Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Intratendinous Prolotherapy Injection with Conventional Treatment to Treat Focal Supraspinatus Tendinosis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy injection for focal supraspinatus rotator cuff tendinosis via outcomes such as functional score, range of movement, and real-time ultrasound parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 12 adult patients with focal supraspinatus tendinosis recruited...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: George, John, Li, Shyan Ch'ng, Jaafar, Zulkarnain, Hamid, Mohamad Shariff A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6051036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4384159
_version_ 1783340440277221376
author George, John
Li, Shyan Ch'ng
Jaafar, Zulkarnain
Hamid, Mohamad Shariff A.
author_facet George, John
Li, Shyan Ch'ng
Jaafar, Zulkarnain
Hamid, Mohamad Shariff A.
author_sort George, John
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy injection for focal supraspinatus rotator cuff tendinosis via outcomes such as functional score, range of movement, and real-time ultrasound parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 12 adult patients with focal supraspinatus tendinosis recruited after they had less than 30% improvement in functional (DASH) scores after one month of physiotherapy following initial presentation. Seven patients had 0.5–1.0 ml of prolotherapy injection (12.5% dextrose, 0.5% lignocaine) injected into the area of focal tendinosis under ultrasound guidance. Meanwhile, five patients continued standard physiotherapy with no intervention performed. Regional area of echogenicity in decibels, DASH, range of movements of the shoulder, pain, and sleep scores were measured at baseline and at 12 weeks. RESULTS: The prolotherapy group showed significant improvement in shoulder abduction (p=0.030) and an improvement in sleep score (p=0.027). The echogenicity of area of tendinosis significantly increases at the end of treatment (p=0.009). However, there was a nonsignificant reduction in pain score in the injection group (43.5%) and in the control group (25%) at 12 weeks (p > 0.005). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided intratendinous prolotherapy injection significantly improves patient's range of abduction and improves sleep within 12 weeks of treatment compared to conventional physiotherapy management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered under Current Controlled Trials (UK) and given International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) of 43520960.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6051036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60510362018-07-29 Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Intratendinous Prolotherapy Injection with Conventional Treatment to Treat Focal Supraspinatus Tendinosis George, John Li, Shyan Ch'ng Jaafar, Zulkarnain Hamid, Mohamad Shariff A. Scientifica (Cairo) Clinical Study OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy injection for focal supraspinatus rotator cuff tendinosis via outcomes such as functional score, range of movement, and real-time ultrasound parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 12 adult patients with focal supraspinatus tendinosis recruited after they had less than 30% improvement in functional (DASH) scores after one month of physiotherapy following initial presentation. Seven patients had 0.5–1.0 ml of prolotherapy injection (12.5% dextrose, 0.5% lignocaine) injected into the area of focal tendinosis under ultrasound guidance. Meanwhile, five patients continued standard physiotherapy with no intervention performed. Regional area of echogenicity in decibels, DASH, range of movements of the shoulder, pain, and sleep scores were measured at baseline and at 12 weeks. RESULTS: The prolotherapy group showed significant improvement in shoulder abduction (p=0.030) and an improvement in sleep score (p=0.027). The echogenicity of area of tendinosis significantly increases at the end of treatment (p=0.009). However, there was a nonsignificant reduction in pain score in the injection group (43.5%) and in the control group (25%) at 12 weeks (p > 0.005). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided intratendinous prolotherapy injection significantly improves patient's range of abduction and improves sleep within 12 weeks of treatment compared to conventional physiotherapy management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered under Current Controlled Trials (UK) and given International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) of 43520960. Hindawi 2018-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6051036/ /pubmed/30057849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4384159 Text en Copyright © 2018 John George et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
George, John
Li, Shyan Ch'ng
Jaafar, Zulkarnain
Hamid, Mohamad Shariff A.
Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Intratendinous Prolotherapy Injection with Conventional Treatment to Treat Focal Supraspinatus Tendinosis
title Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Intratendinous Prolotherapy Injection with Conventional Treatment to Treat Focal Supraspinatus Tendinosis
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Intratendinous Prolotherapy Injection with Conventional Treatment to Treat Focal Supraspinatus Tendinosis
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Intratendinous Prolotherapy Injection with Conventional Treatment to Treat Focal Supraspinatus Tendinosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Intratendinous Prolotherapy Injection with Conventional Treatment to Treat Focal Supraspinatus Tendinosis
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Intratendinous Prolotherapy Injection with Conventional Treatment to Treat Focal Supraspinatus Tendinosis
title_sort comparative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided intratendinous prolotherapy injection with conventional treatment to treat focal supraspinatus tendinosis
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6051036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4384159
work_keys_str_mv AT georgejohn comparativeeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedintratendinousprolotherapyinjectionwithconventionaltreatmenttotreatfocalsupraspinatustendinosis
AT lishyanchng comparativeeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedintratendinousprolotherapyinjectionwithconventionaltreatmenttotreatfocalsupraspinatustendinosis
AT jaafarzulkarnain comparativeeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedintratendinousprolotherapyinjectionwithconventionaltreatmenttotreatfocalsupraspinatustendinosis
AT hamidmohamadshariffa comparativeeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedintratendinousprolotherapyinjectionwithconventionaltreatmenttotreatfocalsupraspinatustendinosis