Cargando…

Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length

Aim: The cardiac electrophysiology of mice and rats has been analyzed extensively, often in the context of pathological manipulations. However, the effects of beating rate on the basic electrical properties of the rodent heart remain unclear. Due to technical challenges, reported electrophysiologica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulla, Wesam, Gillis, Roni, Murninkas, Michael, Klapper-Goldstein, Hadar, Gabay, Hovav, Mor, Michal, Elyagon, Sigal, Liel-Cohen, Noah, Bernus, Olivier, Etzion, Yoram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050462
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00897
_version_ 1783340326787743744
author Mulla, Wesam
Gillis, Roni
Murninkas, Michael
Klapper-Goldstein, Hadar
Gabay, Hovav
Mor, Michal
Elyagon, Sigal
Liel-Cohen, Noah
Bernus, Olivier
Etzion, Yoram
author_facet Mulla, Wesam
Gillis, Roni
Murninkas, Michael
Klapper-Goldstein, Hadar
Gabay, Hovav
Mor, Michal
Elyagon, Sigal
Liel-Cohen, Noah
Bernus, Olivier
Etzion, Yoram
author_sort Mulla, Wesam
collection PubMed
description Aim: The cardiac electrophysiology of mice and rats has been analyzed extensively, often in the context of pathological manipulations. However, the effects of beating rate on the basic electrical properties of the rodent heart remain unclear. Due to technical challenges, reported electrophysiological studies in rodents are mainly from ex vivo preparations or under deep anesthesia, conditions that might be quite far from the normal physiological state. The aim of the current study was to characterize the ventricular rate-adaptation properties of unanesthetized rats and mice. Methods: An implanted device was chronically implanted in rodents for atrial or ventricular pacing studies. Following recovery from surgery, QT interval was evaluated in rodents exposed to atrial pacing at various frequencies. In addition, the frequency dependence of ventricular refractoriness was tested by conventional ventricular programmed stimulation protocols. Results: Our findings indicate total absence of conventional rate-adaptation properties for both QT interval and ventricular refractoriness. Using monophasic action potential recordings in isolated mice hearts we could confirm the previously reported shortening of the action potential duration at fast pacing rates. However, we found that this mild shortening did not result in similar decrease of ventricular refractory period. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that unanesthetized rodents exhibit flat QT interval and ventricular refractory period rate-dependence. This data argue against empirical use of QT interval correction methods in rodent studies. Our new methodology allowing atrial and ventricular pacing of unanesthetized freely moving rodents may facilitate more appropriate utility of these important animal models in the context of cardiac electrophysiology studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6050393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60503932018-07-26 Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length Mulla, Wesam Gillis, Roni Murninkas, Michael Klapper-Goldstein, Hadar Gabay, Hovav Mor, Michal Elyagon, Sigal Liel-Cohen, Noah Bernus, Olivier Etzion, Yoram Front Physiol Physiology Aim: The cardiac electrophysiology of mice and rats has been analyzed extensively, often in the context of pathological manipulations. However, the effects of beating rate on the basic electrical properties of the rodent heart remain unclear. Due to technical challenges, reported electrophysiological studies in rodents are mainly from ex vivo preparations or under deep anesthesia, conditions that might be quite far from the normal physiological state. The aim of the current study was to characterize the ventricular rate-adaptation properties of unanesthetized rats and mice. Methods: An implanted device was chronically implanted in rodents for atrial or ventricular pacing studies. Following recovery from surgery, QT interval was evaluated in rodents exposed to atrial pacing at various frequencies. In addition, the frequency dependence of ventricular refractoriness was tested by conventional ventricular programmed stimulation protocols. Results: Our findings indicate total absence of conventional rate-adaptation properties for both QT interval and ventricular refractoriness. Using monophasic action potential recordings in isolated mice hearts we could confirm the previously reported shortening of the action potential duration at fast pacing rates. However, we found that this mild shortening did not result in similar decrease of ventricular refractory period. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that unanesthetized rodents exhibit flat QT interval and ventricular refractory period rate-dependence. This data argue against empirical use of QT interval correction methods in rodent studies. Our new methodology allowing atrial and ventricular pacing of unanesthetized freely moving rodents may facilitate more appropriate utility of these important animal models in the context of cardiac electrophysiology studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6050393/ /pubmed/30050462 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00897 Text en Copyright © 2018 Mulla, Gillis, Murninkas, Klapper-Goldstein, Gabay, Mor, Elyagon, Liel-Cohen, Bernus and Etzion. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Mulla, Wesam
Gillis, Roni
Murninkas, Michael
Klapper-Goldstein, Hadar
Gabay, Hovav
Mor, Michal
Elyagon, Sigal
Liel-Cohen, Noah
Bernus, Olivier
Etzion, Yoram
Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length
title Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length
title_full Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length
title_fullStr Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length
title_full_unstemmed Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length
title_short Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length
title_sort unanesthetized rodents demonstrate insensitivity of qt interval and ventricular refractory period to pacing cycle length
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050462
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00897
work_keys_str_mv AT mullawesam unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength
AT gillisroni unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength
AT murninkasmichael unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength
AT klappergoldsteinhadar unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength
AT gabayhovav unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength
AT mormichal unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength
AT elyagonsigal unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength
AT lielcohennoah unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength
AT bernusolivier unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength
AT etzionyoram unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength