Cargando…

Distribution of optometric practices relative to deprivation index in Scotland

BACKGROUND: The UK National Health Service aims to provide universal availability of healthcare, and eye-care availability was a primary driver in the development of the Scottish General Ophthalmic Services (GOS) model. Accordingly, a relatively equal distribution of optometry practices across socio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Legge, Robin, Strang, Niall C, Loffler, Gunter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6051464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28985410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx074
_version_ 1783340528897622016
author Legge, Robin
Strang, Niall C
Loffler, Gunter
author_facet Legge, Robin
Strang, Niall C
Loffler, Gunter
author_sort Legge, Robin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The UK National Health Service aims to provide universal availability of healthcare, and eye-care availability was a primary driver in the development of the Scottish General Ophthalmic Services (GOS) model. Accordingly, a relatively equal distribution of optometry practices across socio-economic areas is required. We examined practice distribution relative to deprivation. METHODS: 672 practices were sampled from nine Health Boards within Scotland. Practices were assigned a deprivation ranking by referencing their postcode with the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) tool (Scottish Executive National Statistics: General Report. 2016). RESULTS: Averaged across Health Boards, the share of practices for the five deprivation quintiles was 25, 33, 18, 14 and 11% from most to least deprived area, respectively. Although there was some variation of relative practice distribution in individual Health Boards, 17 of the 45 regions (nine Health Boards, five quintiles) had a close balance between population and share of practices. There was no clear pattern of practice distribution as a function of deprivation rank. Analysis revealed good correlation between practice and population share for each Health Board, and for the combined data (R(2) = 0.898, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Distribution of optometry practices is relatively balanced across socio-economic areas, suggesting that differences in eye-examination uptake across social strata are unrelated to service availability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6051464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60514642018-07-23 Distribution of optometric practices relative to deprivation index in Scotland Legge, Robin Strang, Niall C Loffler, Gunter J Public Health (Oxf) Original Article BACKGROUND: The UK National Health Service aims to provide universal availability of healthcare, and eye-care availability was a primary driver in the development of the Scottish General Ophthalmic Services (GOS) model. Accordingly, a relatively equal distribution of optometry practices across socio-economic areas is required. We examined practice distribution relative to deprivation. METHODS: 672 practices were sampled from nine Health Boards within Scotland. Practices were assigned a deprivation ranking by referencing their postcode with the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) tool (Scottish Executive National Statistics: General Report. 2016). RESULTS: Averaged across Health Boards, the share of practices for the five deprivation quintiles was 25, 33, 18, 14 and 11% from most to least deprived area, respectively. Although there was some variation of relative practice distribution in individual Health Boards, 17 of the 45 regions (nine Health Boards, five quintiles) had a close balance between population and share of practices. There was no clear pattern of practice distribution as a function of deprivation rank. Analysis revealed good correlation between practice and population share for each Health Board, and for the combined data (R(2) = 0.898, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Distribution of optometry practices is relatively balanced across socio-economic areas, suggesting that differences in eye-examination uptake across social strata are unrelated to service availability. Oxford University Press 2018-06 2017-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6051464/ /pubmed/28985410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx074 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Legge, Robin
Strang, Niall C
Loffler, Gunter
Distribution of optometric practices relative to deprivation index in Scotland
title Distribution of optometric practices relative to deprivation index in Scotland
title_full Distribution of optometric practices relative to deprivation index in Scotland
title_fullStr Distribution of optometric practices relative to deprivation index in Scotland
title_full_unstemmed Distribution of optometric practices relative to deprivation index in Scotland
title_short Distribution of optometric practices relative to deprivation index in Scotland
title_sort distribution of optometric practices relative to deprivation index in scotland
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6051464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28985410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx074
work_keys_str_mv AT leggerobin distributionofoptometricpracticesrelativetodeprivationindexinscotland
AT strangniallc distributionofoptometricpracticesrelativetodeprivationindexinscotland
AT lofflergunter distributionofoptometricpracticesrelativetodeprivationindexinscotland