Cargando…

The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the radiological and clinical outcome parameters following lumbar hybrid dynamic instrumentation with the focus on the adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and adjacent segment disease (ASDi). METHODS: In this prospective trial all patients presenti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herren, Christian, Sobottke, Rolf, Pishnamaz, Miguel, Scheyerer, Max Joseph, Bredow, Jan, Westermann, Leonard, Berger, Eva Maria, Oikonomidis, Stavros, Eysel, Peer, Siewe, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30016956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2103-x
_version_ 1783340387436331008
author Herren, Christian
Sobottke, Rolf
Pishnamaz, Miguel
Scheyerer, Max Joseph
Bredow, Jan
Westermann, Leonard
Berger, Eva Maria
Oikonomidis, Stavros
Eysel, Peer
Siewe, Jan
author_facet Herren, Christian
Sobottke, Rolf
Pishnamaz, Miguel
Scheyerer, Max Joseph
Bredow, Jan
Westermann, Leonard
Berger, Eva Maria
Oikonomidis, Stavros
Eysel, Peer
Siewe, Jan
author_sort Herren, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the radiological and clinical outcome parameters following lumbar hybrid dynamic instrumentation with the focus on the adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and adjacent segment disease (ASDi). METHODS: In this prospective trial all patients presenting with degenerative changes to the lumbar spine have been included. Precondition was a stable adjacent level with/without degenerative alteration. The elected patients underwent a standardised fusion procedure with hybrid instrumentation (DTO™, Zimmer Spine Inc., Denver, USA). Patients’ demographics have been documented and the follow-up visits were conducted after 6 weeks, and then stepwise after 6 up to 48 months. Each follow-up visit included assessment of quality of life and pain using specific questionnaires (COMI, SF-36, ODI) and the radiological evaluation with focus on the adjacent level alterations. RESULTS: At a mean follow up of 24 months an incidence of ASD with 10.91% and for ASDi with 18.18% has been observed. In 9% a conversion to standardised fusion was needed. There was a high rate of mechanical complication: (1) screw loosening (52.73%), (2) pedicle screw breakage (10.91%), and (3) rod breakage (3.64%) after a follow up of a maximum of 60 months. There were no significant difference of COMI, ODI and SF-36(v2) in comparison to all groups but all 55 patients showed a clinical improvement over the time. CONCLUSION: The dynamic hybrid DTO™ device is comparable to the long-term results after standardised fusion procedure, while a high rate of mechanical complication decreased the initial benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at the ClinicalTrials Register (#NCT03404232, 2018/01/18, registered retrospectively).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6050678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60506782018-07-19 The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial Herren, Christian Sobottke, Rolf Pishnamaz, Miguel Scheyerer, Max Joseph Bredow, Jan Westermann, Leonard Berger, Eva Maria Oikonomidis, Stavros Eysel, Peer Siewe, Jan BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the radiological and clinical outcome parameters following lumbar hybrid dynamic instrumentation with the focus on the adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and adjacent segment disease (ASDi). METHODS: In this prospective trial all patients presenting with degenerative changes to the lumbar spine have been included. Precondition was a stable adjacent level with/without degenerative alteration. The elected patients underwent a standardised fusion procedure with hybrid instrumentation (DTO™, Zimmer Spine Inc., Denver, USA). Patients’ demographics have been documented and the follow-up visits were conducted after 6 weeks, and then stepwise after 6 up to 48 months. Each follow-up visit included assessment of quality of life and pain using specific questionnaires (COMI, SF-36, ODI) and the radiological evaluation with focus on the adjacent level alterations. RESULTS: At a mean follow up of 24 months an incidence of ASD with 10.91% and for ASDi with 18.18% has been observed. In 9% a conversion to standardised fusion was needed. There was a high rate of mechanical complication: (1) screw loosening (52.73%), (2) pedicle screw breakage (10.91%), and (3) rod breakage (3.64%) after a follow up of a maximum of 60 months. There were no significant difference of COMI, ODI and SF-36(v2) in comparison to all groups but all 55 patients showed a clinical improvement over the time. CONCLUSION: The dynamic hybrid DTO™ device is comparable to the long-term results after standardised fusion procedure, while a high rate of mechanical complication decreased the initial benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at the ClinicalTrials Register (#NCT03404232, 2018/01/18, registered retrospectively). BioMed Central 2018-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6050678/ /pubmed/30016956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2103-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Herren, Christian
Sobottke, Rolf
Pishnamaz, Miguel
Scheyerer, Max Joseph
Bredow, Jan
Westermann, Leonard
Berger, Eva Maria
Oikonomidis, Stavros
Eysel, Peer
Siewe, Jan
The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial
title The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial
title_full The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial
title_fullStr The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial
title_short The use of the DTO™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial
title_sort use of the dto™ hybrid dynamic device: a clinical outcome- and radiological-based prospective clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30016956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2103-x
work_keys_str_mv AT herrenchristian theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT sobottkerolf theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT pishnamazmiguel theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT scheyerermaxjoseph theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT bredowjan theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT westermannleonard theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT bergerevamaria theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT oikonomidisstavros theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT eyselpeer theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT siewejan theuseofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT herrenchristian useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT sobottkerolf useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT pishnamazmiguel useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT scheyerermaxjoseph useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT bredowjan useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT westermannleonard useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT bergerevamaria useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT oikonomidisstavros useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT eyselpeer useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT siewejan useofthedtohybriddynamicdeviceaclinicaloutcomeandradiologicalbasedprospectiveclinicaltrial