Cargando…

A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group

PURPOSE: To review brachytherapy resources and to explore current practice patterns in Italy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2016, on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO), the Brachytherapy Study Group proposed conducting a survey in order to identify brachytherapy practice patte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Autorino, Rosa, Vicenzi, Lisa, Tagliaferri, Luca, Soatti, Carlo, Kovacs, Prof. Gyeorgy, Aristei, Cynthia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30038646
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2018.76981
_version_ 1783340642462597120
author Autorino, Rosa
Vicenzi, Lisa
Tagliaferri, Luca
Soatti, Carlo
Kovacs, Prof. Gyeorgy
Aristei, Cynthia
author_facet Autorino, Rosa
Vicenzi, Lisa
Tagliaferri, Luca
Soatti, Carlo
Kovacs, Prof. Gyeorgy
Aristei, Cynthia
author_sort Autorino, Rosa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To review brachytherapy resources and to explore current practice patterns in Italy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2016, on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO), the Brachytherapy Study Group proposed conducting a survey in order to identify brachytherapy practice patterns. An electronic questionnaire was sent to all radiotherapy centres in Italy, asking for: 1. General information on the Radiation Oncology Centre (affiliation, whether brachytherapy was delivered or not); 2. Brachytherapy equipment and human resources; 3. Brachytherapy procedures; 4. Brachytherapy assessment (number of patients treated annually, treated sites, and different modalities of treatments). RESULTS: A total of 66 questionnaires were returned (33.5% of all brachytherapy centers in Italy), out of which 48 (74%) from non-academic hospitals, 6 (10%) from academic hospitals, and 12 (16%) from private institutions. Most centers (84%) had only one brachytherapy machine; 44% did not deliver brachytherapy treatments or delivered less than demanded because of the lack of staff or expertise, need of modernization, or other reasons. The majority of treatments were administered to outpatients for gynecological tumors. CONCLUSIONS: This survey illustrates the current status of brachytherapy in Italy and should encourage collaboration to develop, implement, and monitor its use when appropriate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6052379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60523792018-07-23 A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group Autorino, Rosa Vicenzi, Lisa Tagliaferri, Luca Soatti, Carlo Kovacs, Prof. Gyeorgy Aristei, Cynthia J Contemp Brachytherapy Review Paper PURPOSE: To review brachytherapy resources and to explore current practice patterns in Italy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2016, on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO), the Brachytherapy Study Group proposed conducting a survey in order to identify brachytherapy practice patterns. An electronic questionnaire was sent to all radiotherapy centres in Italy, asking for: 1. General information on the Radiation Oncology Centre (affiliation, whether brachytherapy was delivered or not); 2. Brachytherapy equipment and human resources; 3. Brachytherapy procedures; 4. Brachytherapy assessment (number of patients treated annually, treated sites, and different modalities of treatments). RESULTS: A total of 66 questionnaires were returned (33.5% of all brachytherapy centers in Italy), out of which 48 (74%) from non-academic hospitals, 6 (10%) from academic hospitals, and 12 (16%) from private institutions. Most centers (84%) had only one brachytherapy machine; 44% did not deliver brachytherapy treatments or delivered less than demanded because of the lack of staff or expertise, need of modernization, or other reasons. The majority of treatments were administered to outpatients for gynecological tumors. CONCLUSIONS: This survey illustrates the current status of brachytherapy in Italy and should encourage collaboration to develop, implement, and monitor its use when appropriate. Termedia Publishing House 2018-06-30 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6052379/ /pubmed/30038646 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2018.76981 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Autorino, Rosa
Vicenzi, Lisa
Tagliaferri, Luca
Soatti, Carlo
Kovacs, Prof. Gyeorgy
Aristei, Cynthia
A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group
title A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group
title_full A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group
title_fullStr A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group
title_full_unstemmed A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group
title_short A national survey of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy) study group
title_sort national survey of airo (italian association of radiation oncology) brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy) study group
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6052379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30038646
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2018.76981
work_keys_str_mv AT autorinorosa anationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup
AT vicenzilisa anationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup
AT tagliaferriluca anationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup
AT soatticarlo anationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup
AT kovacsprofgyeorgy anationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup
AT aristeicynthia anationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup
AT autorinorosa nationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup
AT vicenzilisa nationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup
AT tagliaferriluca nationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup
AT soatticarlo nationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup
AT kovacsprofgyeorgy nationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup
AT aristeicynthia nationalsurveyofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncologybrachytherapyinterventionalradiotherapystudygroup