Cargando…
COMPARISON BETWEEN INCIDENCE OF INCISIONAL HERNIA IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND BY SINGLE PORT
BACKGROUND: Surgeries with single port access have been gaining ground among surgeons who seek minimally invasive procedures. Although this technique uses only one access, the incision is larger when compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and this fact can lead to a higher incidence of incisional...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6049988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29947688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020180001e1354 |
_version_ | 1783340270695219200 |
---|---|
author | MADUREIRA, Fernando Athayde GOMEZ, Cristiane Luzia Teixeira ALMEIDA, Eduardo Monteiro |
author_facet | MADUREIRA, Fernando Athayde GOMEZ, Cristiane Luzia Teixeira ALMEIDA, Eduardo Monteiro |
author_sort | MADUREIRA, Fernando Athayde |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Surgeries with single port access have been gaining ground among surgeons who seek minimally invasive procedures. Although this technique uses only one access, the incision is larger when compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and this fact can lead to a higher incidence of incisional hernias. AIM: To compare the incidence of incisional hernia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and by single port. METHODS: A total of 57 patients were randomly divided into two groups and submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=29) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy by single access (n=28). The patients were followed up and reviewed in a 40.4 month follow-up for identification of incisional hernias. RESULTS: Follow-up showed 21,4% of incisional hernia in single port group and 3.57% in conventional technique. CONCLUSIONS: There was a higher incidence of late incisional hernia in patients submitted to single port access cholecystectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6049988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60499882018-07-18 COMPARISON BETWEEN INCIDENCE OF INCISIONAL HERNIA IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND BY SINGLE PORT MADUREIRA, Fernando Athayde GOMEZ, Cristiane Luzia Teixeira ALMEIDA, Eduardo Monteiro Arq Bras Cir Dig Original Article BACKGROUND: Surgeries with single port access have been gaining ground among surgeons who seek minimally invasive procedures. Although this technique uses only one access, the incision is larger when compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and this fact can lead to a higher incidence of incisional hernias. AIM: To compare the incidence of incisional hernia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and by single port. METHODS: A total of 57 patients were randomly divided into two groups and submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n=29) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy by single access (n=28). The patients were followed up and reviewed in a 40.4 month follow-up for identification of incisional hernias. RESULTS: Follow-up showed 21,4% of incisional hernia in single port group and 3.57% in conventional technique. CONCLUSIONS: There was a higher incidence of late incisional hernia in patients submitted to single port access cholecystectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2018-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6049988/ /pubmed/29947688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020180001e1354 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Article MADUREIRA, Fernando Athayde GOMEZ, Cristiane Luzia Teixeira ALMEIDA, Eduardo Monteiro COMPARISON BETWEEN INCIDENCE OF INCISIONAL HERNIA IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND BY SINGLE PORT |
title | COMPARISON BETWEEN INCIDENCE OF INCISIONAL HERNIA IN LAPAROSCOPIC
CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND BY SINGLE PORT |
title_full | COMPARISON BETWEEN INCIDENCE OF INCISIONAL HERNIA IN LAPAROSCOPIC
CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND BY SINGLE PORT |
title_fullStr | COMPARISON BETWEEN INCIDENCE OF INCISIONAL HERNIA IN LAPAROSCOPIC
CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND BY SINGLE PORT |
title_full_unstemmed | COMPARISON BETWEEN INCIDENCE OF INCISIONAL HERNIA IN LAPAROSCOPIC
CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND BY SINGLE PORT |
title_short | COMPARISON BETWEEN INCIDENCE OF INCISIONAL HERNIA IN LAPAROSCOPIC
CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND BY SINGLE PORT |
title_sort | comparison between incidence of incisional hernia in laparoscopic
cholecystectomy and by single port |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6049988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29947688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020180001e1354 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT madureirafernandoathayde comparisonbetweenincidenceofincisionalherniainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyandbysingleport AT gomezcristianeluziateixeira comparisonbetweenincidenceofincisionalherniainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyandbysingleport AT almeidaeduardomonteiro comparisonbetweenincidenceofincisionalherniainlaparoscopiccholecystectomyandbysingleport |