Cargando…

A cross-sectional analysis of ITN and IRS coverage in Namibia in 2013

BACKGROUND: Achieving vector control targets is a key step towards malaria elimination. Because of variations in reporting of progress towards vector control targets in 2013, the coverage of these vector control interventions in Namibia was assessed. METHODS: Data on 9846 households, representing 41...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allcock, Sophie H., Young, Elizabeth H., Sandhu, Manjinder S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30012154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2417-z
_version_ 1783340184306188288
author Allcock, Sophie H.
Young, Elizabeth H.
Sandhu, Manjinder S.
author_facet Allcock, Sophie H.
Young, Elizabeth H.
Sandhu, Manjinder S.
author_sort Allcock, Sophie H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Achieving vector control targets is a key step towards malaria elimination. Because of variations in reporting of progress towards vector control targets in 2013, the coverage of these vector control interventions in Namibia was assessed. METHODS: Data on 9846 households, representing 41,314 people, collected in the 2013 nationally-representative Namibia Demographic and Health Survey were used to explore the coverage of two vector control methods: indoor residual spraying (IRS) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). Regional data on Plasmodium falciparum parasite rate in those aged 2–10 years (PfPR(2–10)), obtained from the Malaria Atlas Project, were used to provide information on malaria transmission intensity. Poisson regression analyses were carried out exploring the relationship between household interventions and PfPR(2–10), with fully adjusted models adjusting for wealth and residence type and accounting for regional and enumeration area clustering. Additionally, the coverage as a function of government intervention zones was explored and models were compared using log-likelihood ratio tests. RESULTS: Intervention coverage was greatest in the highest transmission areas (PfPR(2–10) ≥ 5%), but was still below target levels of 95% coverage in these regions, with 27.6% of households covered by IRS, 32.3% with an ITN and 49.0% with at least one intervention (ITN and/or IRS). In fully adjusted models, PfPR(2–10) ≥ 5% was strongly associated with IRS (RR 14.54; 95% CI 5.56–38.02; p < 0.001), ITN ownership (RR 5.70; 95% CI 2.84–11.45; p < 0.001) and ITN and/or IRS coverage (RR 5.32; 95% CI 3.09–9.16; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of IRS and ITN interventions in 2013 did not reflect the Namibian government intervention targets. As such, there is a need to include quantitative monitoring of such interventions to reliably inform intervention strategies for malaria elimination in Namibia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12936-018-2417-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6048889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60488892018-07-19 A cross-sectional analysis of ITN and IRS coverage in Namibia in 2013 Allcock, Sophie H. Young, Elizabeth H. Sandhu, Manjinder S. Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Achieving vector control targets is a key step towards malaria elimination. Because of variations in reporting of progress towards vector control targets in 2013, the coverage of these vector control interventions in Namibia was assessed. METHODS: Data on 9846 households, representing 41,314 people, collected in the 2013 nationally-representative Namibia Demographic and Health Survey were used to explore the coverage of two vector control methods: indoor residual spraying (IRS) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). Regional data on Plasmodium falciparum parasite rate in those aged 2–10 years (PfPR(2–10)), obtained from the Malaria Atlas Project, were used to provide information on malaria transmission intensity. Poisson regression analyses were carried out exploring the relationship between household interventions and PfPR(2–10), with fully adjusted models adjusting for wealth and residence type and accounting for regional and enumeration area clustering. Additionally, the coverage as a function of government intervention zones was explored and models were compared using log-likelihood ratio tests. RESULTS: Intervention coverage was greatest in the highest transmission areas (PfPR(2–10) ≥ 5%), but was still below target levels of 95% coverage in these regions, with 27.6% of households covered by IRS, 32.3% with an ITN and 49.0% with at least one intervention (ITN and/or IRS). In fully adjusted models, PfPR(2–10) ≥ 5% was strongly associated with IRS (RR 14.54; 95% CI 5.56–38.02; p < 0.001), ITN ownership (RR 5.70; 95% CI 2.84–11.45; p < 0.001) and ITN and/or IRS coverage (RR 5.32; 95% CI 3.09–9.16; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of IRS and ITN interventions in 2013 did not reflect the Namibian government intervention targets. As such, there is a need to include quantitative monitoring of such interventions to reliably inform intervention strategies for malaria elimination in Namibia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12936-018-2417-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6048889/ /pubmed/30012154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2417-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Allcock, Sophie H.
Young, Elizabeth H.
Sandhu, Manjinder S.
A cross-sectional analysis of ITN and IRS coverage in Namibia in 2013
title A cross-sectional analysis of ITN and IRS coverage in Namibia in 2013
title_full A cross-sectional analysis of ITN and IRS coverage in Namibia in 2013
title_fullStr A cross-sectional analysis of ITN and IRS coverage in Namibia in 2013
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional analysis of ITN and IRS coverage in Namibia in 2013
title_short A cross-sectional analysis of ITN and IRS coverage in Namibia in 2013
title_sort cross-sectional analysis of itn and irs coverage in namibia in 2013
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6048889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30012154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2417-z
work_keys_str_mv AT allcocksophieh acrosssectionalanalysisofitnandirscoverageinnamibiain2013
AT youngelizabethh acrosssectionalanalysisofitnandirscoverageinnamibiain2013
AT sandhumanjinders acrosssectionalanalysisofitnandirscoverageinnamibiain2013
AT allcocksophieh crosssectionalanalysisofitnandirscoverageinnamibiain2013
AT youngelizabethh crosssectionalanalysisofitnandirscoverageinnamibiain2013
AT sandhumanjinders crosssectionalanalysisofitnandirscoverageinnamibiain2013