Cargando…

Radiological evaluation of the femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction()

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the inclination and the length of the femoral tunnel in patients submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) surgery by transtibial and anatomical techniques. METHODS: This is an analytical observational study in patients with ACL injury that underwent arthros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peres, Luciano Rodrigo, Teixeira, Matheus Silva, Scalizi Júnior, Caetano, Akl Filho, Wolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6051960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30027069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2018.05.001
_version_ 1783340582512361472
author Peres, Luciano Rodrigo
Teixeira, Matheus Silva
Scalizi Júnior, Caetano
Akl Filho, Wolf
author_facet Peres, Luciano Rodrigo
Teixeira, Matheus Silva
Scalizi Júnior, Caetano
Akl Filho, Wolf
author_sort Peres, Luciano Rodrigo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the inclination and the length of the femoral tunnel in patients submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) surgery by transtibial and anatomical techniques. METHODS: This is an analytical observational study in patients with ACL injury that underwent arthroscopic reconstruction through transtibial and anatomical surgical techniques. In the immediate postoperative period, computed tomography (CT) and anteroposterior (AP) view digital radiographs (X-rays) were performed to evaluate the inclination and length of the femoral tunnel. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were analyzed: 27 underwent anatomical reconstruction and 15, transtibial reconstruction. The inclination angle and tunnel length by the transtibial technique are always greater than by the anatomical technique. The mean inclination angles were 59.75° (53.9–66.1°) in the X-rays and 54.17° (43.5–62.3°) in CT for the transtibial technique, and 42.91° (29.3–57.4°) in the X-rays and 39.10° (23.8–50.6°) in CT for the anatomical technique. Regarding the length of the femoral tunnel, the transtibial technique promotes longer tunnels: mean 55.7 mm (40.0–70.2 mm) in the transtibial and 35.5 mm (24.5–47 mm) in the anatomical technique. No statistically significant correlation was observed between the length and the inclination of the tunnel, regardless of the technique used. Thus, these variables can be considered as independent. CONCLUSION: The anatomical reconstruction technique presented shorter femoral tunnels and lower angle of inclination than the transtibial technique. The CT showed smaller inclination angle than the X-rays, regardless of the surgical technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6051960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60519602018-07-19 Radiological evaluation of the femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction() Peres, Luciano Rodrigo Teixeira, Matheus Silva Scalizi Júnior, Caetano Akl Filho, Wolf Rev Bras Ortop Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the inclination and the length of the femoral tunnel in patients submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) surgery by transtibial and anatomical techniques. METHODS: This is an analytical observational study in patients with ACL injury that underwent arthroscopic reconstruction through transtibial and anatomical surgical techniques. In the immediate postoperative period, computed tomography (CT) and anteroposterior (AP) view digital radiographs (X-rays) were performed to evaluate the inclination and length of the femoral tunnel. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were analyzed: 27 underwent anatomical reconstruction and 15, transtibial reconstruction. The inclination angle and tunnel length by the transtibial technique are always greater than by the anatomical technique. The mean inclination angles were 59.75° (53.9–66.1°) in the X-rays and 54.17° (43.5–62.3°) in CT for the transtibial technique, and 42.91° (29.3–57.4°) in the X-rays and 39.10° (23.8–50.6°) in CT for the anatomical technique. Regarding the length of the femoral tunnel, the transtibial technique promotes longer tunnels: mean 55.7 mm (40.0–70.2 mm) in the transtibial and 35.5 mm (24.5–47 mm) in the anatomical technique. No statistically significant correlation was observed between the length and the inclination of the tunnel, regardless of the technique used. Thus, these variables can be considered as independent. CONCLUSION: The anatomical reconstruction technique presented shorter femoral tunnels and lower angle of inclination than the transtibial technique. The CT showed smaller inclination angle than the X-rays, regardless of the surgical technique. Elsevier 2018-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6051960/ /pubmed/30027069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2018.05.001 Text en © 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Peres, Luciano Rodrigo
Teixeira, Matheus Silva
Scalizi Júnior, Caetano
Akl Filho, Wolf
Radiological evaluation of the femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction()
title Radiological evaluation of the femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction()
title_full Radiological evaluation of the femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction()
title_fullStr Radiological evaluation of the femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction()
title_full_unstemmed Radiological evaluation of the femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction()
title_short Radiological evaluation of the femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction()
title_sort radiological evaluation of the femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6051960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30027069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2018.05.001
work_keys_str_mv AT pereslucianorodrigo radiologicalevaluationofthefemoraltunnelpositioninginanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT teixeiramatheussilva radiologicalevaluationofthefemoraltunnelpositioninginanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT scalizijuniorcaetano radiologicalevaluationofthefemoraltunnelpositioninginanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT aklfilhowolf radiologicalevaluationofthefemoraltunnelpositioninginanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction