Cargando…
Correcting the literature: Improvement trends seen in contents of retraction notices
OBJECTIVE: To analyse retraction notices from 2016 and compare their quality to the 2008 notices. RESULTS: From 146 retractions retrieved, only 123 were included, of which, a clear reason for retraction was available for 122 (99.2%) and no reason was given for one (0.8%). The main reasons for retrac...
Autores principales: | Deculllier, Evelyne, Maisonneuve, Hervé |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30016985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3576-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
What time-lag for a retraction search on PubMed?
por: Decullier, Evelyne, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Visibility of retractions: a cross-sectional one-year study
por: Decullier, Evelyne, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Retraction Notice
Publicado: (2011) -
RETRACTION NOTICE
Publicado: (2011) -
Retraction Notice
Publicado: (2012)