Cargando…
Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods
The decreasing cost and increasing scope and power of emerging genomic technologies are reshaping the field of molecular ecology. However, many modern genomic approaches (e.g., RAD‐seq) require large amounts of high‐quality template DNA. This poses a problem for an active branch of conservation biol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30026800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12600 |
_version_ | 1783340282049200128 |
---|---|
author | Carroll, Emma L. Bruford, Mike W. DeWoody, J. Andrew Leroy, Gregoire Strand, Alan Waits, Lisette Wang, Jinliang |
author_facet | Carroll, Emma L. Bruford, Mike W. DeWoody, J. Andrew Leroy, Gregoire Strand, Alan Waits, Lisette Wang, Jinliang |
author_sort | Carroll, Emma L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The decreasing cost and increasing scope and power of emerging genomic technologies are reshaping the field of molecular ecology. However, many modern genomic approaches (e.g., RAD‐seq) require large amounts of high‐quality template DNA. This poses a problem for an active branch of conservation biology: genetic monitoring using minimally invasive sampling (MIS) methods. Without handling or even observing an animal, MIS methods (e.g., collection of hair, skin, faeces) can provide genetic information on individuals or populations. Such samples typically yield low‐quality and/or quantities of DNA, restricting the type of molecular methods that can be used. Despite this limitation, genetic monitoring using MIS is an effective tool for estimating population demographic parameters and monitoring genetic diversity in natural populations. Genetic monitoring is likely to become more important in the future as many natural populations are undergoing anthropogenically driven declines, which are unlikely to abate without intensive adaptive management efforts that often include MIS approaches. Here, we profile the expanding suite of genomic methods and platforms compatible with producing genotypes from MIS, considering factors such as development costs and error rates. We evaluate how powerful new approaches will enhance our ability to investigate questions typically answered using genetic monitoring, such as estimating abundance, genetic structure and relatedness. As the field is in a period of unusually rapid transition, we also highlight the importance of legacy data sets and recommend how to address the challenges of moving between traditional and next‐generation genetic monitoring platforms. Finally, we consider how genetic monitoring could move beyond genotypes in the future. For example, assessing microbiomes or epigenetic markers could provide a greater understanding of the relationship between individuals and their environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6050181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60501812018-07-19 Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods Carroll, Emma L. Bruford, Mike W. DeWoody, J. Andrew Leroy, Gregoire Strand, Alan Waits, Lisette Wang, Jinliang Evol Appl Review and Syntheses The decreasing cost and increasing scope and power of emerging genomic technologies are reshaping the field of molecular ecology. However, many modern genomic approaches (e.g., RAD‐seq) require large amounts of high‐quality template DNA. This poses a problem for an active branch of conservation biology: genetic monitoring using minimally invasive sampling (MIS) methods. Without handling or even observing an animal, MIS methods (e.g., collection of hair, skin, faeces) can provide genetic information on individuals or populations. Such samples typically yield low‐quality and/or quantities of DNA, restricting the type of molecular methods that can be used. Despite this limitation, genetic monitoring using MIS is an effective tool for estimating population demographic parameters and monitoring genetic diversity in natural populations. Genetic monitoring is likely to become more important in the future as many natural populations are undergoing anthropogenically driven declines, which are unlikely to abate without intensive adaptive management efforts that often include MIS approaches. Here, we profile the expanding suite of genomic methods and platforms compatible with producing genotypes from MIS, considering factors such as development costs and error rates. We evaluate how powerful new approaches will enhance our ability to investigate questions typically answered using genetic monitoring, such as estimating abundance, genetic structure and relatedness. As the field is in a period of unusually rapid transition, we also highlight the importance of legacy data sets and recommend how to address the challenges of moving between traditional and next‐generation genetic monitoring platforms. Finally, we consider how genetic monitoring could move beyond genotypes in the future. For example, assessing microbiomes or epigenetic markers could provide a greater understanding of the relationship between individuals and their environment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6050181/ /pubmed/30026800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12600 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review and Syntheses Carroll, Emma L. Bruford, Mike W. DeWoody, J. Andrew Leroy, Gregoire Strand, Alan Waits, Lisette Wang, Jinliang Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods |
title | Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods |
title_full | Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods |
title_fullStr | Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods |
title_short | Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods |
title_sort | genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods |
topic | Review and Syntheses |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30026800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12600 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carrollemmal geneticandgenomicmonitoringwithminimallyinvasivesamplingmethods AT brufordmikew geneticandgenomicmonitoringwithminimallyinvasivesamplingmethods AT dewoodyjandrew geneticandgenomicmonitoringwithminimallyinvasivesamplingmethods AT leroygregoire geneticandgenomicmonitoringwithminimallyinvasivesamplingmethods AT strandalan geneticandgenomicmonitoringwithminimallyinvasivesamplingmethods AT waitslisette geneticandgenomicmonitoringwithminimallyinvasivesamplingmethods AT wangjinliang geneticandgenomicmonitoringwithminimallyinvasivesamplingmethods |