Cargando…

Germline and somatic variations influence the somatic mutational signatures of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas in a Chinese population

BACKGROUND: Esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC) is the fourth most lethal cancer in China. Previous studies reveal several highly conserved mutational processes in ESCC. However, it remains unclear what are the true regulators of the mutational processes. RESULTS: We analyzed the somatic muta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Jintao, Huang, Jiankun, Zhou, Ying, Zhou, Yulin, Yu, Liying, Li, Huili, Hou, Lingyun, Zhu, Liuwei, Ge, Dandan, Zeng, Yuanyuan, Guleng, Bayasi, Li, Qiyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30012096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4906-4
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC) is the fourth most lethal cancer in China. Previous studies reveal several highly conserved mutational processes in ESCC. However, it remains unclear what are the true regulators of the mutational processes. RESULTS: We analyzed the somatic mutational signatures in 302 paired whole-exome sequencing data of ESCC in a Chinese population for potential regulators of the mutational processes. We identified three conserved subtypes based on the mutational signatures with significantly different clinical outcomes. Our results show that patients of different subpopulations of Chinese differ significantly in the activity of the “NpCpG” signature (FDR = 0.00188). In addition, we report ZNF750 and CDC27, of which the somatic statuses and the genetic burdens consistently influence the activities of specific mutational signatures in ESCC: the somatic ZNF750 status is associated with the AID/APOBEC-related mutational process (FDR = 0.0637); the somatic CDC27 copy-number is associated with the “NpCpG” (FDR = 0.00615) and the AID/APOBEC-related mutational processes (FDR = 8.69 × 10(− 4)). The burdens of germline variants in the two genes also significantly influence the activities of the same somatic mutational signatures (FDR < 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: We report multiple factors that influence the mutational processes in ESCC including: the subpopulations of Chinese; the germline and somatic statuses of ZNF750 and CDC27 and exposure to alcohol and tobacco. Our findings based on the evidences from both germline and somatic levels reveal potential genetic regulators of the somatic mutational processes and provide insights into the biology of esophageal carcinogenesis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-4906-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.