Cargando…
Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length
Aim: The cardiac electrophysiology of mice and rats has been analyzed extensively, often in the context of pathological manipulations. However, the effects of beating rate on the basic electrical properties of the rodent heart remain unclear. Due to technical challenges, reported electrophysiologica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050462 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00897 |
_version_ | 1783340326787743744 |
---|---|
author | Mulla, Wesam Gillis, Roni Murninkas, Michael Klapper-Goldstein, Hadar Gabay, Hovav Mor, Michal Elyagon, Sigal Liel-Cohen, Noah Bernus, Olivier Etzion, Yoram |
author_facet | Mulla, Wesam Gillis, Roni Murninkas, Michael Klapper-Goldstein, Hadar Gabay, Hovav Mor, Michal Elyagon, Sigal Liel-Cohen, Noah Bernus, Olivier Etzion, Yoram |
author_sort | Mulla, Wesam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: The cardiac electrophysiology of mice and rats has been analyzed extensively, often in the context of pathological manipulations. However, the effects of beating rate on the basic electrical properties of the rodent heart remain unclear. Due to technical challenges, reported electrophysiological studies in rodents are mainly from ex vivo preparations or under deep anesthesia, conditions that might be quite far from the normal physiological state. The aim of the current study was to characterize the ventricular rate-adaptation properties of unanesthetized rats and mice. Methods: An implanted device was chronically implanted in rodents for atrial or ventricular pacing studies. Following recovery from surgery, QT interval was evaluated in rodents exposed to atrial pacing at various frequencies. In addition, the frequency dependence of ventricular refractoriness was tested by conventional ventricular programmed stimulation protocols. Results: Our findings indicate total absence of conventional rate-adaptation properties for both QT interval and ventricular refractoriness. Using monophasic action potential recordings in isolated mice hearts we could confirm the previously reported shortening of the action potential duration at fast pacing rates. However, we found that this mild shortening did not result in similar decrease of ventricular refractory period. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that unanesthetized rodents exhibit flat QT interval and ventricular refractory period rate-dependence. This data argue against empirical use of QT interval correction methods in rodent studies. Our new methodology allowing atrial and ventricular pacing of unanesthetized freely moving rodents may facilitate more appropriate utility of these important animal models in the context of cardiac electrophysiology studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6050393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60503932018-07-26 Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length Mulla, Wesam Gillis, Roni Murninkas, Michael Klapper-Goldstein, Hadar Gabay, Hovav Mor, Michal Elyagon, Sigal Liel-Cohen, Noah Bernus, Olivier Etzion, Yoram Front Physiol Physiology Aim: The cardiac electrophysiology of mice and rats has been analyzed extensively, often in the context of pathological manipulations. However, the effects of beating rate on the basic electrical properties of the rodent heart remain unclear. Due to technical challenges, reported electrophysiological studies in rodents are mainly from ex vivo preparations or under deep anesthesia, conditions that might be quite far from the normal physiological state. The aim of the current study was to characterize the ventricular rate-adaptation properties of unanesthetized rats and mice. Methods: An implanted device was chronically implanted in rodents for atrial or ventricular pacing studies. Following recovery from surgery, QT interval was evaluated in rodents exposed to atrial pacing at various frequencies. In addition, the frequency dependence of ventricular refractoriness was tested by conventional ventricular programmed stimulation protocols. Results: Our findings indicate total absence of conventional rate-adaptation properties for both QT interval and ventricular refractoriness. Using monophasic action potential recordings in isolated mice hearts we could confirm the previously reported shortening of the action potential duration at fast pacing rates. However, we found that this mild shortening did not result in similar decrease of ventricular refractory period. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that unanesthetized rodents exhibit flat QT interval and ventricular refractory period rate-dependence. This data argue against empirical use of QT interval correction methods in rodent studies. Our new methodology allowing atrial and ventricular pacing of unanesthetized freely moving rodents may facilitate more appropriate utility of these important animal models in the context of cardiac electrophysiology studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6050393/ /pubmed/30050462 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00897 Text en Copyright © 2018 Mulla, Gillis, Murninkas, Klapper-Goldstein, Gabay, Mor, Elyagon, Liel-Cohen, Bernus and Etzion. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Mulla, Wesam Gillis, Roni Murninkas, Michael Klapper-Goldstein, Hadar Gabay, Hovav Mor, Michal Elyagon, Sigal Liel-Cohen, Noah Bernus, Olivier Etzion, Yoram Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length |
title | Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length |
title_full | Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length |
title_fullStr | Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length |
title_full_unstemmed | Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length |
title_short | Unanesthetized Rodents Demonstrate Insensitivity of QT Interval and Ventricular Refractory Period to Pacing Cycle Length |
title_sort | unanesthetized rodents demonstrate insensitivity of qt interval and ventricular refractory period to pacing cycle length |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30050462 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00897 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullawesam unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength AT gillisroni unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength AT murninkasmichael unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength AT klappergoldsteinhadar unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength AT gabayhovav unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength AT mormichal unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength AT elyagonsigal unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength AT lielcohennoah unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength AT bernusolivier unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength AT etzionyoram unanesthetizedrodentsdemonstrateinsensitivityofqtintervalandventricularrefractoryperiodtopacingcyclelength |