Cargando…
A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group
PURPOSE: To review brachytherapy resources and to explore current practice patterns in Italy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2016, on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO), the Brachytherapy Study Group proposed conducting a survey in order to identify brachytherapy practice patte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30038646 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2018.76981 |
_version_ | 1783340642462597120 |
---|---|
author | Autorino, Rosa Vicenzi, Lisa Tagliaferri, Luca Soatti, Carlo Kovacs, Prof. Gyeorgy Aristei, Cynthia |
author_facet | Autorino, Rosa Vicenzi, Lisa Tagliaferri, Luca Soatti, Carlo Kovacs, Prof. Gyeorgy Aristei, Cynthia |
author_sort | Autorino, Rosa |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To review brachytherapy resources and to explore current practice patterns in Italy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2016, on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO), the Brachytherapy Study Group proposed conducting a survey in order to identify brachytherapy practice patterns. An electronic questionnaire was sent to all radiotherapy centres in Italy, asking for: 1. General information on the Radiation Oncology Centre (affiliation, whether brachytherapy was delivered or not); 2. Brachytherapy equipment and human resources; 3. Brachytherapy procedures; 4. Brachytherapy assessment (number of patients treated annually, treated sites, and different modalities of treatments). RESULTS: A total of 66 questionnaires were returned (33.5% of all brachytherapy centers in Italy), out of which 48 (74%) from non-academic hospitals, 6 (10%) from academic hospitals, and 12 (16%) from private institutions. Most centers (84%) had only one brachytherapy machine; 44% did not deliver brachytherapy treatments or delivered less than demanded because of the lack of staff or expertise, need of modernization, or other reasons. The majority of treatments were administered to outpatients for gynecological tumors. CONCLUSIONS: This survey illustrates the current status of brachytherapy in Italy and should encourage collaboration to develop, implement, and monitor its use when appropriate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6052379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60523792018-07-23 A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group Autorino, Rosa Vicenzi, Lisa Tagliaferri, Luca Soatti, Carlo Kovacs, Prof. Gyeorgy Aristei, Cynthia J Contemp Brachytherapy Review Paper PURPOSE: To review brachytherapy resources and to explore current practice patterns in Italy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2016, on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO), the Brachytherapy Study Group proposed conducting a survey in order to identify brachytherapy practice patterns. An electronic questionnaire was sent to all radiotherapy centres in Italy, asking for: 1. General information on the Radiation Oncology Centre (affiliation, whether brachytherapy was delivered or not); 2. Brachytherapy equipment and human resources; 3. Brachytherapy procedures; 4. Brachytherapy assessment (number of patients treated annually, treated sites, and different modalities of treatments). RESULTS: A total of 66 questionnaires were returned (33.5% of all brachytherapy centers in Italy), out of which 48 (74%) from non-academic hospitals, 6 (10%) from academic hospitals, and 12 (16%) from private institutions. Most centers (84%) had only one brachytherapy machine; 44% did not deliver brachytherapy treatments or delivered less than demanded because of the lack of staff or expertise, need of modernization, or other reasons. The majority of treatments were administered to outpatients for gynecological tumors. CONCLUSIONS: This survey illustrates the current status of brachytherapy in Italy and should encourage collaboration to develop, implement, and monitor its use when appropriate. Termedia Publishing House 2018-06-30 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6052379/ /pubmed/30038646 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2018.76981 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Review Paper Autorino, Rosa Vicenzi, Lisa Tagliaferri, Luca Soatti, Carlo Kovacs, Prof. Gyeorgy Aristei, Cynthia A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group |
title | A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group |
title_full | A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group |
title_fullStr | A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group |
title_full_unstemmed | A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group |
title_short | A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group |
title_sort | national survey of airo (italian association of radiation oncology) brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy) study group |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30038646 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2018.76981 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT autorinorosa anationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup AT vicenzilisa anationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup AT tagliaferriluca anationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup AT soatticarlo anationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup AT kovacsprofgyeorgy anationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup AT aristeicynthia anationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup AT autorinorosa nationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup AT vicenzilisa nationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup AT tagliaferriluca nationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup AT soatticarlo nationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup AT kovacsprofgyeorgy nationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup AT aristeicynthia nationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup |