Cargando…

Permanent Paddle-lead Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation

Objectives A significant number of chronic pain patients rely on spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for treatment of their intractable pain. A screening trial using percutaneous electrodes is an integral step for predicting a successful treatment course with a permanent SCS system. Most of these trials a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jonathan J, Simpson, Richard K, Dalm, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6051561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034967
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2645
_version_ 1783340539998896128
author Lee, Jonathan J
Simpson, Richard K
Dalm, Brian
author_facet Lee, Jonathan J
Simpson, Richard K
Dalm, Brian
author_sort Lee, Jonathan J
collection PubMed
description Objectives A significant number of chronic pain patients rely on spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for treatment of their intractable pain. A screening trial using percutaneous electrodes is an integral step for predicting a successful treatment course with a permanent SCS system. Most of these trials are performed in an outpatient ambulatory surgical center and some in the office setting. However, there are select patients who are considered poor candidates for percutaneous trials. We present the initial report of patients who have received surgical implantation of permanent paddle-leads for SCS trials at our institution and show that this was a safe and effective alternative for our patients who could not undergo percutaneous trials.  Methods We retrospectively reviewed the hospital charts of 12 patients who underwent permanent surgically-implanted paddle-lead trials from 2014 to 2017. Success was considered positive with a 50% reduction in pain rating. If positive, patients were brought back to the operating room to have the implanted leads connected to an internalized pulse generator.    Results All 12 patients met the criteria for a successful trial. Only one patient had his SCS system surgically removed after nine months. None of our patients reported or returned with paddle-lead migrations or infections.  Conclusions We report that surgically-implanted paddle-lead trials were a safe and effective alternative to percutaneous trials in our patients who were deemed poor candidates for percutaneous trials. No complications occurred and all of our patients received a second surgery for internalization of the SCS system. Patients who have previously failed percutaneous trials may be false-negatives to SCS. 
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6051561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60515612018-07-22 Permanent Paddle-lead Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation Lee, Jonathan J Simpson, Richard K Dalm, Brian Cureus Neurosurgery Objectives A significant number of chronic pain patients rely on spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for treatment of their intractable pain. A screening trial using percutaneous electrodes is an integral step for predicting a successful treatment course with a permanent SCS system. Most of these trials are performed in an outpatient ambulatory surgical center and some in the office setting. However, there are select patients who are considered poor candidates for percutaneous trials. We present the initial report of patients who have received surgical implantation of permanent paddle-leads for SCS trials at our institution and show that this was a safe and effective alternative for our patients who could not undergo percutaneous trials.  Methods We retrospectively reviewed the hospital charts of 12 patients who underwent permanent surgically-implanted paddle-lead trials from 2014 to 2017. Success was considered positive with a 50% reduction in pain rating. If positive, patients were brought back to the operating room to have the implanted leads connected to an internalized pulse generator.    Results All 12 patients met the criteria for a successful trial. Only one patient had his SCS system surgically removed after nine months. None of our patients reported or returned with paddle-lead migrations or infections.  Conclusions We report that surgically-implanted paddle-lead trials were a safe and effective alternative to percutaneous trials in our patients who were deemed poor candidates for percutaneous trials. No complications occurred and all of our patients received a second surgery for internalization of the SCS system. Patients who have previously failed percutaneous trials may be false-negatives to SCS.  Cureus 2018-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6051561/ /pubmed/30034967 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2645 Text en Copyright © 2018, Lee et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neurosurgery
Lee, Jonathan J
Simpson, Richard K
Dalm, Brian
Permanent Paddle-lead Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation
title Permanent Paddle-lead Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation
title_full Permanent Paddle-lead Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation
title_fullStr Permanent Paddle-lead Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Permanent Paddle-lead Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation
title_short Permanent Paddle-lead Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation
title_sort permanent paddle-lead trial for spinal cord stimulation
topic Neurosurgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6051561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30034967
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2645
work_keys_str_mv AT leejonathanj permanentpaddleleadtrialforspinalcordstimulation
AT simpsonrichardk permanentpaddleleadtrialforspinalcordstimulation
AT dalmbrian permanentpaddleleadtrialforspinalcordstimulation