Cargando…

A safe teaching protocol of LRP (Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy)

PURPOSE: The LRP has a steep learning curve to obtain proficiency during which patient safety may be compromised. We present an adapted modular training system which purpose to optimize the learning curve and perform a safe surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the LRP safe lea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tobias-Machado, Marcos, Pazeto, Cristiano Linck, Neves-Neto, Oseas Castro, Nunes-Silva, Igor, Zampolli, Hamilton de Campos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28853815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0137
_version_ 1783340364360318976
author Tobias-Machado, Marcos
Pazeto, Cristiano Linck
Neves-Neto, Oseas Castro
Nunes-Silva, Igor
Zampolli, Hamilton de Campos
author_facet Tobias-Machado, Marcos
Pazeto, Cristiano Linck
Neves-Neto, Oseas Castro
Nunes-Silva, Igor
Zampolli, Hamilton de Campos
author_sort Tobias-Machado, Marcos
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The LRP has a steep learning curve to obtain proficiency during which patient safety may be compromised. We present an adapted modular training system which purpose to optimize the learning curve and perform a safe surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the LRP safe learning protocol applied during a fellowship program over eight years (2008-2015). The surgery was divided in 12 steps and 5 levels of difficulty. A maximum time interval was stipulated in 240 minutes. After an adaptation, the fellows had 120 minutes to perform all the corresponding modules to its accumulated skill. The participants gradually and safely pass through the steps and difficulty levels. Surgeries performed by fellows were analyzed as a single group and compared to a prior series performed by tutor. RESULTS: In eight years, 250 LRP were performed (25 per apprentice) during fellowship program and 150 procedures after completion. The baseline characteristics were comparable. Most cases operated were of intermediate risk. Mean operative time was longer in the fellow group when compared to the tutor (150 min). Mean estimated blood loss were similar among the groups. Functional and oncological outcomes were better in the Tutor's group. No conversion to open surgery was performed. CONCLUSIONS: The LRP safe learning protocol proved to be an effective method to optimize the learning curve and perform safe surgery. However, the tutor's functional and oncological results were better, showing that this is a procedure with a steep learning curve and proficiency demands more than 25 cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6050564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60505642018-07-18 A safe teaching protocol of LRP (Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy) Tobias-Machado, Marcos Pazeto, Cristiano Linck Neves-Neto, Oseas Castro Nunes-Silva, Igor Zampolli, Hamilton de Campos Int Braz J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: The LRP has a steep learning curve to obtain proficiency during which patient safety may be compromised. We present an adapted modular training system which purpose to optimize the learning curve and perform a safe surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the LRP safe learning protocol applied during a fellowship program over eight years (2008-2015). The surgery was divided in 12 steps and 5 levels of difficulty. A maximum time interval was stipulated in 240 minutes. After an adaptation, the fellows had 120 minutes to perform all the corresponding modules to its accumulated skill. The participants gradually and safely pass through the steps and difficulty levels. Surgeries performed by fellows were analyzed as a single group and compared to a prior series performed by tutor. RESULTS: In eight years, 250 LRP were performed (25 per apprentice) during fellowship program and 150 procedures after completion. The baseline characteristics were comparable. Most cases operated were of intermediate risk. Mean operative time was longer in the fellow group when compared to the tutor (150 min). Mean estimated blood loss were similar among the groups. Functional and oncological outcomes were better in the Tutor's group. No conversion to open surgery was performed. CONCLUSIONS: The LRP safe learning protocol proved to be an effective method to optimize the learning curve and perform safe surgery. However, the tutor's functional and oncological results were better, showing that this is a procedure with a steep learning curve and proficiency demands more than 25 cases. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6050564/ /pubmed/28853815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0137 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tobias-Machado, Marcos
Pazeto, Cristiano Linck
Neves-Neto, Oseas Castro
Nunes-Silva, Igor
Zampolli, Hamilton de Campos
A safe teaching protocol of LRP (Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy)
title A safe teaching protocol of LRP (Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy)
title_full A safe teaching protocol of LRP (Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy)
title_fullStr A safe teaching protocol of LRP (Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy)
title_full_unstemmed A safe teaching protocol of LRP (Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy)
title_short A safe teaching protocol of LRP (Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy)
title_sort safe teaching protocol of lrp (laparoscopic radical prostatectomy)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28853815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0137
work_keys_str_mv AT tobiasmachadomarcos asafeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT pazetocristianolinck asafeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT nevesnetooseascastro asafeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT nunessilvaigor asafeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT zampollihamiltondecampos asafeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT tobiasmachadomarcos safeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT pazetocristianolinck safeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT nevesnetooseascastro safeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT nunessilvaigor safeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT zampollihamiltondecampos safeteachingprotocoloflrplaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy