Cargando…
Comparison of the Efficacy of a Real-Time and Offline Associative Brain-Computer-Interface
An associative brain-computer-interface (BCI) that correlates in time a peripherally generated afferent volley with the peak negativity (PN) of the movement related cortical potential (MRCP) induces plastic changes in the human motor cortex. However, in this associative BCI the movement timed to a c...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00455 |
_version_ | 1783340317549789184 |
---|---|
author | Mrachacz-Kersting, Natalie Aliakbaryhosseinabadi, Susan |
author_facet | Mrachacz-Kersting, Natalie Aliakbaryhosseinabadi, Susan |
author_sort | Mrachacz-Kersting, Natalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | An associative brain-computer-interface (BCI) that correlates in time a peripherally generated afferent volley with the peak negativity (PN) of the movement related cortical potential (MRCP) induces plastic changes in the human motor cortex. However, in this associative BCI the movement timed to a cue is not detected in real time. Thus, possible changes in reaction time caused by factors such as attention shifts or fatigue will lead to a decreased accuracy, less pairings, and likely reduced plasticity. The aim of the current study was to compare the effectiveness of this associative BCI intervention on plasticity induction when the MRCP PN time is pre-determined from a training data set (BCI(offline)), or detected online (BCI(online)). Ten healthy participants completed both interventions in randomized order. The average detection accuracy for the BCI(online) intervention was 71 ± 3% with 2.8 ± 0.7 min(-1) false detections. For the BCI(online) intervention the PN did not differ significantly between the training set and the actual intervention (t(9) = 0.87, p = 0.41). The peak-to-peak motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were quantified prior to, immediately following, and 30 min after the cessation of each intervention. MEP results revealed a significant main effect of time, F((2,18)) = 4.46, p = 0.027. The mean TA MEP amplitudes were significantly larger 30 min after (277 ± 72 μV) the BCI interventions compared to pre-intervention MEPs (233 ± 64 μV) regardless of intervention type and stimulation intensity (p = 0.029). These results provide further strong support for the associative nature of the associative BCI but also suggest that they likely differ to the associative long-term potentiation protocol they were modeled on in the exact sites of plasticity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6050354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60503542018-07-26 Comparison of the Efficacy of a Real-Time and Offline Associative Brain-Computer-Interface Mrachacz-Kersting, Natalie Aliakbaryhosseinabadi, Susan Front Neurosci Neuroscience An associative brain-computer-interface (BCI) that correlates in time a peripherally generated afferent volley with the peak negativity (PN) of the movement related cortical potential (MRCP) induces plastic changes in the human motor cortex. However, in this associative BCI the movement timed to a cue is not detected in real time. Thus, possible changes in reaction time caused by factors such as attention shifts or fatigue will lead to a decreased accuracy, less pairings, and likely reduced plasticity. The aim of the current study was to compare the effectiveness of this associative BCI intervention on plasticity induction when the MRCP PN time is pre-determined from a training data set (BCI(offline)), or detected online (BCI(online)). Ten healthy participants completed both interventions in randomized order. The average detection accuracy for the BCI(online) intervention was 71 ± 3% with 2.8 ± 0.7 min(-1) false detections. For the BCI(online) intervention the PN did not differ significantly between the training set and the actual intervention (t(9) = 0.87, p = 0.41). The peak-to-peak motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were quantified prior to, immediately following, and 30 min after the cessation of each intervention. MEP results revealed a significant main effect of time, F((2,18)) = 4.46, p = 0.027. The mean TA MEP amplitudes were significantly larger 30 min after (277 ± 72 μV) the BCI interventions compared to pre-intervention MEPs (233 ± 64 μV) regardless of intervention type and stimulation intensity (p = 0.029). These results provide further strong support for the associative nature of the associative BCI but also suggest that they likely differ to the associative long-term potentiation protocol they were modeled on in the exact sites of plasticity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6050354/ /pubmed/30050400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00455 Text en Copyright © 2018 Mrachacz-Kersting and Aliakbaryhosseinabadi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Mrachacz-Kersting, Natalie Aliakbaryhosseinabadi, Susan Comparison of the Efficacy of a Real-Time and Offline Associative Brain-Computer-Interface |
title | Comparison of the Efficacy of a Real-Time and Offline Associative Brain-Computer-Interface |
title_full | Comparison of the Efficacy of a Real-Time and Offline Associative Brain-Computer-Interface |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Efficacy of a Real-Time and Offline Associative Brain-Computer-Interface |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Efficacy of a Real-Time and Offline Associative Brain-Computer-Interface |
title_short | Comparison of the Efficacy of a Real-Time and Offline Associative Brain-Computer-Interface |
title_sort | comparison of the efficacy of a real-time and offline associative brain-computer-interface |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00455 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mrachaczkerstingnatalie comparisonoftheefficacyofarealtimeandofflineassociativebraincomputerinterface AT aliakbaryhosseinabadisusan comparisonoftheefficacyofarealtimeandofflineassociativebraincomputerinterface |