Cargando…
The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the radiological and clinical outcome parameters following lumbar hybrid dynamic instrumentation with the focus on the adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and adjacent segment disease (ASDi). METHODS: In this prospective trial all patients presenti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30016956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2103-x |
_version_ | 1783340387436331008 |
---|---|
author | Herren, Christian Sobottke, Rolf Pishnamaz, Miguel Scheyerer, Max Joseph Bredow, Jan Westermann, Leonard Berger, Eva Maria Oikonomidis, Stavros Eysel, Peer Siewe, Jan |
author_facet | Herren, Christian Sobottke, Rolf Pishnamaz, Miguel Scheyerer, Max Joseph Bredow, Jan Westermann, Leonard Berger, Eva Maria Oikonomidis, Stavros Eysel, Peer Siewe, Jan |
author_sort | Herren, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the radiological and clinical outcome parameters following lumbar hybrid dynamic instrumentation with the focus on the adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and adjacent segment disease (ASDi). METHODS: In this prospective trial all patients presenting with degenerative changes to the lumbar spine have been included. Precondition was a stable adjacent level with/without degenerative alteration. The elected patients underwent a standardised fusion procedure with hybrid instrumentation (DTO™, Zimmer Spine Inc., Denver, USA). Patients’ demographics have been documented and the follow-up visits were conducted after 6 weeks, and then stepwise after 6 up to 48 months. Each follow-up visit included assessment of quality of life and pain using specific questionnaires (COMI, SF-36, ODI) and the radiological evaluation with focus on the adjacent level alterations. RESULTS: At a mean follow up of 24 months an incidence of ASD with 10.91% and for ASDi with 18.18% has been observed. In 9% a conversion to standardised fusion was needed. There was a high rate of mechanical complication: (1) screw loosening (52.73%), (2) pedicle screw breakage (10.91%), and (3) rod breakage (3.64%) after a follow up of a maximum of 60 months. There were no significant difference of COMI, ODI and SF-36(v2) in comparison to all groups but all 55 patients showed a clinical improvement over the time. CONCLUSION: The dynamic hybrid DTO™ device is comparable to the long-term results after standardised fusion procedure, while a high rate of mechanical complication decreased the initial benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at the ClinicalTrials Register (#NCT03404232, 2018/01/18, registered retrospectively). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6050678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60506782018-07-19 The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial Herren, Christian Sobottke, Rolf Pishnamaz, Miguel Scheyerer, Max Joseph Bredow, Jan Westermann, Leonard Berger, Eva Maria Oikonomidis, Stavros Eysel, Peer Siewe, Jan BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the radiological and clinical outcome parameters following lumbar hybrid dynamic instrumentation with the focus on the adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and adjacent segment disease (ASDi). METHODS: In this prospective trial all patients presenting with degenerative changes to the lumbar spine have been included. Precondition was a stable adjacent level with/without degenerative alteration. The elected patients underwent a standardised fusion procedure with hybrid instrumentation (DTO™, Zimmer Spine Inc., Denver, USA). Patients’ demographics have been documented and the follow-up visits were conducted after 6 weeks, and then stepwise after 6 up to 48 months. Each follow-up visit included assessment of quality of life and pain using specific questionnaires (COMI, SF-36, ODI) and the radiological evaluation with focus on the adjacent level alterations. RESULTS: At a mean follow up of 24 months an incidence of ASD with 10.91% and for ASDi with 18.18% has been observed. In 9% a conversion to standardised fusion was needed. There was a high rate of mechanical complication: (1) screw loosening (52.73%), (2) pedicle screw breakage (10.91%), and (3) rod breakage (3.64%) after a follow up of a maximum of 60 months. There were no significant difference of COMI, ODI and SF-36(v2) in comparison to all groups but all 55 patients showed a clinical improvement over the time. CONCLUSION: The dynamic hybrid DTO™ device is comparable to the long-term results after standardised fusion procedure, while a high rate of mechanical complication decreased the initial benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at the ClinicalTrials Register (#NCT03404232, 2018/01/18, registered retrospectively). BioMed Central 2018-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6050678/ /pubmed/30016956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2103-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Herren, Christian Sobottke, Rolf Pishnamaz, Miguel Scheyerer, Max Joseph Bredow, Jan Westermann, Leonard Berger, Eva Maria Oikonomidis, Stavros Eysel, Peer Siewe, Jan The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial |
title | The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial |
title_full | The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial |
title_fullStr | The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial |
title_short | The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial |
title_sort | use of the dto™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30016956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2103-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herrenchristian theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT sobottkerolf theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT pishnamazmiguel theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT scheyerermaxjoseph theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT bredowjan theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT westermannleonard theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT bergerevamaria theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT oikonomidisstavros theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT eyselpeer theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT siewejan theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT herrenchristian useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT sobottkerolf useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT pishnamazmiguel useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT scheyerermaxjoseph useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT bredowjan useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT westermannleonard useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT bergerevamaria useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT oikonomidisstavros useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT eyselpeer useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial AT siewejan useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial |