaticsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofscreeningandguidelineswithversuswithoutimplementationstrategiesforimprovingpaininadultswithcancerattendingoutpatientoncologyandpalliati
AT readalison protocolforaphaseiiipragmaticsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofscreeningandguidelineswithversuswithoutimplementationstrategiesforimprovingpaininadultswithcancerattendingoutpatientoncologyandpalliati
AT hosieannmarie protocolforaphaseiiipragmaticsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofscreeningandguidelineswithversuswithoutimplementationstrategiesforimprovingpaininadultswithcancerattendingoutpatientoncologyandpalliati
AT lovellmelanie protocolforaphaseiiipragmaticsteppedwedgeclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofscreeningandguidelineswithversuswithoutimplementationstrategiesforimprovingpaininadultswithcancerattendingoutpatientoncologyandpalliati