Cargando…

Mesiodistal and Buccolingual Dimensions in Croatian Orthodontic Hypodontia Patients’ Teeth

OBJECTIVE: This study compared mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) tooth dimensions of hypodontia patients with a control group with complete dentition. The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in tooth sizes between hypodontia patients and the controls. METHODS: The sample comprised...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vidaković, Antun, Anić-Milošević, Sandra, Borić, Daša Nikolov, Meštrović, Senka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30033999
http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc52/1/2
_version_ 1783340402896535552
author Vidaković, Antun
Anić-Milošević, Sandra
Borić, Daša Nikolov
Meštrović, Senka
author_facet Vidaković, Antun
Anić-Milošević, Sandra
Borić, Daša Nikolov
Meštrović, Senka
author_sort Vidaković, Antun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study compared mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) tooth dimensions of hypodontia patients with a control group with complete dentition. The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in tooth sizes between hypodontia patients and the controls. METHODS: The sample comprised 76 patients with hypodontia (50 female and 26 male) aged between 11 and 18 years. The control group comprised 50 females and 26 males with the same age range as the study group. Mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) dimensions were measured on pretreatment dental casts with a digital caliper to the nearest 0.01 mm. The data were analyzed using Statistica 7.1 (StatSoft Inc.) statistical package (descriptive statistics, test of distribution normality, parametric statistics). RESULTS: The most common congenitally missing teeth were the lower second premolars (left 13.45% and right 13.90%) and upper lateral incisors (both left and right 12.56%), followed by upper second premolars (right 9.4o% and left 10.31%). The greatest differences between the study and control group were found in upper lateral incisors, 8.08% in MD and 6.40% in BL dimension. The smallest difference was found in BL dimension of lower lateral incisor (2.37%), MD dimension of lower second premolars and upper first molar (2.61%) and MD dimension of lower central incisor (2.26%). CONCLUSION: The teeth are smaller in subjects with hypodontia than those of the controls on average 4.02% in MD dimension and 3.85% in BL dimension. The tooth that showed the greatest difference in tooth dimension was maxillary lateral incisor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6050749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60507492018-07-20 Mesiodistal and Buccolingual Dimensions in Croatian Orthodontic Hypodontia Patients’ Teeth Vidaković, Antun Anić-Milošević, Sandra Borić, Daša Nikolov Meštrović, Senka Acta Stomatol Croat Original Scientifc Papers OBJECTIVE: This study compared mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) tooth dimensions of hypodontia patients with a control group with complete dentition. The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in tooth sizes between hypodontia patients and the controls. METHODS: The sample comprised 76 patients with hypodontia (50 female and 26 male) aged between 11 and 18 years. The control group comprised 50 females and 26 males with the same age range as the study group. Mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) dimensions were measured on pretreatment dental casts with a digital caliper to the nearest 0.01 mm. The data were analyzed using Statistica 7.1 (StatSoft Inc.) statistical package (descriptive statistics, test of distribution normality, parametric statistics). RESULTS: The most common congenitally missing teeth were the lower second premolars (left 13.45% and right 13.90%) and upper lateral incisors (both left and right 12.56%), followed by upper second premolars (right 9.4o% and left 10.31%). The greatest differences between the study and control group were found in upper lateral incisors, 8.08% in MD and 6.40% in BL dimension. The smallest difference was found in BL dimension of lower lateral incisor (2.37%), MD dimension of lower second premolars and upper first molar (2.61%) and MD dimension of lower central incisor (2.26%). CONCLUSION: The teeth are smaller in subjects with hypodontia than those of the controls on average 4.02% in MD dimension and 3.85% in BL dimension. The tooth that showed the greatest difference in tooth dimension was maxillary lateral incisor. University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, and Croatian Dental Society - Croatian Medical Association 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6050749/ /pubmed/30033999 http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc52/1/2 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives (CC BY-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Scientifc Papers
Vidaković, Antun
Anić-Milošević, Sandra
Borić, Daša Nikolov
Meštrović, Senka
Mesiodistal and Buccolingual Dimensions in Croatian Orthodontic Hypodontia Patients’ Teeth
title Mesiodistal and Buccolingual Dimensions in Croatian Orthodontic Hypodontia Patients’ Teeth
title_full Mesiodistal and Buccolingual Dimensions in Croatian Orthodontic Hypodontia Patients’ Teeth
title_fullStr Mesiodistal and Buccolingual Dimensions in Croatian Orthodontic Hypodontia Patients’ Teeth
title_full_unstemmed Mesiodistal and Buccolingual Dimensions in Croatian Orthodontic Hypodontia Patients’ Teeth
title_short Mesiodistal and Buccolingual Dimensions in Croatian Orthodontic Hypodontia Patients’ Teeth
title_sort mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions in croatian orthodontic hypodontia patients’ teeth
topic Original Scientifc Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30033999
http://dx.doi.org/10.15644/asc52/1/2
work_keys_str_mv AT vidakovicantun mesiodistalandbuccolingualdimensionsincroatianorthodontichypodontiapatientsteeth
AT anicmilosevicsandra mesiodistalandbuccolingualdimensionsincroatianorthodontichypodontiapatientsteeth
AT boricdasanikolov mesiodistalandbuccolingualdimensionsincroatianorthodontichypodontiapatientsteeth
AT mestrovicsenka mesiodistalandbuccolingualdimensionsincroatianorthodontichypodontiapatientsteeth