Cargando…

COMPARISON BETWEEN INCIDENCE OF INCISIONAL HERNIA IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND BY SINGLE PORT

BACKGROUND: Surgeries with single port access have been gaining ground among surgeons who seek minimally invasive procedures. Although this technique uses only one access, the incision is larger when compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and this fact can lead to a higher incidence of incisional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: MADUREIRA, Fernando Athayde, GOMEZ, Cristiane Luzia Teixeira, ALMEIDA, Eduardo Monteiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6049988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29947688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020180001e1354
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Surgeries with single port access have been gaining ground among surgeons who seek minimally invasive procedures. Although this technique uses only one access, the incision is larger when compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and this fact can lead to a higher incidence of incisional hernias. AIM: To compare the incidence of incisional hernia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and by single port. METHODS: A total of 57 patients were randomly divided into two groups and submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=29) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy by single access (n=28). The patients were followed up and reviewed in a 40.4 month follow-up for identification of incisional hernias. RESULTS: Follow-up showed 21,4% of incisional hernia in single port group and 3.57% in conventional technique. CONCLUSIONS: There was a higher incidence of late incisional hernia in patients submitted to single port access cholecystectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.