Cargando…
A safe teaching protocol of LRP (Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy)
PURPOSE: The LRP has a steep learning curve to obtain proficiency during which patient safety may be compromised. We present an adapted modular training system which purpose to optimize the learning curve and perform a safe surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the LRP safe lea...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28853815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0137 |
_version_ | 1783340364360318976 |
---|---|
author | Tobias-Machado, Marcos Pazeto, Cristiano Linck Neves-Neto, Oseas Castro Nunes-Silva, Igor Zampolli, Hamilton de Campos |
author_facet | Tobias-Machado, Marcos Pazeto, Cristiano Linck Neves-Neto, Oseas Castro Nunes-Silva, Igor Zampolli, Hamilton de Campos |
author_sort | Tobias-Machado, Marcos |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The LRP has a steep learning curve to obtain proficiency during which patient safety may be compromised. We present an adapted modular training system which purpose to optimize the learning curve and perform a safe surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the LRP safe learning protocol applied during a fellowship program over eight years (2008-2015). The surgery was divided in 12 steps and 5 levels of difficulty. A maximum time interval was stipulated in 240 minutes. After an adaptation, the fellows had 120 minutes to perform all the corresponding modules to its accumulated skill. The participants gradually and safely pass through the steps and difficulty levels. Surgeries performed by fellows were analyzed as a single group and compared to a prior series performed by tutor. RESULTS: In eight years, 250 LRP were performed (25 per apprentice) during fellowship program and 150 procedures after completion. The baseline characteristics were comparable. Most cases operated were of intermediate risk. Mean operative time was longer in the fellow group when compared to the tutor (150 min). Mean estimated blood loss were similar among the groups. Functional and oncological outcomes were better in the Tutor's group. No conversion to open surgery was performed. CONCLUSIONS: The LRP safe learning protocol proved to be an effective method to optimize the learning curve and perform safe surgery. However, the tutor's functional and oncological results were better, showing that this is a procedure with a steep learning curve and proficiency demands more than 25 cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6050564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60505642018-07-18 A safe teaching protocol of LRP (Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy) Tobias-Machado, Marcos Pazeto, Cristiano Linck Neves-Neto, Oseas Castro Nunes-Silva, Igor Zampolli, Hamilton de Campos Int Braz J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: The LRP has a steep learning curve to obtain proficiency during which patient safety may be compromised. We present an adapted modular training system which purpose to optimize the learning curve and perform a safe surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the LRP safe learning protocol applied during a fellowship program over eight years (2008-2015). The surgery was divided in 12 steps and 5 levels of difficulty. A maximum time interval was stipulated in 240 minutes. After an adaptation, the fellows had 120 minutes to perform all the corresponding modules to its accumulated skill. The participants gradually and safely pass through the steps and difficulty levels. Surgeries performed by fellows were analyzed as a single group and compared to a prior series performed by tutor. RESULTS: In eight years, 250 LRP were performed (25 per apprentice) during fellowship program and 150 procedures after completion. The baseline characteristics were comparable. Most cases operated were of intermediate risk. Mean operative time was longer in the fellow group when compared to the tutor (150 min). Mean estimated blood loss were similar among the groups. Functional and oncological outcomes were better in the Tutor's group. No conversion to open surgery was performed. CONCLUSIONS: The LRP safe learning protocol proved to be an effective method to optimize the learning curve and perform safe surgery. However, the tutor's functional and oncological results were better, showing that this is a procedure with a steep learning curve and proficiency demands more than 25 cases. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6050564/ /pubmed/28853815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0137 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tobias-Machado, Marcos Pazeto, Cristiano Linck Neves-Neto, Oseas Castro Nunes-Silva, Igor Zampolli, Hamilton de Campos A safe teaching protocol of LRP (Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy) |
title | A safe teaching protocol of LRP (Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy) |
title_full | A safe teaching protocol of LRP (Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy) |
title_fullStr | A safe teaching protocol of LRP (Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy) |
title_full_unstemmed | A safe teaching protocol of LRP (Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy) |
title_short | A safe teaching protocol of LRP (Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy) |
title_sort | safe teaching protocol of lrp (laparoscopic radical prostatectomy) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28853815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0137 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tobiasmachadomarcos asafeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT pazetocristianolinck asafeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT nevesnetooseascastro asafeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT nunessilvaigor asafeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT zampollihamiltondecampos asafeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT tobiasmachadomarcos safeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT pazetocristianolinck safeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT nevesnetooseascastro safeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT nunessilvaigor safeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy AT zampollihamiltondecampos safeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy |