Cargando…
The association between outpatient follow-up visits and all-cause non-elective 30-day readmissions: A retrospective observational cohort study
BACKGROUND: As an effort to reduce hospital readmissions, early follow-up visits were recommended by the Society of Hospital Medicine. However, published literature on the effect of follow-up visits is limited with mixed conclusions. Our goal here is to fully explore the relationship between follow-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6049937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30016341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200691 |
_version_ | 1783340259030859776 |
---|---|
author | Tong, Liping Arnold, Tim Yang, Jie Tian, Xinyong Erdmann, Cole Esposito, Tina |
author_facet | Tong, Liping Arnold, Tim Yang, Jie Tian, Xinyong Erdmann, Cole Esposito, Tina |
author_sort | Tong, Liping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As an effort to reduce hospital readmissions, early follow-up visits were recommended by the Society of Hospital Medicine. However, published literature on the effect of follow-up visits is limited with mixed conclusions. Our goal here is to fully explore the relationship between follow-up visits and the all-cause non-elective 30-day readmission rate (RR) after adjusting for confounders. METHODS AND RESULTS: To conduct this retrospective observational study, we extracted data for 55,378 adult inpatients from Advocate Health Care, a large, multi-hospital system serving a diverse population in a major metropolitan area. These patients were discharged to Home or Home with Home Health services between June 1, 2013 and April 30, 2015. Our findings from time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models showed that follow-up visits were significantly associated with a reduced RR (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.82–0.91), but in a complicated way because the interaction between follow-up visits and a readmission risk score was significant with p-value < 0.001. Our analysis using logistic models on an adjusted data set confirmed the above findings with the following additional results. First, time matter. Follow-up visits within 2 days were associated with the greatest reduction in RR (adjusted odds ratio: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.63–0.83). Visits beyond 2 days were also associated with a reduction in RR, but the strength of the effect decreased as the time between discharge and follow-up visit increased. Second, the strength of such association varied for patients with different readmission risk scores. Patients with a risk score of 0.113, high but not extremely high risk, had the greatest reduction in RR from follow-up visits. Patients with an extremely high risk score (> 0.334) saw no RR reduction from follow-up visits. Third, a patient was much more likely to have a 2-day follow-up visit if that visit was scheduled before the patient was discharged from the hospital (30% versus < 5%). CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up visits are associated with a reduction in readmission risk. The timing of follow-up visits can be important: beyond two days, the earlier, the better. The effect of follow-up visits is more significant for patients with a high but not extremely high risk of readmission. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6049937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60499372018-07-26 The association between outpatient follow-up visits and all-cause non-elective 30-day readmissions: A retrospective observational cohort study Tong, Liping Arnold, Tim Yang, Jie Tian, Xinyong Erdmann, Cole Esposito, Tina PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: As an effort to reduce hospital readmissions, early follow-up visits were recommended by the Society of Hospital Medicine. However, published literature on the effect of follow-up visits is limited with mixed conclusions. Our goal here is to fully explore the relationship between follow-up visits and the all-cause non-elective 30-day readmission rate (RR) after adjusting for confounders. METHODS AND RESULTS: To conduct this retrospective observational study, we extracted data for 55,378 adult inpatients from Advocate Health Care, a large, multi-hospital system serving a diverse population in a major metropolitan area. These patients were discharged to Home or Home with Home Health services between June 1, 2013 and April 30, 2015. Our findings from time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models showed that follow-up visits were significantly associated with a reduced RR (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.82–0.91), but in a complicated way because the interaction between follow-up visits and a readmission risk score was significant with p-value < 0.001. Our analysis using logistic models on an adjusted data set confirmed the above findings with the following additional results. First, time matter. Follow-up visits within 2 days were associated with the greatest reduction in RR (adjusted odds ratio: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.63–0.83). Visits beyond 2 days were also associated with a reduction in RR, but the strength of the effect decreased as the time between discharge and follow-up visit increased. Second, the strength of such association varied for patients with different readmission risk scores. Patients with a risk score of 0.113, high but not extremely high risk, had the greatest reduction in RR from follow-up visits. Patients with an extremely high risk score (> 0.334) saw no RR reduction from follow-up visits. Third, a patient was much more likely to have a 2-day follow-up visit if that visit was scheduled before the patient was discharged from the hospital (30% versus < 5%). CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up visits are associated with a reduction in readmission risk. The timing of follow-up visits can be important: beyond two days, the earlier, the better. The effect of follow-up visits is more significant for patients with a high but not extremely high risk of readmission. Public Library of Science 2018-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6049937/ /pubmed/30016341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200691 Text en © 2018 Tong et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tong, Liping Arnold, Tim Yang, Jie Tian, Xinyong Erdmann, Cole Esposito, Tina The association between outpatient follow-up visits and all-cause non-elective 30-day readmissions: A retrospective observational cohort study |
title | The association between outpatient follow-up visits and all-cause non-elective 30-day readmissions: A retrospective observational cohort study |
title_full | The association between outpatient follow-up visits and all-cause non-elective 30-day readmissions: A retrospective observational cohort study |
title_fullStr | The association between outpatient follow-up visits and all-cause non-elective 30-day readmissions: A retrospective observational cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The association between outpatient follow-up visits and all-cause non-elective 30-day readmissions: A retrospective observational cohort study |
title_short | The association between outpatient follow-up visits and all-cause non-elective 30-day readmissions: A retrospective observational cohort study |
title_sort | association between outpatient follow-up visits and all-cause non-elective 30-day readmissions: a retrospective observational cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6049937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30016341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200691 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tongliping theassociationbetweenoutpatientfollowupvisitsandallcausenonelective30dayreadmissionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT arnoldtim theassociationbetweenoutpatientfollowupvisitsandallcausenonelective30dayreadmissionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT yangjie theassociationbetweenoutpatientfollowupvisitsandallcausenonelective30dayreadmissionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT tianxinyong theassociationbetweenoutpatientfollowupvisitsandallcausenonelective30dayreadmissionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT erdmanncole theassociationbetweenoutpatientfollowupvisitsandallcausenonelective30dayreadmissionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT espositotina theassociationbetweenoutpatientfollowupvisitsandallcausenonelective30dayreadmissionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT tongliping associationbetweenoutpatientfollowupvisitsandallcausenonelective30dayreadmissionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT arnoldtim associationbetweenoutpatientfollowupvisitsandallcausenonelective30dayreadmissionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT yangjie associationbetweenoutpatientfollowupvisitsandallcausenonelective30dayreadmissionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT tianxinyong associationbetweenoutpatientfollowupvisitsandallcausenonelective30dayreadmissionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT erdmanncole associationbetweenoutpatientfollowupvisitsandallcausenonelective30dayreadmissionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy AT espositotina associationbetweenoutpatientfollowupvisitsandallcausenonelective30dayreadmissionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortstudy |