Cargando…

Continuous EEG monitoring in ICU

BACKGROUND: Continuous electroencephalogram (CEEG) monitoring is increasingly being used for brain monitoring in neurocritical care setting. This is because of the proven effectiveness of CEEG in diagnosing nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) as a cause of unexplained consciousness disorder. CEE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kubota, Yuichi, Nakamoto, Hidetoshi, Egawa, Satoshi, Kawamata, Takakazu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30026951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0310-z
_version_ 1783340386447523840
author Kubota, Yuichi
Nakamoto, Hidetoshi
Egawa, Satoshi
Kawamata, Takakazu
author_facet Kubota, Yuichi
Nakamoto, Hidetoshi
Egawa, Satoshi
Kawamata, Takakazu
author_sort Kubota, Yuichi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Continuous electroencephalogram (CEEG) monitoring is increasingly being used for brain monitoring in neurocritical care setting. This is because of the proven effectiveness of CEEG in diagnosing nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) as a cause of unexplained consciousness disorder. CEEG has been demonstrated to be effective in determining the response to, and outcome of, NCSE treatment. MAIN BODY: In this review article, the authors described the indication and methods of CEEG and diagnosis based on EEG pattern. As a condition characterized by unexplained consciousness disorder, NCSE is frequently encountered in the neurocritical care setting and is only accompanied by an altered EEG change without any clinically apparent manifestation, such as convulsion. Thus, it is considered a form of status epilepticus manifesting mainly with consciousness disorder. This is a diagnostic challenge but should not be overlooked as NCSE is a curable condition. However, CEEG is required for the correct diagnosis of NCSE, which is difficult to perform in daily clinical practice. There also are several challenges regarding urgent EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit setting, including system-related problems, such as the preparation of mobile EEG devices and collodion-applied electrodes; human resource-related problems, such as staffing of EEG technicians and physicians who can respond flexibly to unscheduled needs; and EEG-specific difficulties in interpretation/diagnosis. These issues preclude the wide spread of CEEG in daily practice. CONCLUSION: Recently, importance of CEEG was well accepted; however, no definitive diagnostic criteria exist for identifying EEG patterns suggestive of NCSE, especially the ambiguous significance of periodic discharges (PDs) further complicates the diagnosis of NCSE. Thus, analyzing the change in EEG patterns over time is important for the correct diagnosis of NCSE. Further studies are needed to collect sufficient CEEG data and assess the outcome of patients who have undergone therapeutic interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6050674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60506742018-07-19 Continuous EEG monitoring in ICU Kubota, Yuichi Nakamoto, Hidetoshi Egawa, Satoshi Kawamata, Takakazu J Intensive Care Review BACKGROUND: Continuous electroencephalogram (CEEG) monitoring is increasingly being used for brain monitoring in neurocritical care setting. This is because of the proven effectiveness of CEEG in diagnosing nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) as a cause of unexplained consciousness disorder. CEEG has been demonstrated to be effective in determining the response to, and outcome of, NCSE treatment. MAIN BODY: In this review article, the authors described the indication and methods of CEEG and diagnosis based on EEG pattern. As a condition characterized by unexplained consciousness disorder, NCSE is frequently encountered in the neurocritical care setting and is only accompanied by an altered EEG change without any clinically apparent manifestation, such as convulsion. Thus, it is considered a form of status epilepticus manifesting mainly with consciousness disorder. This is a diagnostic challenge but should not be overlooked as NCSE is a curable condition. However, CEEG is required for the correct diagnosis of NCSE, which is difficult to perform in daily clinical practice. There also are several challenges regarding urgent EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit setting, including system-related problems, such as the preparation of mobile EEG devices and collodion-applied electrodes; human resource-related problems, such as staffing of EEG technicians and physicians who can respond flexibly to unscheduled needs; and EEG-specific difficulties in interpretation/diagnosis. These issues preclude the wide spread of CEEG in daily practice. CONCLUSION: Recently, importance of CEEG was well accepted; however, no definitive diagnostic criteria exist for identifying EEG patterns suggestive of NCSE, especially the ambiguous significance of periodic discharges (PDs) further complicates the diagnosis of NCSE. Thus, analyzing the change in EEG patterns over time is important for the correct diagnosis of NCSE. Further studies are needed to collect sufficient CEEG data and assess the outcome of patients who have undergone therapeutic interventions. BioMed Central 2018-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6050674/ /pubmed/30026951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0310-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Kubota, Yuichi
Nakamoto, Hidetoshi
Egawa, Satoshi
Kawamata, Takakazu
Continuous EEG monitoring in ICU
title Continuous EEG monitoring in ICU
title_full Continuous EEG monitoring in ICU
title_fullStr Continuous EEG monitoring in ICU
title_full_unstemmed Continuous EEG monitoring in ICU
title_short Continuous EEG monitoring in ICU
title_sort continuous eeg monitoring in icu
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30026951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-018-0310-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kubotayuichi continuouseegmonitoringinicu
AT nakamotohidetoshi continuouseegmonitoringinicu
AT egawasatoshi continuouseegmonitoringinicu
AT kawamatatakakazu continuouseegmonitoringinicu